TennisForum.com - View Single Post - Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

View Single Post

Old Feb 1st, 2013, 04:53 PM   #30
country flag Jane Lane
Senior Member
 
Jane Lane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NYC, USA
Posts: 16,984
Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute Jane Lane has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgt.Timmykinz View Post
Maybe there should be a system, whereby the linesmen get reviewed on their performance and accuracy after an event is finished and if someone is seen to have made 3 or more errors then they are struck off. Obviously at slams and other events where there is hawkeye this can done immediately, with a linesman dismissed after 2 errors in a match (meaning their call was overturned by hawkeye) and then one more mistake during the tournament and they are struck off/demoted to challenger level.
Linesmen and umpires are evaluated every event; you need to apply to be selected and they look at your work record.
__________________
And the dish ran away with the spoon..
but Hawaii was the only state that would recognize the marriage as legal.
Jane Lane is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote