[mirzalover]

Im not surprised Taylor won AOTY, Beyonce, and Gaga probably spilt most of the votes. Beyond that though Taylor's album did do more this past year than Gaga or Beyonce...bringing country back mainstream, outselling everyone, writing 7 out of the 13 songs on her album BY HERSELF at 19, with the other 6 being being wrote by her a 1 other person, had great reviews across the board.


What people should be mad about is her beatingthe females she did for Best country Vocal...thats straight up bullshit.

[eck]

Grammys isn't about sales though, so I guess that means Swift won with her ...songwriting.

According to a statement on its official website, the Grammys - unlike other awards, like the American Music Awards - are there to "honour artistic achievement, technical proficiency and overall excellence in the recording industry, without regard to album sales or chart position".

[PlayByPlay]

Originally Posted by Yorker

I feel sorry for the kids, how old is the boy? His voice is fricken as deep as the atlantic

to the comment above.


Lady Gaga never failed in the costume department. I hope she is not too disappointed with Taylor winning album of the year. I never heard of Taylor Swift until Kanye dissed her on stage. I wonder what he has to say now that she has won so many grammys. Like seriously its ridiculous. I thought the chick was one of those Disney channel actress like Hilary Duff.

[LegionArgentina]

There is not women in rock since ages,did anyone notice too?

[Dor Y]

queen B

[Dodoboy.]

the show drew its best ratings since 2004. According to preliminary numbers from CBS, it had 25.8 million viewers, a 35 percent boost from last year that affirms the appeal of pop glitz at a time of plummeting record sales.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/02/ar...02grammys.html



Record Ratings for the Grammys!

Peaked in the half hour a certain someone performed ^^

Ratings from last night:


It was all about The Grammy Awards on dominant CBS last night, with the 52nd annual festivities at a whopping 26.61 million viewers and a 10.0 rating/24 share among adults 18-49 from 8-11 p.m. Comparably, that outdelivered the year-ago telecast (Viewers: 19.05 million; A18-49: 7.4/18 on Feb. 8, 2009) by a considerable 7.56 million viewers and 35 percent in the demo. Take a look at the half-hour breakdown:

The 52nd Annual Grammy Awards (CBS)
8:00 p.m. – Viewers: 25.41 million (#1), A18-49: 9.0/22 (#1)
8:30 p.m. – Viewers: 28.33 million (#1), A18-49: 10.4/24 (#1)
9:00 p.m. – Viewers: 27.31 million (#1), A18-49: 10.1/22 (#1)
9:30 p.m. – Viewers: 28.25 million (#1), A18-49: 10.7/24 (#1)
10:00 p.m. – Viewers: 27.10 million (#1), A18-49: 10.5/25 (#1)
10:30 p.m. – Viewers: 23.26 million (#1), A18-49: 9.3/24 (#1)

[~Cherry*Blossom~]

Pink's performance was amazing!

Bee Why IIWAB??? But 6 Grammys Breaking records

[La Matadora]

Originally Posted by LegionArgentina

There is not women in rock since ages,did anyone notice too?

Karen O

[delicatecutter]

Originally Posted by Belly(.Y.)Dancer

Karen O

[Shvedbarilescu]

Originally Posted by Vaidisova Rules

Taylor won so many that she couldn't carry all of them and ...she broke one

Grammys are worthless irrelevant items. Amusing to see them treated with such appropiate disrespect and carelessness.

[Shvedbarilescu]

Originally Posted by eck

Grammys isn't about sales though, so I guess that means Swift won with her ...songwriting.

According to a statement on its official website, the Grammys - unlike other awards, like the American Music Awards - are there to "honour artistic achievement, technical proficiency and overall excellence in the recording industry, without regard to album sales or chart position".

[Shvedbarilescu]

Originally Posted by LegionArgentina

There is not women in rock since ages,did anyone notice too?

There are 100s of brilliant female rock musicians and this has been the case for more than 30 years now. The fact that they are ignored by the Grammys means f*** all.