DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections - TennisForum.com
TennisForum.com   Wagerline.com MensTennisForums.com TennisUniverse.com
TennisForum.com is the premier Women's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!
Reply

Old Apr 30th, 2014, 11:57 PM   #1
country flag knoxt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 946
knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold
DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Singles, doubles selections announced for DI Women's Tennis championships
NCAA.com
Last Updated - Apr 30, 2014 18:00 EDT

http://www.ncaa.com/news/tennis-wome...-womens-tennis


Contact |Archive |RSS
INDIANAPOLIS --The NCAA Division I Women's Tennis Subcommittee has selected the 64 singles players and 32 doubles teams that will compete in the 2014 NCAA Division I Women's Tennis championships.

The singles and doubles competition will be conducted May 21-26 at the Dan Magill Tennis Complex in Athens, Georgia, following the conclusion of the team championship, which runs from May 15-20. Georgia will serve as host.

All matches shall be the best-of-three sets. Regular scoring and a 12-point tiebreaker at six- games-all will be used for all matches.

Automatic qualification into the Division I singles championships is awarded to any conference with one or more eligible singles players ranked in the ITA Top 125 for eligible/entered singles players. For conferences with more than one singles player within the ITA Top 125 eligible/entered singles players, the subcommittee applies the NCAA selection criteria to determine which student-athlete is the automatic qualifier from those conferences. All singles players must have a minimum of 13 completed singles matches, with six matches in the spring, in order to be selected as an automatic qualifier or an at-large selection.

Automatic qualification into the Division I doubles championships is awarded to any conference with one or more eligible doubles teams ranked in the ITA Top 60 for eligible/entered doubles teams. For conferences with more than one doubles team within the ITA Top 60 eligible/entered doubles teams, the subcommittee applies the NCAA selection criteria to determine which doubles team is the automatic qualifier from those conferences. All doubles teams must have a minimum of 10 completed doubles matches, with five matches in the spring, in order to be selected as an automatic qualifier or an at-large selection.

SINGLES

Automatic qualifications (15), listed alphabetically by conference:

American Athletic -- Loreta Alonso, South Florida
ACC -- Jamie Loeb, North Carolina
Atlantic 10 -- Yukako Noi, VCU
Big 12 -- Breaunna Addison, Texas
Big East -- Ana Vladutu, DePaul
Big South -- Rokia Sacko, Gardner-Webb
Big Ten -- Emina Bektas, Michigan
Big West -- Cindy Nguyen, Hawaii
Conference USA -- Klara Vyskocilova, Tulane
Ivy -- Alanna Wolff, Princeton
Mountain West -- Laura Antonana Iriarte, San Diego State
Pac-12 -- Robin Anderson, UCLA
SEC -- Lauren Herring, Georgia
Sun Belt -- Abigail Tere-Apisah, Georgia State
West Coast -- Jenny Jullien, St. Mary’s (Calif.)

At-large selections (49), listed alphabetically by last name:

Kristie Ahn, Stanford
Frances Altick, Vanderbilt
Jennifer Brady, UCLA
Pleun Burgmans, Auburn
Beatrice Capra, Duke
Hayley Carter, North Carolina
Alex Cercone, Florida
Lynn Chi, California
Danielle Collins, Virginia
Veronica Corning, Northwestern
Taylor Davidson, Stanford
Caroline Doyle, Stanford
Julia Elbaba, Virginia
Silvia Garcia, Georgia
Saska Gavrilovska, Texas A&M
Kiah Generette, Baylor
Quinn Gleason, Notre Dame
Ester Goldfeld, Duke
Lorraine Guillermo, Pepperdine
Krista Hardebeck, Stanford
Olivia Janowicz, Florida
Romy Kölzer, Clemson
Yana Koroleva, Clemson
Maho Kowase, Georgia
Desirae Krawczyk, Arizona State
Katie Le, Santa Clara
Viktoriya Lushkova, Oklahoma State
Hanna Mar, Duke
Kyle McPhillips, UCLA
Brianna Morgan, Florida
Stephanie Nauta, Virginia
Petra Niedermayerova, Kansas State
Belinda Niu, Northwestern
Georgiana Patrasc, Mississippi State
Caroline Price, North Carolina
Nadia Ravita, Kentucky
Jordaan Sanford, Baylor
Zoë Scandalis, Southern California
Anett Schutting, California
Lacey Smyth, Arizona
Denise Starr, California
Cristina Stancu, Texas A&M
Zsofi Susanyi, California
Stefanie Tan, TCU
Ellen Tsay, Stanford
Chanelle Van Nguyen, UCLA
Stephanie Wagner, Miami (Fla.)
Ronit Yurovsky, Michigan
Carol Zhao, Stanford

