Originally Posted by MakarovaFan
Again other thread were favoritism/results get confused with actual PEAK play.
Anna C's peak level was a mix of Hingis/Radwanska but with bigger ground strokes. It's a real shame the trauma and then injuries hit so soon after her peak, because results/achievments wise she far trails both girls and therefore the more dense TF users will vote against her. Anna was never gonna be a world no.1 or GS winner, but considering the point of THIS thread she was by far the best.
Yeah, alright, but it seems strange to even include Kerber in the list as we have no idea what her peak is, or if it's been achieved. She will likely remain in the top 10 longer than the other two. But who knows at this point. For the most part this has been a thread of "what ifs" vs. "maybe".