Originally Posted by jameshazza
Just got your rep. It is very confusing IMO.
It is confusing because with the peak argument you can prove anything. Player A may beat player B twenty times in a row and have a far more successful career, but if you're a fan of player B you can always argue that ten years ago she had that one match in Indian Wells where she played at a higher level than player A ever did. So what? Player A is still the better player.