Alternates:

1. Giuliana Olmos, Southern California
2. Eve Repic, Tennessee
3. Maegan Manasse, California
4. Sydney Campbell, Vanderbilt
5. Mary Anne Daines, Alabama
6. Georgina Sellyn, Vanderbilt
7. Kourtney Keegan, Florida
8. Kelsey Laurente, Miami (Fla.)

Seeds 1-8:

1. Jamie Loeb, North Carolina
2. Robin Anderson, UCLA
3. Kristie Ahn, Stanford
4. Julie Elbaba, Virginia
5. Beatrice Capra, Duke
6. Lauren Herring, Georgia
7. Hayley Carter, North Carolina
8. Jennifer Brady, UCLA

Seeds 9-16, listed alphabetically by last name:

Breaunna Addison, Texas
Emina Bektas, Michigan
Silvia Garcia, Georgia
Olivia Janowicz, Florida
Jenny Jullien, St. Mary’s (Calif.)
Anett Schutting, California
Cristina Stancu, Texas A&M
Chanelle Van Nguyen, UCLA



DOUBLES

Automatic qualifications (10), listed alphabetically by conference:

ACC -- Jamie Loeb and Hayley Carter, North Carolina
American Athletic -- Julia Fellerhoff and Rebecca Shine, Louisville
Big 12 -- Victoria Kisialeva and Blair Shankle, Baylor
Big Ten -- Brooke Bolender and Emina Bektas, Michigan
Conference USA -- Natalie Beazant and Liat Zimmermann, Rice
Ivy -- Bianca Sanon and Kanika Vaidya, Columbia
Pac-12 -- Jennifer Brady and Robin Anderson, UCLA
SEC -- Lauren Herring and Maho Kowase, Georgia
Sun Belt -- Abigail Tere-Apisah and Masa Grgan Georgia State
West Coast -- Michaela Capannolo and Yuki Chiang, Pepperdine

At-large selections (22), listed alphabetically by institution:

Erin Routliffe and Maya Jansen, Alabama
Emily Flickinger and Pleun Burgmans, Auburn
Beatrice Gumulya and Yana Koroleva, Clemson
Beatrice Capra and Hanna Mar, Duke
Olivia Janowicz and Kourtney Keegan, Florida
Belinda Woolcock and Sofie Oyen, Florida
Daneika Borthwick and Kerrie Cartwright, Florida State
Kate Fuller and Silvia Garcia, Georgia
Kendal Woodard and Megan Kurey, Georgia Tech
Caitlin McGraw and CeCe Witten, Kentucky
Monique Albuquerque and Clementina Riobueno Miami (Fla.)
Whitney Kay and Caroline Price, North Carolina
Veronica Corning and Alicia Barnett, Northwestern
Quinn Gleason and Britney Sanders, Notre Dame
Dominika Kanakova and Elixane Lechemia, South Carolina
Brynn Boren and Zoë Katz, Southern California
Zoë Scandalis and Giuliana Olmos, Southern California
Kristie Ahn and Carol Zhao, Stanford
Stefania Hristov and Cristina Stancu, Texas A&M
Catherine Harrison and Kyle McPhillips, UCLA
Courtney Colton and Lauren Mira, Vanderbilt
Julia Elbaba and Rachel Pierson, Virginia

