Originally Posted by jameshazza
I've really started to notice something in GM this past while. If you actually structure your argument well you will get very little replies, the trolls aren't fit to attack and they're not going to respond with 'OK. I'll still disagree though just to be an asshole'.
YES! That is a core part of their playbook. They jump all over someone gleefully when they think they've got a winning argument, but as soon as someone does a long and well-structured argument that comprehensively destroys what the trolls are claiming, they mysteriously go quiet all of a sudden
Or suddenly try changing the subject, even if they are the ones who started it. Case in point being the argument in GM when they were claiming Maria's success before the surgery was mediocre.
I know right
I don't get it at all. I've actually tried to.....notice feet when watching porn the last few months since we had this discussion, but I just don't see how they could be a turn on
Erm....apparently our beloved Maria's armpits are fetish fodder. I noticed on Google a few months ago that "maria sharapova armpits" was one of the suggestions in the dropdown, and I was rather scarred by some of the results it gave
Originally Posted by Светльо
I know right. When he told me he was not. I was like but I thought of you as this butch, tough guy who is kind of a homophobe. Practically, madmax but an intelligent version.
Well, in fairness, when I said I was camp, I guess I don't really have a stereotypically gay personality
when it comes to music taste, other cultural tastes etc. (women's tennis obsession aside). It's more my voice and mannerisms that are VERY camp. Anyone I meet in person is always pretty sure I'm gay within half an hour.
*politely ignores the "shadey" comparison to Madmax*