[Morning Morgan]

It always depended on whether Bepa's mind exploded on court. And half the time it did. Bepa rallies better than Woz, nuff said.

[moby]

Oddly, I prefer Wozniacka's game, because at least she brought something new to the table. Vera just screams poor man's Clijsters. I have an idea of how Peakniacki might play, but the fact that I can't think of how Peak Vera would differ much from Regular Vera says a lot.

I would say Peak LaBorz. She had more potential anyway, even though Vera was not a good match-up.

[Stonerpova]

Zvonareva. She was more passive than I would have liked in a lot of 2011 matches (despite it being her best season), but overall she has more firepower than Woz, more variety, moves just as well, and has a just as good (if not better) serve. Woz was tougher mentally, and it was all about whether Vera could keep it together.

[moby]

Originally Posted by Griffin.

Zvonareva. She was more passive than I would have liked in a lot of 2011 matches (despite it being her best season), but overall she has more firepower than Woz, more variety, moves just as well, and has a just as good (if not better) serve. Woz was tougher mentally, and it was all about whether Vera could keep it together.

In a Peak-vs-Peak situation, I think only one of those is true and I might even put an asterisk on that.
Even usually, I think only two of them are true.

[Stonerpova]

Originally Posted by moby

In a Peak-vs-Peak situation, I think only one of those is true and I might even put an asterisk on that.
Even usually, I think only two of them are true.

I think Vera very clearly hits the ball bigger and has more variety. The other two are more up for debate IMO.

[SilverSlam]

Originally Posted by Fighterpova

It was 6-4 6-3.

Sorry. I was thinking of the final

Even still, she showed that she can beat Caro with her pace when her game is working well.

[pav]

I just want the bugger back playing and healthy, peak or valley

[Pops Maellard]

Without Sergey: Wozniacki 6-4 7-5
With Sergey: Bepa 4-6 7-6 7-6

[Steven.]

what? peak zvonareva is a much better player everywhere except mentally. she can straddle on all surfaces, better footspeed, bigger fh and bh, volleys well

[madmax]

LMAO, Vera is a much more talented player than useless Moonballniacki...she has a nice all-arround game to watch too. There is nothing memorable about Moonballniacki's dull grinding though. Peak Vera blows pusher off the court every single time

[homogenius]

Vera, much more complete game than Woz

[BlueTrees]

Zvonareva 6-1 6-1. Bye.

[homogenius]

Originally Posted by moby

Oddly, I prefer Wozniacka's game, because at least she brought something new to the table. Vera just screams poor man's Clijsters. I have an idea of how Peakniacki might play, but the fact that I can't think of how Peak Vera would differ much from Regular Vera says a lot.

I would say Peak LaBorz. She had more potential anyway, even though Vera was not a good match-up.

Peak Vera had more or less her nerves under control (in comparison to Regular vera)and that changed a lot of things cause she was able to exploit all of her qualities.
Also, I fail to see how Woz's game was particularly new and how she had more potential.Mentally she is miles ahead but game wise she's firmly behind Vera imo.

[SerenaSlam]

Vera. Her ball has more punch to it. Which always knocks Woz out. It's clear. Woz's "peak" is amazing Defense. That defense always has and always will be trumped with minor ease by someone with more punch a bigger game and better weapons. As much of a punch Vera doesn't have against the other players it exist against Woz. CW has no big weapon. Vera in two 63 62

[Harry.]

Caro was never at her peak during their USO match. She had played something like five consecutive weeks of tennis at that point, and was clearly over tennis'd by that point. IMO, the Beijing final they played was both their peaks or close. And Wozniacki won that. Still, I think it'd be a close match.