Alternates:

1. Beatrice Gumulya* and Jessy Rompies, Clemson
2. Ester Goldfeld and Alyssa Smith, Duke
3. Maddie Kobelt and Valeria Salazar Garza, Syracuse
4. Danielle Spielmann and Mary Anne Daines, Alabama
5. Kelsey Laurente and Melissa Bolivar, Miami (Fla.)
6. Lynn Chi and Anett Schutting, California

*If a student-athlete would have been selected to the championship with two different partners, that student-athlete has the ability to be an alternate in the draw with the other partner. This only comes into play if the student-athlete not listed on both teams is unable to participate.

Seeds 1-4:

1. Jennifer Brady and Robin Anderson, UCLA
2. Lauren Herring and Maho Kowase, Georgia
3. Jamie Loeb and Hayley Carter, North Carolina
4. Erin Routliffe and Maya Jansen, Alabama

Seeds 5-8, listed alphabetically by institution:

Beatrice Capra and Hanna Mar, Duke
Kendall Woodard and Megan Kurey, Georgia Tech
Monique Albuquerque and Clementina Riobueno, Miami (Fla.)
Julia Elbaba and Rachel Pierson, Virginia
knoxt is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old May 1st, 2014, 12:00 AM   #2
country flag knoxt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 946
knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Wow, how did Stanford get six players in? Krista and Doyle barely made it.
knoxt is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2014, 12:03 AM   #3
country flag knoxt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 946
knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Four out of the top 8 singles seeds represented by ACC, followed by three selections from Pac 12.
knoxt is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old May 1st, 2014, 12:26 AM   #4
country flag tie_breaker
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,715
tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Quote:
Originally Posted by knoxt View Post
Wow, how did Stanford get six players in? Krista and Doyle barely made it.
Because they are wonderful...
tie_breaker is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 04:01 AM   #5
country flag knoxt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 946
knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

I'm trying to figure out how Stanford's #5 and #6 singles managed to get into the NCAAs. I think it was quality wins against ranked opponents in pre-season play.
knoxt is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 12:11 PM   #6
country flag slickshoes510
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,483
slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light slickshoes510 is a glorious beacon of light
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Quote:
Originally Posted by knoxt View Post
I'm trying to figure out how Stanford's #5 and #6 singles managed to get into the NCAAs. I think it was quality wins against ranked opponents in pre-season play.
Ellen had good results in the preseason.

She won at Freeman, but benefited from 2 walkovers (Capra defaulted in the round of 16 and Robin defaulted in the finals). Also, Brady retired from their match in the semifinals. This was the tournament where there were several withdrawals. It was an odd tournament!

She also go to the round of 16 at the Northwest Regional and to the semi's at the SMC Invitational.

As for Doyle, she got to the finals of the SMC Invitational, semifinals of the Northwest Regionals, and quarterfinals of Freeman.

I'm more trying to figure out how Krista managed to get ranked so high. She only won 1 match out of 3 at Riviera/ITA All-American, which was over Scandalis which may be what helped with her ranking. She only got to the round of 16 at Northwest Regional. She only got to the round of 16 at Freeman. Other than that, her other good win comes against Alex Cercone in the Florida dual match. I guess those two wins were enough.
slickshoes510 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 12:17 PM   #7
country flag tie_breaker
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,715
tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Quote:
Originally Posted by slickshoes510 View Post
Ellen had good results in the preseason.

She won at Freeman, but benefited from 2 walkovers (Capra defaulted in the round of 16 and Robin defaulted in the finals). Also, Brady retired from their match in the semifinals. This was the tournament where there were several withdrawals. It was an odd tournament!

She also go to the round of 16 at the Northwest Regional and to the semi's at the SMC Invitational.

As for Doyle, she got to the finals of the SMC Invitational, semifinals of the Northwest Regionals, and quarterfinals of Freeman.

I'm more trying to figure out how Krista managed to get ranked so high. She only won 1 match out of 3 at Riviera/ITA All-American, which was over Scandalis which may be what helped with her ranking. She only got to the round of 16 at Northwest Regional. She only got to the round of 16 at Freeman. Other than that, her other good win comes against Alex Cercone in the Florida dual match. I guess those two wins were enough.
Yeah I was wondering about Krista too, who was 6-9 against ranked players, while both Tsay and Doyle were 6-4. Krista was 15-11. I guess playing #2 has its benefits.
tie_breaker is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old May 2nd, 2014, 11:22 PM   #8
country flag knoxt
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Manhattan Beach, CA
Posts: 946
knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold knoxt is a splendid one to behold
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Krista has been very inconsistent, so that's quite puzzling too how she made it. But your rank movement is correlated to that of the girls you play (regardless of a win or loss), hence playing #2 singles gives that benefit. If you lose a #30 player who moves up to #10 the following week, your ranking will also go up. It's just quite messed up and somewhat not logical...
knoxt is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2014, 03:49 AM   #9
country flag Bigmanserve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 109
Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Quote:
Originally Posted by knoxt View Post
Krista has been very inconsistent, so that's quite puzzling too how she made it. But your rank movement is correlated to that of the girls you play (regardless of a win or loss), hence playing #2 singles gives that benefit. If you lose a #30 player who moves up to #10 the following week, your ranking will also go up. It's just quite messed up and somewhat not logical...
Actually Krista making it makes perfect sense. True the ranking system is correlated with whom you play like everyone. The advantage of playing #2 especially for a program like Stanford and their sched., is that you don't play very many low or unranked players. Krista's record isnt very good, yet its good enough to barely make it ranked #51. Krista's worse loss was to a player ranked 101 at Rice. her best win is against Zoe S. from USC who is currently ranked 19. ( She also has a more recent win against Alex C. from Florida ranked #28.)True her ranking will move up or down according to the wins or losses of the players she beat or loses to. But if she were to lose to unranked players, her ranking would drop like a brick. So ranked #51 makes sense according to her best wins and worse losses.
Bigmanserve is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2014, 06:06 AM   #10
country flag tie_breaker
Senior Member
 
tie_breaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,715
tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold tie_breaker is a splendid one to behold
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigmanserve View Post
Actually Krista making it makes perfect sense. True the ranking system is correlated with whom you play like everyone. The advantage of playing #2 especially for a program like Stanford and their sched., is that you don't play very many low or unranked players. Krista's record isnt very good, yet its good enough to barely make it ranked #51. Krista's worse loss was to a player ranked 101 at Rice. her best win is against Zoe S. from USC who is currently ranked 19. ( She also has a more recent win against Alex C. from Florida ranked #28.)True her ranking will move up or down according to the wins or losses of the players she beat or loses to. But if she were to lose to unranked players, her ranking would drop like a brick. So ranked #51 makes sense according to her best wins and worse losses.
That loss to #101 at Rice wasn't really a bad performance. She came back strong in the second set, but lost in the 3rd set super-tiebreaker.

I think if she wasn't playing under the experimental rules, she would have won that match.

Actually, she was 6-11 against ranked players and all losses were against ranked players.

Second worst loss was to #55, so all other losses were to higher ranked players.
tie_breaker is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2014, 09:24 PM   #11
country flag Bigmanserve
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 109
Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice Bigmanserve is just really nice
Re: DI Women's Tennis Championships - Singles & Doubles Selections

Yes. So Krista making the NCAA's is well deserved. 6-11 at #2 vs ranked players is a much better result than 11-6 at #3 against mostly unranked players.
Bigmanserve is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios