Originally Posted by ozza
I tend to think Radwanska's grass prowess is overrated on the basis of reaching last years Wimbledon final.
Originally Posted by heavyhorse
A Radwanska match against Azarenka would certainly be interesting. So would a Radwanska vs Kvitova match on grass.
Such contrasting styles of play usually make for great tennis. Although we all know Azarenka usually delivers a routine beat down for Aga.
Both true. Radwanska (or to a lessor extent Caroline) vs any player who can bash the ball (pure ball bashers a la Georges) tend to be my favorite matchups. A smart, but weaker players vs a dumb player but has all the power in the world. It's no fun to watch two ball bashers or two pushers because both aren't a drag to watch. Either you cringe at every UE or cry when one player fails to put away an easy ball
. Azarenka isn't as exciting because she actually THINKS on court so she makes quick work of Aga, every time.
And although she's a bit overrated on grass (look at the Olympics 2012) hasn't she a junior slam @ Wimbledon? And making the finals isn't a fluke at Wimbledon (well kind of, didn't she beat Kirilenko for a spot in the finals :lol)