TennisForum.com - View Single Post - Should The Australian Open Change the Surface Due to Risk of Injuries?

View Single Post

Old Jan 27th, 2013, 07:49 AM   #14
country flag Mattographer
TF's Resident Photographer
 
Mattographer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Cockatoo Island
Posts: 56,537
Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute Mattographer has a reputation beyond repute
Re: Should The Australian Open Change the Surface Due to Risk of Injuries?

Quote:
Originally Posted by JarkaFish View Post
Rebound Ace is faster and lower-bouncing than Plexicuhion.

Obviously RA wouldn't be considered a true fast and low-bouncing surface, but relative to Plexicushion it is; the AO should always be the slow hardcourt tournament but they've gone a bit extreme with this Plexicushion stuff.
Um, no. That's where you're wrong

Rebound Ace is slower than Plexicushion and the bounce is higher.
__________________

Listen to the silence. That's who I am and what I like.
Mattographer is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote