TennisForum.com - View Single Post - 2010-11 verbals, high interest & transfers

View Single Post

Old Apr 1st, 2010, 10:02 PM   #267
country flag 2nd_serve
Senior Member
 
2nd_serve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,130
2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all 2nd_serve is a name known to all
Re: 2010-11 recruiting - verbals & high interest

Quote:
Originally Posted by form View Post
So it passed but hasn't passed? That is confusing but then again, it's the NCAA.

I could be wrong, but the way I understand this is: the issue is sent to a committee. The committee voted for the six month rule with an one year delay for tennis. But before the new rule becomes effective, the big boss, i.e. the Board of Directors gets a chance to veto it. If the Board of Directors does nothing about this issue at its next meeting, then the rule is passed. But if the Board of Directors takes it up, and says that they don't agree with what the committee did, then it could still be changed.
2nd_serve is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote