 |
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:10 PM
|
#571
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 11,659
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by NashaMasha
Vika is less dangerous player than Li Na . When Li Na is on fire she can outhit and outplay even Serena. Her main problem is to play the whole match "on fire" otherwise she can collapse and lose faster than checkmate in three moves in chess.. She managed to do it vs Sharapova, if she manages vs Vika , say Good bye to Vika
|
Granted I didn't see the statistics until the last 2-3 minutes but Li is never going to receive so much unforced errors from Victoria. Maria does have an inter-continental game-plan, tactical [...] whole in her game and that's never ever going to change.
You need to watch Li/Victoria matches in Sydney and Madrid -- Li played at least well in 1 set, the problem againt Victoria is that you need to be good 100% of the times. It doesn't matter if Li comes 100% or not, I know Victoria is largely capable of keeping a very high level of controlled-offensive tennis for a very long period of time which is a total impossibility for Li.
Anyways, we'll what happens, I wouldn't fall in the trap of claiming Victoria to [...] !!!11!! like many did with Serena, Maria etc. but the facts are if Victoria plays her best, she's a vastly superior player to Li in every aspect of the game and should logically, with this statement, clinch the title.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:11 PM
|
#572
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 992
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by oliviasmith
you throw out all these things that easily apply to you. you literally could be describing yourself.  i find you so amusing. 
|
THIS!!!!   I refuse to respond & feed trolls  I just state the facts ...life is good right now   Just fed a bag of sugarpova to my cat, now going to class with beer in my hand 
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:13 PM
|
#573
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 272
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroSumGame
THIS!!!!   I refuse to respond & feed trolls  I just state the facts ...life is good right now   Just fed a bag of sugarpova to my cat, now going to class with beer in my hand 
|
"i refuse to respond & feed trolls".

|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:23 PM
|
#574
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 2,100
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by I.Luv.Kvitty
|
Oh no you did not
buahahahahahaha  
__________________
Vika Serena
16 is our number
what's yours?
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:27 PM
|
#575
|
|
La Divina Assoluta
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 9,805
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Li is beautiful to watch when playing like that. Immaculate depth throughout, creating superb angles off non-angled balls (a Davenport speciality) and serving as accurately and efficiently as she can. A couple of wobbles of course, but nothing that superlative ball-striking couldn't resolve.
Pova's serve was shit from the start, and her return soon followed. Could never gain any momentum for any length of time, and began to get out-hit regularly. Li's use of width and deptn and general weight of shot made her look slow and clumsy also.
Li has great chances against Azarenka. She could certainly 'stress' her out.
__________________
'O Ma Lyre Immortelle'
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:37 PM
|
#576
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,952
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sergius
And still got owned in the final without even earning a single bp IIRC lol. I couldn't help it lol
What about the Olympics? 
I thought she played very good,btw, but just faced an GOAT-like errorless and suddenly smart Li Na. And lost. Things like that happen. Get over it.
|
I said some matches and she didn't even get owned in the final.
She played very good?
Ok after that statement, I'm starting to see what kind of poster you are. Good to know.
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:39 PM
|
#577
|
|
Time flies when you're falling down
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The periphery
Posts: 28,490
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
__________________
S.Williams ♥ Ivanović ♥ A.Radwańska ♥ Rybáriková ♥ Kerber ♥ Kvitová ♥ Govortsova ♥ Jovanovski
Chakvetadze ♥ Kanepi ♥ Vekić ♥ Larsson ♥ Cetkovská ♥ Robson ♥ Cibulková ♥ Pavlyuchenkova
Suicide Champion: 2013 Miami; 2012 Doha; 2011 Dubai; 2010 Indian Wells, Bad Gastein; 2008 Melbourne, New Haven, Prague; 2007 Toronto
PAW Champion: 2012 Tokyo, Moscow; 2011 Roland Garros; 2010 Bali, Portoroz
TT Doubles Champion (with Djezonfly): 2012 Melbourne, 2011 Estoril My Twitter
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:45 PM
|
#578
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 7,479
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by delicatecutter
GOAT-NA's mental resolve in this match was LEGENDARY!!!!! She won all the crucial points. She has come such a long way!
I almost feel sorry for Maria's legion of bitter gay fanboys. I'm sure several of them are on Suicide Watch as I type this. 
|
go to SS and check that hardly 10% of Masha's fans were sure she can win AO this year.... it's not enough just training to get at the top. Last year she reached Final also playing sloppy, but to win tournament she should be in top form, because at least one top player is on fire , who can't be beaten when you are playing a bit shaky
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:47 PM
|
#579
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,148
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
I said some matches and she didn't even get owned in the final.
She played very good?
Ok after that statement, I'm starting to see what kind of poster you are. Good to know.
|
not delusional, I guess? 
She did play well by her standards
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:49 PM
|
#580
|
|
Undefeated
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 13,773
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by NashaMasha
go to SS and check that hardly 10% of Masha's fans were sure she can win AO this year.... i
|
That must have been the 10% that made all those ridiculous banners and predictions then 
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:50 PM
|
#581
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,952
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sergius
not delusional, I guess? 
She did play good by her standards
|
She played alright in most her matches at the AO, nothing to write home about and wasn't close to that level in the semis. You do the math. Anyway it's fine, you can say whatever you want lol
And I'm getting even more what kind of poster you are by reading your "joke"
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:53 PM
|
#582
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Legend's Palace
Posts: 12,891
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Bless you all 
__________________
Quote:
I go through life like a Karate Kid - Britney Spears
|
Maria Sharapova Venus & Serena Martina Hingis Anna Kournikova Monica Seles Ana Ivanovic Victoria Azarenka Jelena Dokic Laura Robson Eugenie Bouchard Heather Watson Marion Bartoli Petra Kvitova Donna Vekic
Official Siberian Death Stare Of The Maria Mafia
Masha - " Isn't she back in Poland already?" @TheGrandSlams
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:53 PM
|
#583
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 272
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimmie48
That must have been the 10% that made all those ridiculous banners and predictions then 
|
Why not?
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 05:56 PM
|
#584
|
|
Clay Monsters!!!!
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 2,668
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamieOwen3
Bless you all 
|
Bless you too hunny.
At least you are more sane than the other Masha.......yeah. 
|
|
|
Jan 24th, 2013, 06:06 PM
|
#585
|
|
Undefeated
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 13,773
|
Re: Li Na def Maria Sharapova 6-2 6-2
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samsuin
Why not?
|
Because it's obviously dishonest. After her first round matches and those meaningless "records", the majority of her stans expected her to easily make the final.
Turning around now and basically pretending that they knew this would have happened is well...dishonest... as usual.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|