 |
|
Oct 28th, 2006, 11:17 PM
|
#1
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,156
|
Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
based on their 06 record and game
1.(3) Amelie Mauresmo: she has two slams but her overall performance is not so great for me
2. (1) Justine Henin-Hardenne: all slams finals
3. (2) Maria Sharapova: US Open and 3 tier I
11. (10) Nicole Vaidisova: for me she is a Top Ten
12. (8 - 10) Jelena Jankovic: impressive second half of the year
21. (17) Tatiana Golovin: Right now she is better than injured davenport and myskina, and way too better than bartoli and groennefeld
31. (top 50) Maria Kirilenko: she is not winning
36. (top 100) Martina Muller:
39. (top 50) Lucie Safarova: not winning
80. (top 150) Nicole Pratt:
what do you think? 
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
Oct 28th, 2006, 11:24 PM
|
#2
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,957
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
I don't think its fair to say that Martina and Nicole are outside the top 100, they have both reached 3rd round GS matches, Nicole reaching 2nd round of wimbledon too.
Martina Muller (49)
Tathiana Garbin (51)
Anastasia Yakimova (82)
|
|
|
Oct 28th, 2006, 11:28 PM
|
#3
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 25,202
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
all active players who have reached no.1 is actually their real ranking i reckon. but that's me personally.
davenport's ranked 18 at the moment & we all know she's better than that ranking, who wouldn't no. she should be ranked in the top 5 at least.
|
|
|
Oct 28th, 2006, 11:30 PM
|
#4
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 14,310
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
I'm sick and tired of posters insulting Martina Muller and Nicole Pratt.  At least they can keep the ball in play unlike so many mindless, stupid players who just smack everything into the net or the fence or outside the stadium.
|
|
|
Oct 28th, 2006, 11:39 PM
|
#5
|
|
King
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flux
Posts: 25,825
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
Pironkova 63 now sould be top 50
__________________
Ludmila.
|
|
|
Oct 28th, 2006, 11:41 PM
|
#6
|
|
*
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 22,204
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
Davenport should be #4 after the Belgians and Sharapova...
__________________
Ivanovic * Kvitova * Serena
|
|
|
Oct 28th, 2006, 11:42 PM
|
#7
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 6,011
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
muller.. so wrong!
__________________
Maju terus Tenis Indonesia!
|
|
|
Oct 28th, 2006, 11:55 PM
|
#8
|
|
Sabatini lover Forever
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 14,728
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
Quote:
Originally Posted by nolop
based on their 06 record and game
1.(3) Amelie Mauresmo: she has two slams but her overall performance is not so great for me
2. (1) Justine Henin-Hardenne: all slams finals
3. (2) Maria Sharapova: US Open and 3 tier I
11. (10) Nicole Vaidisova: for me she is a Top Ten
12. (8 - 10) Jelena Jankovic: impressive second half of the year
21. (17) Tatiana Golovin: Right now she is better than injured davenport and myskina, and way too better than bartoli and groennefeld
31. (top 50) Maria Kirilenko: she is not winning
36. (top 100) Martina Muller:
39. (top 50) Lucie Safarova: not winning
80. (top 150) Nicole Pratt:
what do you think? 
|
2 GS > 1 GS and 3 Tier I
Thinking that Sharapova deserves one of the top two spots in the world in 2006 is ridiculous.
__________________
Gabriela Sabatini 2006 HOF
18 Grand Slam SF´s, Won 27 titles, 1 GS Sin, 1 GS in Dubs,2 Masters
Sabatini vs Martinez ?
Seasons in the top ten: Sabatini 10 Conchita 9
Straight Seasons in the top ten: Sabatini 10 Conchita 6
Seasons in the top 5: Sabatini 6 Conchita 5
Straight seasons in the top 5: Sabatini 6 Conchita 4
Tier II and above titles
Sabatini 24 Martinez 17
Record at the Masters
Sabatini has 2 titles 2 Runner up and 3 SF
Martinez has 0 titles, 0 RU, and 0 Sf
Record against the best players
Sabatini 40%  Martinez 21%
Head to Head
Sabatini leads 9-6 over Martinez
FWTT Hard 111(111 + ny)Carpet 104(104 + ny)Clay 107(107 + 4) Grass 100(100 ny)
|
|
|
Oct 29th, 2006, 12:00 AM
|
#9
|
|
16 Down, 7 To Go...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On The Dirt
Posts: 33,314
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
for the players that have played a full season, their rankings and results are in their own hands
__________________
I go out there with girls that wanna beat the fucking hell out of me.
