She is a good player, but has a very unattractive personality, both on and off court. This is why I always go against her.
As to the "hotness" - I don't care. This "hotness" factor is for horny immature idiots. If someone goes to tennis games to watch "hot chicks" then the person is disqualified in my eyes immediately.
I'm seriously laughing at people who said she's average looking. :lol:
Do you people know what average looking people look like?
I don't think they look like that ^
I find her more attractive than Sharapova. Just because her face isn't typical (which I find even more appealing) doesn't mean she isn't hot/cute/sexy/attractive. Plus, she does have the makings of a model: height, legs, slender build, face that can take make-up. She just can't speak. :lol:
This is a kind of picture they can make literally with anybody. Put the correct pose and angle, good light and a massive amount of Photoshop, and you pull out this kind of photo even from Schiavone or Stosur.
:lol: I feel like Stosur's features alone aren't bad. Nice eyes, smile is nice, nose is nice, but her face can't take make-up and she has no idea what to do with herself. :shrug:
There's no such thing as face that can't take make up. It's just that she doesn't wear a proper make up for her features, although I'm not sure that the make up she wears could look good on anyone.
This is actually a very nice photo. If you took this then you are a very good photographer!
If Azarenka were as nice as this photo I wouldn't mind her at all!
--
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Tennis Forum
33.4M posts
98.7K members
Since 2001
A forum community dedicated to Tennis players and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about players, gear, matches, scores, guidelines, and more!