TennisForum.com - View Single Post - PEAK Maria vs PEAK Vika

View Single Post

Old Dec 9th, 2012, 05:59 PM   #78
country flag Exordes
Senior Member
 
Exordes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 6,923
Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute Exordes has a reputation beyond repute
Re: PEAK Maria vs PEAK Vika

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven. View Post
and by that logic, wozniacki's peak > azarenka's peak and venus' peak is the 2nd weakest of all former no. 1s right?

got it.
I didn´t say that weeks at No.1 should be used as the only criteria when we compare players to each other. On the other hand those top 5 players who lead those statistics are: Steffi Graff (377 wks), Martina Navratilova (332 wks), Chris Evert (260 wks), Martina Hingis (209 wks) and Monica Seles (178 wks). Surely it tells something about their careers if head-to-head statistics are not enough? For some players their peak might be same as their highest WTA ranking like No. 20 or winning a big tournament once.

Last edited by Exordes : Dec 9th, 2012 at 07:24 PM.
Exordes is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote