Parenting Aces says doubles only played if singles does not decide it. - TennisForum.com
TennisForum.com   Wagerline.com MensTennisForums.com TennisUniverse.com
TennisForum.com is the premier Women's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
Reply

Old Aug 16th, 2012, 06:07 PM   #1
country flag 2nd_serve
Senior Member
 
2nd_serve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,134
2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all
Parenting Aces says doubles only played if singles does not decide it.

Parenting Aces says the changes would eliminate doubles unless the match was tied at 3 all.

Fantic, what do you think?



When we are confronted by challenges, we have a choice: sit back and accept them (glass half empty approach) OR take action and attempt to turn them into something positive (glass half full approach). Concerning this week’s announcement by the NCAA that it is changing the format of the Division 1 year-end tennis tournament, I’m choosing to join several of the current, future, and recently-graduated players and take action.

In a nutshell, NCAA has decided that, during its year-end tourney, (1) players will have no on-court warmup; (2) the six singles matches will play first and will play a 10-point tiebreaker in lieu of a third set; (3) changeovers will last 60 seconds instead of the current 90; (4) if an overall winner isn’t determined via the singles matches, then – and only then – will the three doubles matches be played after a 5-minute break; and (5) doubles matches will be one 6-game set with a 7-point tiebreaker played at 6-all. These changes go into effect beginning September 1, 2012, for the 2013 Championships. To read the complete report from the July NCAA meeting, click here. The report includes a list of the committee members in attendance along with their university affiliation.

Hayley Carter, a high school senior who recently committed to play for UNC, emailed me the following: “Although I sincerely appreciate all the NCAA does for us in providing us with scholarships to play the sport we love, I do not agree with the new rules they have put in place. My plans are to use college tennis as a stepping-stone into professional tennis. Looking at the WTA success of former college players, such as Irina Falconi and more recently Mallory Burdette, I have no doubt that I can use the experience of college tennis to help me make it on the pro tour, but with the recent rule changes it will make it that much more difficult.”

Hayley goes on: “No matter if it results in a win or a loss, third sets are times when players give everything they have when they have no energy left, when they learn to fight and compete for every point no matter the adversity, and when, most importantly, they grow as a player. In my opinion, the change to a 10-point tiebreaker greatly diminishes all of the things that are learned through a hard-fought third set. Skill and hard work become more easily replaced with luck, when just a few points can have such a big impact on determining the outcome of a match.”

Hayley’s sentiments are echoed by many of her tennis compadres as evidenced by the number of members (over 2400 after less than one day) and posts on the *OFFICIAL* Against the changes to NCAA tennis Facebook group. These young players are outraged by the seemingly revenue-driven changes to the sport they have devoted over half their lives learning and mastering, all for the chance to play at the collegiate – and maybe professional – level. All the NCAA is doing is “dumbing down” our sport, eliminating the fitness factor for players, and making college tennis a less attractive option for our juniors.

Wise words from another collegiate player: “The bottom line is in tennis you are either going to have fans or you aren’t. Don’t keep using that excuse as a way to change the rules. Fans will stay whether the matches are two hours or ten hours. Those who aren’t fans don’t show up anyway. Tennis is one of the few sports that doesn’t have a clock involved and that is what makes it special. Do you think the matches between Nadal and Djokovic, Federer and Nadal would have been as inspiring if they played a 10 point breaker for the 5th set?”

I hope you’ll join me on Sunday’s radio show to discuss these changes and what, if anything, we tennis parents can do to convince NCAA to overturn them before any long-term damage is done to junior tennis in the U.S. My guests on Sunday’s show are Drake Bernstein, Assistant Women’s Tennis Coach at the University of Georgia, and Colette Lewis, tennis journalist and creator of ZooTennis.com. Please plan to tune in and call in (714-583-6853) so we can try to figure out the next step.
2nd_serve is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old Aug 16th, 2012, 06:31 PM   #2
country flag fantic
.
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 11,088
fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute fantic has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Parenting Aces says doubles only played if singles does not decide it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd_serve View Post
Parenting Aces says the changes would eliminate doubles unless the match was tied at 3 all.

Fantic, what do you think?



When we are confronted by challenges, we have a choice: sit back and accept them (glass half empty approach) OR take action and attempt to turn them into something positive (glass half full approach). Concerning this week’s announcement by the NCAA that it is changing the format of the Division 1 year-end tennis tournament, I’m choosing to join several of the current, future, and recently-graduated players and take action.

In a nutshell, NCAA has decided that, during its year-end tourney, (1) players will have no on-court warmup; (2) the six singles matches will play first and will play a 10-point tiebreaker in lieu of a third set; (3) changeovers will last 60 seconds instead of the current 90; (4) if an overall winner isn’t determined via the singles matches, then – and only then – will the three doubles matches be played after a 5-minute break; and (5) doubles matches will be one 6-game set with a 7-point tiebreaker played at 6-all. These changes go into effect beginning September 1, 2012, for the 2013 Championships. To read the complete report from the July NCAA meeting, click here. The report includes a list of the committee members in attendance along with their university affiliation.

