 |
|
Sep 28th, 2012, 09:18 PM
|
#331
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,353
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anabelcroft
Did not say that,of course, just that Graf always had the upper hand in their matches...even when Monica was number 1!I know you like this thing fact so much 
|
Your stats are meaningless as I've told you already 1000 times.
I could also say that Seles had the upperhand over Graf in 90s. She had the upperhand when Seles started her domination in clay court court season in 1990. I could say that Seles had the upperhand over Graf in the Slams when Seles was number one. I could say that Seles beat Graf 3 tournaments before before the stabbing.
See, my stats are almost as twisted as yours.
They are meaningless so please stop reapeating them over and over again because, no offense, that makes you look 
__________________
Azarenka, Pennetta, Hantuchova, Ivanovic, Petrova, Wozniacki, Stosur, Petkovic
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
Sep 28th, 2012, 09:23 PM
|
#332
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,353
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cehowardrx7
Matt it is very plain to see that you are a Graf-Tard.
|
This is not the first someone called me a Graf-tard. Must be because of my flag 
__________________
Azarenka, Pennetta, Hantuchova, Ivanovic, Petrova, Wozniacki, Stosur, Petkovic
|
|
|
Sep 28th, 2012, 09:30 PM
|
#333
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 9,359
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01
This is not the first someone called me a Graf-tard. Must be because of my flag 
|
If he only knew.
I guess he didn't read through the thread. 
|
|
|
Sep 28th, 2012, 09:31 PM
|
#334
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 13,353
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Excelscior
If he only knew.
I guess he didn't read through the thread. 
|

__________________
Azarenka, Pennetta, Hantuchova, Ivanovic, Petrova, Wozniacki, Stosur, Petkovic
|
|
|
Sep 28th, 2012, 11:10 PM
|
#335
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,099
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anabelcroft
Well,not even up to that point Seles wasn't beating Graf, just look at their meetings 
|
At first, Serena and Venus weren't beating Hingis either, but what happened down the line?
Ya Dig? 
|
|
|
Sep 29th, 2012, 01:24 AM
|
#336
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 4,457
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Excelscior
OK.
Fair enough (on the what Seles could do part).
We still have some slight disagreement on your reaction of Gunther Parche's intentions.
I could see you feeling he did his job, if he would have permanently, physically harmed Seles. He didn't.
The rest was up to Seles. Not that it makes her bad or what he did good. But when you say what you say, you don't account for the fact that not every player "would of went out like that".
|
I would say that Gunther's intention was to physically harm Seles so that she could no longer compete at the top level of the game. The fact is that Graf did benefit from the stabbing, while Monica's dsire, confidence and game suffered. Most of the problem may have been mental, but the the mind rules the body. The day Monica was stabbed was one of the luckiest days in Steffi Graf's tennis career, which IMO, inflated her slam total amount.
|
|
|
Sep 29th, 2012, 04:56 AM
|
#337
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,549
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cehowardrx7
At first, Serena and Venus weren't beating Hingis either, but what happened down the line?
Ya Dig? 
|
True, unlike Graf and Seles case where Steffi continued beating Monica even after 
|
|
|
Sep 29th, 2012, 11:18 PM
|
#338
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,099
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by thrust
I would say that Gunther's intention was to physically harm Seles so that she could no longer compete at the top level of the game. The fact is that Graf did benefit from the stabbing, while Monica's dsire, confidence and game suffered. Most of the problem may have been mental, but the the mind rules the body. The day Monica was stabbed was one of the luckiest days in Steffi Graf's tennis career, which IMO, inflated her slam total amount.
|
All true, not only, it is there for all to see. The motive of the stabber and the aftermath. None of that is secret. Yet, the Graf-Tards won't to say it doesn't affect Graf's record. How can it NOT affect Graf's record. No matter what the Graf fans say, history has it recorded correctly. And please don't let the #1 Graf-Tard tell me about online polls..  
|
|
|
Sep 29th, 2012, 11:22 PM
|
#339
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,099
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anabelcroft
True, unlike Graf and Seles case where Steffi continued beating Monica even after 
|
Were these slams played on the moon???As Graf the opponent!
1990 Roland Garros (Paris) Final 7-6, 6-4 Monica Seles
1992 Roland Garros (Paris) Final 6-2, 3-6, 10-8 Monica Seles
1993 Australian Open (Melbourne) Final 4-6, 6-3, 6-2 Monica Seles
|
|
|
Sep 30th, 2012, 12:01 PM
|
#340
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,549
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cehowardrx7
Were these slams played on the moon???As Graf the opponent!
1990 Roland Garros (Paris) Final 7-6, 6-4 Monica Seles
1992 Roland Garros (Paris) Final 6-2, 3-6, 10-8 Monica Seles
1993 Australian Open (Melbourne) Final 4-6, 6-3, 6-2 Monica Seles
|
And were these matches played on the moon? As I said, before and after as Seles the number 1 opponent!
1991 San Antonio (US) Final 6-4 6-3 Steffi Graf
1991 Hamburg (Ger) Final 7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 Steffi Graf
1992 Wimbledon (UK) 6:2 6:1 Steffi Graf
1995 US OPEN (US) 7-6(6) 0-6 6-3 Steffi Graf
1996 US OPEN (US) 7:5 6:4 Steffi Graf
|
|
|
Sep 30th, 2012, 12:56 PM
|
#341
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,099
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anabelcroft
And were these matches played on the moon?As I said, before and after as Seles the number 1 opponent!
1991 San Antonio (US) Final 6-4 6-3 Steffi Graf
1991 Hamburg (Ger) Final 7-5 6-7(4) 6-3 Steffi Graf
1992 Wimbledon (UK) 6:2 6:1 Steffi Graf
1995 US OPEN (US) 7-6(6) 0-6 6-3 Steffi Graf
1996 US OPEN (US) 7:5 6:4 Steffi Graf
|
Glad you posted that, it proves I am correct. The San Antonio and Hamburg are NOT SLAMS.
The 1992 Wimbledon is Graf's. She gets CREDIT FOR THAT.
However, the 1995, 1996 US OPEN is TAINTED.
Seles was stabbed in Oct 1993..All slams of Graf after that are TAINTED, therefore making her slam and match record after Oct 1993 all TAINTED.
History has recorded that, and nothing you say or post can change that. Graf's main rival was stabbed for the sole purpose of advancing Graf!
You lose again.. Sorry... 
|
|
|
Sep 30th, 2012, 03:08 PM
|
#342
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,549
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cehowardrx7
Glad you posted that, it proves I am correct. The San Antonio and Hamburg are NOT SLAMS.
|
We were talking about their meetings in general as comparation of their games,styles and how they adapted to each others game and you brought up Grand Slams yourself just to find an excuse for her other losses under the premise that it is irrelevant,but in fact you know that it isn't!
|
|
|
Sep 30th, 2012, 03:10 PM
|
#343
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,549
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by cehowardrx7
However, the 1995 and 1996 US OPEN is TAINTED.
|
Until the final Monica was in better form then Graf with already 11-0 matches and just 23 games lost until the final,unlike Graf who lost one set,41 games until the final and even lost in the first round of the tournament Monica won so...
In 1996 US Open Monica lost just 18 games until the final while Graf lost 37,so again Monica was the one dominating the field,but not Graf!

Last edited by Anabelcroft : Sep 30th, 2012 at 03:39 PM.
|
|
|
Sep 30th, 2012, 03:13 PM
|
#344
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,549
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
And you still refuse to answer my question and that would be:
"If Graf's records are tainted why is she always voted as the greatest?"

Last edited by Anabelcroft : Oct 1st, 2012 at 01:18 AM.
|
|
|
Sep 30th, 2012, 10:33 PM
|
#345
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,099
|
Re: Why is Graf overlooked?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Anabelcroft
We were talking about their meetings in general as comparation of their games,styles and how they adapted to each others game and you brought up Grand Slams yourself just to find an excuse for her other losses under the premise that it is irrelevant,but in fact you know that it isn't!
|
If you ask any and all the pro tennis players what do they prefer to win, or what really counts, they will say SLAMS!! Not only that if you asked them, about the tier tournaments, opposed to slams, slams again wins. In other words, if most pro tennis players could get enough practice without playing the lessor tournaments, and I think they would only play slams. If they thought they could win all four of the slams by concentrating on them, they would do it..
Picture a player not winning on playing in lessor tournaments, but wins all four of the slams that year..That is what counts. Just like when we talk of past players, we talk of their slam count. So, I listed 3 slams close together that Seles won. Two FO and a AO. Then she was STABBED. Self explanatory!!
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|