Originally Posted by Miloti
^ I'm not sure what you mean really. I dislike Wozniacki, and thats why I don't give her credit at all for her 1# rank
, she's not a worthy 1# player until she wins a slam.
She's been entering the most tournaments from all players and thats why she is 1#
Her style of play leaves a lot to desire, and I know it's not her fault that she is 1# but she has to change her style of play to win a slam, cause in the end she'll end up just like Jankovic or Safina
That is a giant load of crap! Being the #1 Ranked player has nothing to do with winning a Major. That's why I tried to explain to you what the #1 Rank means. I think you need to understand that before you spout off about it anymore and continue making ignorant and foolish statements.
Furthermore, it doesn't matter how many tournaments Woz plays, only her "16 best" tournaments count in her ranking. If she plays 30 tournaments, the results of 14 of them don't count in her ranking.
She is not #1 Ranked because of the number of tournaments she plays. She's #1 Ranked because her 16 best tournaments yield the highest number of points of any other player. Actually, right now she is about 2500 points ahead of #2 Ranked Kim!
Finally, it doesn't matter whether or not you like Woz, her style of play or her eventual career resume. What matters is being informed, truthful and honest about what you post. You haven't been on this subject.
If you want to continue to post this sort of inaccurate, foolish, silly and denigrating propaganda against the current #1 ranked player, I suggest you go the Serenka's forum where you will get lots of support for your studied ignorance about the issue because I will call you out on it every time I notice it here.