[Setsuna.]

Group A:

1. Azarenka
2. Wozniacki
3. Pavlyuchenkova
4. Errani
5. Paszek

Group B:

1. Kvitova
2. Radwanska
3. Barthel
4. Kerber
5. Cirstea

Vote.

[Jorn]

With YE No. 1 and 2 time YE No. 1 in G A, you can't even compare their success with them in G B

[Setsuna.]

Originally Posted by Jorn

With YE No. 1 and 2 time YE No. 1 in G A, you can't even compare them with G B

Well, obviously Group A has been more successful so far but that might change when everything is said and done. You never know.

[Chrissie-fan]

Very hard to say - almost 50/50 really. But if you put a gun to my head I'd go for group A.

In terms of slam winning ability I think it's virtually even with one player from each group having done it before and likely to do it again. It's impossible to predict who of them will end up with more, but since (so far) Kvitova is a very up and down player while Azarenka is more consistent Vika is more likely to be in the mix at the QF stage or beyond of a slam on more occasions than Petra. Than you have Wozniacki from group A and Radwanska and possibly Kerber from group B who might sneak one in if the draw works out for them and/or if they play the match of their life at exactly the right time.

In terms of the total number of tournaments they will end up winning I think that group A has the edge because of the consistency of Azarenka, Wozniacki and possibly Errani on clay (still remains to be seen if she'll continue to do as well as this year).

Just guessing though because the quality of the two groups is pretty equal.

[soimu]

You balanced well the groups.
Every player has her appropriate chosen pair.

[Setsuna.]

Originally Posted by Chrissie-fan

Very hard to say - almost 50/50 really. But if you put a gun to my head I'd go for group A.

In terms of slam winning ability I think it's virtually even with one player from each group having done it before and likely to do it again. It's impossible to predict who of them will end up with more, but since (so far) Kvitova is a very up and down player while Azarenka is more consistent Vika is more likely to be in the mix at the QF stage or beyond of a slam on more occasions than Petra. Than you have Wozniacki from group A and Radwanska and possibly Kerber from group B who might sneak one in if the draw works out for them and/or if they play the match of their life at exactly the right time.

In terms of the total number of tournaments they will end up winning I think that group A has the edge because of the consistency of Azarenka, Wozniacki and possibly Errani on clay (still remains to be seen if she'll continue to do as well as this year).

Just guessing though because the quality of the two groups is pretty equal.

Great post from you as usual.

[Setsuna.]

Originally Posted by soimu

You balanced well the groups.
Every player has her appropriate chosen pair.

Yup.

Vika/Petra
Caro/Aga
Nastia/Mona
Sara/Angie
Tamira/Sorana

[aselto]

More titles: group A
More majors: group B

[NashaMasha]

Group A++ : Serena, Maria will win more slams these mugs

in 2012 it was 3-1 versus generation "still Suck"

[aselto]

Don't lump Serena and the evil shrieker together

[NashaMasha]

Originally Posted by aselto

Don't lump Serena and the evil shrieker together

[aselto]

What did you say? I can't here you.

[Setsuna.]

Take this Serena/Pova fight somewhere else please. This thread isn't about them.

[doomsday]

Originally Posted by Hisagi.

Take this Serena/Pova fight somewhere else please. This thread isn't about them.

This. Aselto, get a life.

[saint2]

A has already more success than B will ever achieve ...