They don't play patty-cake with me, they hate me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Akaniero
I hate how Serena is still so dominant.
|
|
|
|
Oct 29th, 2006, 12:15 AM
|
#10
|
|
-PREMIUM MEMBER-
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 12,156
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
Quote:
Originally Posted by spencercarlos
2 GS > 1 GS and 3 Tier I
Thinking that Sharapova deserves one of the top two spots in the world in 2006 is ridiculous.
|
is not ridiculous is just a thought 
Last edited by Nicolás89 : Oct 29th, 2006 at 12:20 AM.
|
|
|
Oct 29th, 2006, 12:18 AM
|
#11
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,912
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
Erakovic should be top 100 at the way shes playing recently (won 17 out of her last 18 matches including 2 titles and playing in another 50k final today)
|
|
|
Oct 29th, 2006, 12:45 AM
|
#12
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Seychelles
Posts: 7,975
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
If every player who won a couple of 25Ks and reached a 50K final was in the top 100, then we'd have a VERY overcrowded top 100. The highest ranked player Marina beat in those 25Ks was Casey ranked 180ish. Beijing on the other hand, while the win over Chan was relatively impressive, the whole draw is rather weak. I mean Tongsalee isn't even ranked in the top 300. Give Marina a bit more time before proclaiming her as top 100 already.
__________________
"I will right wrongs & triumph over evil ... & that means you!"
♥
0099 ... Eternal follower of the Golden Girl WTAWorld Survivor
~ Survivor Cambodia - The Ta Prohm Ruins ~
Jan-Apr 06
~ Survivor Aitutaki - The Blue Lagoon ~
Nov 06-Mar 07
Last edited by Erika_Angel : Oct 29th, 2006 at 12:51 AM.
|
|
|
Oct 29th, 2006, 12:47 AM
|
#13
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,912
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erika_Angel
If every player who won a couple of 25Ks and reached a 50K final was in the top 100, then we'd have a VERY overcrowded top 100.
|
No but the point im saying is that shes only been playing well for the the last 2 months, if you she had played like this the whole year (eg won something like 7 25k titles and maybe even entered in some wta events) then she would be top 100 by now
|
|
|
Oct 29th, 2006, 12:48 AM
|
#14
|
|
Sabatini lover Forever
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Venezuela
Posts: 14,728
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
Quote:
Originally Posted by nolop
is not ridiculous is just a thought 
|
A biased and ridiculous opinion.
I don´t think a well thought process would have that result.
As I said 2 GS in a year are WAY superior than 1 slam and 3 Tier I events, period.
__________________
Gabriela Sabatini 2006 HOF
18 Grand Slam SF´s, Won 27 titles, 1 GS Sin, 1 GS in Dubs,2 Masters
Sabatini vs Martinez ?
Seasons in the top ten: Sabatini 10 Conchita 9
Straight Seasons in the top ten: Sabatini 10 Conchita 6
Seasons in the top 5: Sabatini 6 Conchita 5
Straight seasons in the top 5: Sabatini 6 Conchita 4
Tier II and above titles
Sabatini 24 Martinez 17
Record at the Masters
Sabatini has 2 titles 2 Runner up and 3 SF
Martinez has 0 titles, 0 RU, and 0 Sf
Record against the best players
Sabatini 40%  Martinez 21%
Head to Head
Sabatini leads 9-6 over Martinez
FWTT Hard 111(111 + ny)Carpet 104(104 + ny)Clay 107(107 + 4) Grass 100(100 ny)
|
|
|
Oct 29th, 2006, 12:52 AM
|
#15
|
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 22,912
|
Re: Players Who Are Not in Their Real Ranking
Quote:
Originally Posted by spencercarlos
A biased and ridiculous opinion.
I don´t think a well thought process would have that result.
As I said 2 GS in a year are WAY superior than a slam and a 3 Tier I events, period.
|
Well I completely disagree with you
I think your head is stuck back sometime before about 1990s, move with the times - dont lie in the meantime.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|