[Asta]

Originally Posted by cehowardrx7

Also, the only reason this subject comes up is because Graf's fan want to tout her 22 slam count record. If they don't do that, this would never be mentioned.

Thnx for the answer,appreciate it,but as somebody asked before why do you think Graf is always generally voted the greatest if things stand as you say?

What do you think is the reason for that?

[Anabelcroft]

Originally Posted by Asta

Thnx for the answer,appreciate it,but as somebody asked before why do you think Graf is always generally voted the greatest if things stand as you say?

What do you think is the reason for that?

Ohhh,you have just asked a forbidden question

He just doesn't know what to say as every possible answer is for him a defeat!

He is not called ceh-coward-rx7 for nothing

[cehowardrx7]

Originally Posted by Asta

Thnx for the answer,appreciate it,but as somebody asked before why do you think Graf is always generally voted the greatest if things stand as you say?

What do you think is the reason for that?

That person that asked that question and tries to used the online states as solid evidence, is a graf-tard. So, ARE all the people(graf fans) voting in the onine stats.

I am going to ask you a counter question. Why is it that this always comes up when discussing Graf's record, mainly her slam record?

What I say, doesn't count. What history says, counts. It is in history what happened and it will always be mentioned when Graf is mentioned for greatness.

[Asta]

Originally Posted by cehowardrx7

That person that asked that question and tries to used the online states as solid evidence, is a graf-tard. So, all all the people voting in the onine stats.

I am going to ask you a counter question. Why is it that this always comes up when discussing Graf's record, mainly her slam record?

What I say, doesn't count. What history says, counts. It is in history what happened and it will always be mentioned when Graf is mentioned for greatness.

Thank you Ceh

Imo,Graf's Slam record is not the only reason,as Court has more,but the combination of other records as we have had the chance to see them here such as weeks at number 1,that elusive Golden Slam,H2H against other major opponents and other records that obviously outshine others.

I must say that even when you vote online,you can vote for every player suggested as you have a free choice and as we have seen from posted links Graf is always voted on top,either here or on that Australian Open poll posted above.

On the contrary,tennis-magazine did not vote online,as only experts voted,but the result is the same as Graf is the highest placed woman on that list.

Is it a coincidence that experts pick is the same as online voted pick?

[Anabelcroft]

Originally Posted by cehowardrx7

That person that asked that question is a graf-tard.

And you are not a Tard?

Even if I am,is there anything wrong with it?

[Anabelcroft]

Originally Posted by cehowardrx7

That person that asked that question and tries to used the online states as solid evidence, is a graf-tard. So, all all the people voting in the online stats.

I was just asking you why is she voted always the greatest?What is the reason and as fellow member said it's not everything online,as you wish to present just to find a virtual reason why it should not be trusted?

But to no avail...as it seems nobody listens to your blabbing and the voters proved you wrong

[Marc23]

I just don't see how can anyone dispute Graf's greatness with or without loving her as a player

some things are just obvious,proven and nobody can dispute that.

[cehowardrx7]

Originally Posted by Asta

Thank you Ceh :

My pleasure!!

Originally Posted by Asta

Is it a coincidence that experts pick is the same as online voted pick?

That is an easy one to answer and I will ask you a counter question too. On the experts picks, they could be just looking at the tennis-side, and not looking at the criminal-justice side. Yes, there is a criminal-justice side associated with Graf's record, because a criminal act was done for the sole purpose of advancing Graf in a sporting event.

My counter question is this, why do you think this matter comes up EVERYTIME Graf's record is mentioned, questioned, and talk about?

Nothing like this surfaces when other player's records are talked about. Maybe they talk about the competition was weak, strong, and/or not that same, but never do they say "tainted" and/or "artiesk" associated with other player's record.

[cehowardrx7]

Originally Posted by Marc23

I just don't see how can anyone dispute Graf's greatness with or without loving her as a player

some things are just obvious,proven and nobody can dispute that.

Marc, here "greatness" is not in question, her "slam count" is tainted, not her "greatness"..

[cehowardrx7]

Originally Posted by Anabelcroft

I was just asking you why is she voted always the greatest?What is the reason and as fellow member said it's not everything online,as you wish to present just to find a virtual reason why it should not be trusted?

But to no avail...as it seems nobody listens to your blabbing and the voters proved you wrong

Tell you what Anabelcroft, go take your "Great Graf Slam Count Record" to any tennis forum discussion sites, and post it, and see what you get!!

[cehowardrx7]

Originally Posted by Anabelcroft

And you are not a Tard?

Even if I am,is there anything wrong with it?

No, I am a dude.. You wanna pic??

[Anabelcroft]

Originally Posted by cehowardrx7

Tell you what Anabelcroft, go take your "Great Graf Slam Count Record" to any tennis forum discussion sites, and post it, and see what you get!!

I already saw when you posted the same-a moderator deleted your post

That's what others think about it!

[Anabelcroft]

Originally Posted by cehowardrx7

No, I am a dude.. You wanna pic??

Ok,a tard dude

Please don't-I am not interested in grandpas!

[Asta]

Originally Posted by cehowardrx7

My pleasure!!



That is an easy one to answer and I will ask you a counter question too. On the experts picks, they could be just looking at the tennis-side

If you have seen the list you would notice that they didn't.Federer is first on the list and only tennis-wise compared to Graf he has less Grand Slams titles,less weeks at number 1,less year end number 1,has never won Olympic singles gold,not to mention so called Golden Slam,losing H2H against his close rivals and so on.

So,they didn't look just tennis-wise as you say.

[cehowardrx7]

Originally Posted by Anabelcroft

I already saw when you posted the same-a moderator deleted your post

That's what others think about it!

Not only that one, they deleting all my post I start!!

Senior citizen are SUPPOSED to get a little respect!!