Hayley Carter, a high school senior who recently committed to play for UNC, emailed me the following: “Although I sincerely appreciate all the NCAA does for us in providing us with scholarships to play the sport we love, I do not agree with the new rules they have put in place. My plans are to use college tennis as a stepping-stone into professional tennis. Looking at the WTA success of former college players, such as Irina Falconi and more recently Mallory Burdette, I have no doubt that I can use the experience of college tennis to help me make it on the pro tour, but with the recent rule changes it will make it that much more difficult.”

Hayley goes on: “No matter if it results in a win or a loss, third sets are times when players give everything they have when they have no energy left, when they learn to fight and compete for every point no matter the adversity, and when, most importantly, they grow as a player. In my opinion, the change to a 10-point tiebreaker greatly diminishes all of the things that are learned through a hard-fought third set. Skill and hard work become more easily replaced with luck, when just a few points can have such a big impact on determining the outcome of a match.”

Hayley’s sentiments are echoed by many of her tennis compadres as evidenced by the number of members (over 2400 after less than one day) and posts on the *OFFICIAL* Against the changes to NCAA tennis Facebook group. These young players are outraged by the seemingly revenue-driven changes to the sport they have devoted over half their lives learning and mastering, all for the chance to play at the collegiate – and maybe professional – level. All the NCAA is doing is “dumbing down” our sport, eliminating the fitness factor for players, and making college tennis a less attractive option for our juniors.

Wise words from another collegiate player: “The bottom line is in tennis you are either going to have fans or you aren’t. Don’t keep using that excuse as a way to change the rules. Fans will stay whether the matches are two hours or ten hours. Those who aren’t fans don’t show up anyway. Tennis is one of the few sports that doesn’t have a clock involved and that is what makes it special. Do you think the matches between Nadal and Djokovic, Federer and Nadal would have been as inspiring if they played a 10 point breaker for the 5th set?”

I hope you’ll join me on Sunday’s radio show to discuss these changes and what, if anything, we tennis parents can do to convince NCAA to overturn them before any long-term damage is done to junior tennis in the U.S. My guests on Sunday’s show are Drake Bernstein, Assistant Women’s Tennis Coach at the University of Georgia, and Colette Lewis, tennis journalist and creator of ZooTennis.com. Please plan to tune in and call in (714-583-6853) so we can try to figure out the next step.
why only me

Not playing dbls will be so boring (And without the dbls point, the possibility of an upset will be even slimmer..)
Who doesn't luv dbls?! And the game tempo is fast even, so won't featuring dbls prominently rather HELP inducing fans? If they thought limiting the playing time might help, dunno why they're backseating the dbls?
__________________
my tennis blog
my youtube acct
my flickr acct my imgur acct picasa album acct
"Learning knows no differences of social caste or privilege. The mind is a radical democrat."
- Woodrow Wilson
Nil admirari (never enthuse over things).
- Horace, Epistles
fantic is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16th, 2012, 06:36 PM   #3
country flag 2nd_serve
Senior Member
 
2nd_serve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,134
2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all
Re: Parenting Aces says doubles only played if singles does not decide it.

Because you vocally care about doubles even more then the rest of us, I think.

For limiting time, I think changing the order does work. We see teams agreeing to it when rain threatens, and it is important to get the match in. Probabilisticly, often the doubles is not needed to decide the match.
2nd_serve is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16th, 2012, 06:38 PM   #4
country flag 2nd_serve
Senior Member
 
2nd_serve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,134
2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all
Re: Parenting Aces says doubles only played if singles does not decide it.

without doubles, I think there could be more upsets. Doubles before singles allows a player to get her head together and warmup her strokes, with less fear that a couple mistakes will decide.
2nd_serve is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 16th, 2012, 09:14 PM   #5
country flag 3gtennis
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 97
3gtennis is an unknown quantity at this point
Re: Parenting Aces says doubles only played if singles does not decide it.

women's tennis already tried singles first and it was terrible. doubles is the most exciting and high energy part of tennis. you do not have to try that model to see, it has already been done.
3gtennis is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 17th, 2012, 03:59 AM   #6
country flag urklerlay
Senior Member
 
urklerlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 912
urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future urklerlay has a brilliant future
Re: Parenting Aces says doubles only played if singles does not decide it.

Ridiculous!! Outrageous!! Doubles is the best part about College Tennis in my opinion.

The energy, enthusiasm, and camaraderie that isn't displayed during singles.

Very disappointing.
__________________
"The fifth set has nothing to do with tennis, it is all about heart." --Boris Becker

Twitter
2013 US OPEN
Flickr
urklerlay is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios