Ranking 2012-3 - Page 9 - TennisForum.com
TennisForum.com   Wagerline.com MensTennisForums.com TennisUniverse.com
TennisForum.com is the premier Women's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
Reply

Old Apr 17th, 2013, 08:24 PM   #121
country flag fantic
esprits d'élite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,032
fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Let me just add what they achieved at INDOORS...Indoors is fast so it might be bad for defensive teams, no?

11/11/2012 USTA/ITA National Indoor Intercollegiate Championships Final #2 Kaitlyn Christian
Sabrina Santamaria #34 Li Xi
Stephanie Nauta #17 University of Virginia Win 6-0, 6-0
11/10/2012 USTA/ITA National Indoor Intercollegiate Championships Consolation #2 Kaitlyn Christian
Sabrina Santamaria #6 Alexa Guarachi
Mary Anne Macfarlane #8 University of Alabama
Win 6-2, 6-3
11/9/2012 USTA/ITA National Indoor Intercollegiate Championships Quarterfinals #2 Kaitlyn Christian
Sabrina Santamaria #31 Ashley Dai
Whitney Kay #1 North Carolina Win 8-3
11/8/2012 USTA/ITA National Indoor Intercollegiate Championships Round of 16 #2 Kaitlyn Christian
Sabrina Santamaria #47 Ellen Tsay
Stacey Tan #12 Stanford Win 8-4

It's called DOMINANCE
__________________
my tennis blog
my youtube acct
my flickr acct my imgur acct picasa album acct

"Learning knows no differences of social caste or privilege. The mind is a radical democrat."
- Woodrow Wilson
fantic is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old Apr 17th, 2013, 09:14 PM   #122
country flag tucker1989
Senior Member
 
tucker1989's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 21,828
tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute tucker1989 has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Definitely impressed by their play this year, like I said, very excited to see how it all unfolds at NCAA's, would be a fantastic achievement for them to win all 3 slams in one year
tucker1989 is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17th, 2013, 09:27 PM   #123
country flag 3gtennis
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 96
3gtennis is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Ranking 2012-3

someone hurt on that team for them to not play in April?
3gtennis is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 17th, 2013, 10:55 PM   #124
country flag fantic
esprits d'élite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,032
fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Here is Colette Lewis' take on the dbls #1

"The limitations of the rankings are spotlighted in the women's doubles this week. Kaitlyn Christian and Sabrina Santamaria of USC, who have won the two collegiate majors in the fall and are 25-0 overall, are no longer No. 1. They have been passed by Georgia's Silvia Garcia and Kate Fuller, who are 20-1, but do not have the fall tournament results to bolster their case, with Garcia a January freshman."

I think I've posted too much already about this 'issue', so this will be my last post of it
__________________
my tennis blog
my youtube acct
my flickr acct my imgur acct picasa album acct

"Learning knows no differences of social caste or privilege. The mind is a radical democrat."
- Woodrow Wilson
fantic is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 01:21 AM   #125
country flag 2nd_serve
Senior Member
 
2nd_serve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,122
2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by fantic View Post
Here is Colette Lewis' take on the dbls #1

"The limitations of the rankings are spotlighted in the women's doubles this week. Kaitlyn Christian and Sabrina Santamaria of USC, who have won the two collegiate majors in the fall and are 25-0 overall, are no longer No. 1. They have been passed by Georgia's Silvia Garcia and Kate Fuller, who are 20-1, but do not have the fall tournament results to bolster their case, with Garcia a January freshman."

I think I've posted too much already about this 'issue', so this will be my last post of it
You are right

But I still want to call you out for saying the article about alternate ranking systems using Mallory Burdette was in the wrong thread. There should be more discussion on alternate ranking systems.
2nd_serve is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 01:26 AM   #126
country flag fantic
esprits d'élite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,032
fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd_serve View Post
You are right

But I still want to call you out for saying the article about alternate ranking systems using Mallory Burdette was in the wrong thread. There should be more discussion on alternate ranking systems.
Yes but Mal is at pro now.... I thought this was a college thread
__________________
my tennis blog
my youtube acct
my flickr acct my imgur acct picasa album acct

"Learning knows no differences of social caste or privilege. The mind is a radical democrat."
- Woodrow Wilson
fantic is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 01:38 AM   #127
country flag 2nd_serve
Senior Member
 
2nd_serve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,122
2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by fantic View Post
Yes but Mal is at pro now.... I thought this was a college thread
Yeah, maybe I'm hanging on to the glory of surrounding Mallory since USC outplayed Stanford.
2nd_serve is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 01:50 AM   #128
country flag fantic
esprits d'élite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,032
fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd_serve View Post
Yeah, maybe I'm hanging on to the glory of surrounding Mallory since USC outplayed Stanford.


Don't worry, Stanford will rise again, they're too good not to.
__________________
my tennis blog
my youtube acct
my flickr acct my imgur acct picasa album acct

"Learning knows no differences of social caste or privilege. The mind is a radical democrat."
- Woodrow Wilson
fantic is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 05:53 AM   #129
country flag tie_breaker
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,663
tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Alternative Ranking System

This is just simple math to determine team rankings.
The criteria is based on the team with the highest # of ranked players.
Next is the average ranking based on those ranked players.

With 6 ranked players, U of F is ranked #1, although their ITA ranking is #2.
Ironically, USC's ranking of #4 is the same for both systems.

Oh...what do we have here...Stanford is ranked #2, although ITA's flawed ranking has the team ranked at #12.


Team---# Ranked Players---Ave Rank---ITA Rank

1: University of Florida---6---68---(2)
2: Stanford---5---48---(12)
3: UCLA---5---72---(7)
4: University of Southern California---4---29---(5)
5: California---4---32---(9)
6: North Carolina---4---34---(1)
7: Duke University---4---72---(11)
8: University of Alabama---4---75---(8)
9: Clemson University---3---27---(13)
10: University of Georgia---3---36---(3)
11: Texas A&M University---3---49---(4)
12: University of Michigan---3---60---(6)
13: University of Miami (Florida)---3---83---(10)
14: Florida State University---3---91---(32)
15: University of Tennessee---2---28---(29)
16: University of Texas at Austin---2---37---(26)
17: University of Virginia---2---45---(17)
18: Pepperdine---2---50---(71)
19: Rice University---2---57---(20)
20: UNLV---2---60---(61)
21: University of Arkansas---2---61---(50)
22: TCU---2---73---(25)
23: Vanderbilt University---2---75---(18)
24: North Carolina State---2---81---(44)
25: Northwestern University---2---86---(16)
26: Yale University---2---88---(35)
27: Georgia Tech---2---92---(23)
28: University of South Carolina---2---94---(30)
29: University of Illinois---2---106---(47)
30: Indiana University-Bloomington---2---108---(34)
31: Baylor University---1---10---(28)
32: University of Nebraska---1---11---(14)
33: University of Tulsa---1---14---(24)
34: Kansas State---1---16---(52)
35: Saint Mary's College of California---1---19---(40)
36: Arizona State University---1---21---(22)
37: University of Kentucky---1---22---(42)
38: Auburn University---1---23---(19)
39: Santa Clara University---1---28---(58)
40: University of Notre Dame---1---39---(21)
41: Georgia State University---1---41---(0)
42: University of Mississippi---1---44---(39)
43: Univ. of Memphis---1---48---(33)
44: San Jose State University---1---51---(72)
45: Tulane University---1---58---(46)
46: Penn State University---1---60---(43)
47: Ohio State University---1---62---(62)
48: Oklahoma State University---1---63---(37)
49: Columbia University---1---64---(65)
50: University of Arizona---1---65---(67)
51: University of Oklahoma---1---69---(36)
52: Virginia Commonwealth University---1---72---(38)
53: SMU---1---74---(51)
54: University of San Diego---1---78---(54)
55: Univ. of San Francisco---1---80---(0)
56: Univ. of Missouri, Columbia---1---81---(56)
57: DePaul University---1---84---(0)
58: UC Irvine---1---87---(31)
59: University of Utah---1---92---(53)
60: Texas Tech University---1---93---(15)
61: University of Iowa---1---96---(0)
62: Wake Forest University---1---99---(0)
63: University of South Florida---1---103---(57)
64: College of William and Mary---1---116---(49)
65: Louisiana State University---1---117---(64)
66: Stony Brook University---1---118---(0)
67: UC Davis---1---121---(0)
68: University of Central Florida---1---124---(0)
69: Princeton University---1---125---(73)
tie_breaker is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 06:09 AM   #130
country flag tie_breaker
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,663
tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Here's another look, but this time to make it a more level playing field, I took out Florida's 5th and 6th ranked player, Stanford's 5th ranked player, and UCLA's 5th ranked player, so we could see the highest average ranking of the top 4 ranked players.

No surprise seeing USC at #1. Both Cal and Stanford make the biggest jumps by climbing 7 spots.




Team---# Ranked Players---Ave Rank---ITA Rank

1: University of Southern California---4---29---(5)
2: California---4---32---(9)
3: North Carolina---4---34---(1)
4: Stanford---4---37---(12)
5: University of Florida---4---41---(2)
6: UCLA---4---62---(7)
7: Duke University---4---72---(11)
8: University of Alabama---4---75---(8)
9: Clemson University---3---27---(13)
10: University of Georgia---3---36---(3)
11: Texas A&M University---3---49---(4)
12: University of Michigan---3---60---(6)
13: University of Miami (Florida)---3---83---(10)
14: Florida State University---3---91---(32)
15: University of Tennessee---2---28---(29)
16: University of Texas at Austin---2---37---(26)
17: University of Virginia---2---45---(17)
18: Pepperdine---2---50---(71)
19: Rice University---2---57---(20)
20: UNLV---2---60---(61)
21: University of Arkansas---2---61---(50)
22: TCU---2---73---(25)
23: Vanderbilt University---2---75---(18)
24: North Carolina State---2---81---(44)
25: Northwestern University---2---86---(16)
26: Yale University---2---88---(35)
27: Georgia Tech---2---92---(23)
28: University of South Carolina---2---94---(30)
29: University of Illinois---2---106---(47)
30: Indiana University-Bloomington---2---108---(34)
31: Baylor University---1---10---(28)
32: University of Nebraska---1---11---(14)
33: University of Tulsa---1---14---(24)
34: Kansas State---1---16---(52)
35: Saint Mary's College of California---1---19---(40)
36: Arizona State University---1---21---(22)
37: University of Kentucky---1---22---(42)
38: Auburn University---1---23---(19)
39: Santa Clara University---1---28---(58)
40: University of Notre Dame---1---39---(21)
41: Georgia State University---1---41---(0)
42: University of Mississippi---1---44---(39)
43: Univ. of Memphis---1---48---(33)
44: San Jose State University---1---51---(72)
45: Tulane University---1---58---(46)
46: Penn State University---1---60---(43)
47: Ohio State University---1---62---(62)
48: Oklahoma State University---1---63---(37)
49: Columbia University---1---64---(65)
50: University of Arizona---1---65---(67)
51: University of Oklahoma---1---69---(36)
52: Virginia Commonwealth University---1---72---(38)
53: SMU---1---74---(51)
54: University of San Diego---1---78---(54)
55: Univ. of San Francisco---1---80---(0)
56: Univ. of Missouri, Columbia---1---81---(56)
57: DePaul University---1---84---(0)
58: UC Irvine---1---87---(31)
59: University of Utah---1---92---(53)
60: Texas Tech University---1---93---(15)
61: University of Iowa---1---96---(0)
62: Wake Forest University---1---99---(0)
63: University of South Florida---1---103---(57)
64: College of William and Mary---1---116---(49)
65: Louisiana State University---1---117---(64)
66: Stony Brook University---1---118---(0)
67: UC Davis---1---121---(0)
68: University of Central Florida---1---124---(0)
69: Princeton University---1---125---(73)
tie_breaker is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 06:15 AM   #131
country flag fantic
esprits d'élite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,032
fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ranking 2012-3

I've done the same as you, counting the # of players on each team, but didn't actually think to make a ranking based on this, nice work!

I think I like yours more, since Pac 12 really rules by your system and especially the 2nd one since USC is #1
__________________
my tennis blog
my youtube acct
my flickr acct my imgur acct picasa album acct

"Learning knows no differences of social caste or privilege. The mind is a radical democrat."
- Woodrow Wilson

Last edited by fantic : Apr 18th, 2013 at 03:45 PM.
fantic is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 03:02 PM   #132
country flag gouci
Senior Member
 
gouci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 4,003
gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all gouci is a name known to all
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
Oh...what do we have here...Stanford is ranked #2, although ITA's flawed ranking has the team ranked at #12.
Let's get something straight.

The ITA computer doesn't rank teams based on potential but based on actual results as it should be.

Stanford is ranked #12 not because the ITA computer thinks they're the 12th best team in the country, but because the computer thinks they have the 12th best record/resume.

The ITA ranking is not flawed here. The only thing flawed is tie_breaker's comprehension of the rankings.


P. S.
tie_breaker I don't have a beef against you so stop your sniping on other threads.
My advice is don't pick a fight that you can't win.
gouci is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 03:17 PM   #133
country flag beachman49
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 134
beachman49 has disabled reputation
Re: Ranking 2012-3

[quote= Tie breaker]Here's another look, but this time to make it a more level playing field, I took out Florida's 5th and 6th ranked player, Stanford's 5th ranked player, and UCLA's 5th ranked player, so we could see the highest average ranking of the top 4 ranked players.

No surprise seeing USC at #1. Both Cal and Stanford make the biggest jumps by climbing 7 spots.





Ummm, then we should just eliminate team scoring? Ask Pepperdine how that's working out this year.

This is THE DUMBEST most stuck up thing I have ever read.

Under this theory, the LA Lakers are # 2 in the country behind Miami as they have the 2nd most superstars and 2nd highest payroll. How has that worked out. You have to PLAY THE GAME/MATCH.

The thing most flawed is the ITA individual rankings. One fluke win and you are ranked (opponent is ill, just not feeling it one time or gets hurt). UC Davis' # 1 is not good... but has two Top 60 wins... they both RETIRED so she is ranked. NOW THAT IS A FLAWED SYSTEM.

Quite frankly with so many schools now pulling their players after they get to 4 points, the individual rankings are a mess anyway. My guess is that the NCAA will eventually dump the individuals to shorten match length and save money. Stupid idea too but you have to play all the matches.

And sadly for some 'power schools' who have crappy bottom ends and can't post 4 points, those poor pathetic non-football schools will continue to outrank your brand.

I can't believe someone actually posts this. It's the final score, not your super star. Ask Kobe Bryant.

Gouci.. I'm scared. We agree.

Last edited by beachman49 : Apr 18th, 2013 at 03:23 PM.
beachman49 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 03:48 PM   #134
country flag fantic
esprits d'élite
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,032
fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by gouci View Post
Let's get something straight.

The ITA computer doesn't rank teams based on potential but based on actual results as it should be.

Stanford is ranked #12 not because the ITA computer thinks they're the 12th best team in the country, but because the computer thinks they have the 12th best record/resume.

The ITA ranking is not flawed here. The only thing flawed is tie_breaker's comprehension of the rankings.


P. S.
tie_breaker I don't have a beef against you so stop your sniping on other threads.
My advice is don't pick a fight that you can't win.
[quote=beachman49;26884770]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tie breaker
Here's another look, but this time to make it a more level playing field, I took out Florida's 5th and 6th ranked player, Stanford's 5th ranked player, and UCLA's 5th ranked player, so we could see the highest average ranking of the top 4 ranked players.

No surprise seeing USC at #1. Both Cal and Stanford make the biggest jumps by climbing 7 spots.





Ummm, then we should just eliminate team scoring? Ask Pepperdine how that's working out this year.

This is THE DUMBEST most stuck up thing I have ever read.

Under this theory, the LA Lakers are # 2 in the country behind Miami as they have the 2nd most superstars and 2nd highest payroll. How has that worked out. You have to PLAY THE GAME/MATCH.

The thing most flawed is the ITA individual rankings. One fluke win and you are ranked (opponent is ill, just not feeling it one time or gets hurt). UC Davis' # 1 is not good... but has two Top 60 wins... they both RETIRED so she is ranked. NOW THAT IS A FLAWED SYSTEM.

Quite frankly with so many schools now pulling their players after they get to 4 points, the individual rankings are a mess anyway. My guess is that the NCAA will eventually dump the individuals to shorten match length and save money. Stupid idea too but you have to play all the matches.

And sadly for some 'power schools' who have crappy bottom ends and can't post 4 points, those poor pathetic non-football schools will continue to outrank your brand.

I can't believe someone actually posts this. It's the final score, not your super star. Ask Kobe Bryant.

Gouci.. I'm scared. We agree.
Why such hostile reactions

tiebreaker didn't base the ranking on 'reputation', he based it on the individual ranking, so it's not totally subjective here:

I thought it was a fresh approach
__________________
my tennis blog
my youtube acct
my flickr acct my imgur acct picasa album acct

"Learning knows no differences of social caste or privilege. The mind is a radical democrat."
- Woodrow Wilson
fantic is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 18th, 2013, 11:56 PM   #135
country flag tie_breaker
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,663
tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by gouci View Post
Let's get something straight.

The ITA computer doesn't rank teams based on potential but based on actual results as it should be.

Stanford is ranked #12 not because the ITA computer thinks they're the 12th best team in the country, but because the computer thinks they have the 12th best record/resume.

The ITA ranking is not flawed here. The only thing flawed is tie_breaker's comprehension of the rankings.


P. S.
tie_breaker I don't have a beef against you so stop your sniping on other threads.
My advice is don't pick a fight that you can't win.
You and beachman take the rankings way too seriously...lighten up and go easy on the coffee
tie_breaker is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios