TennisForum.com - Reply to Topic
Thread: Should there be a change in schedule for Wimbledon and French Open? Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Jul 5th, 2005 10:37 PM
Mon. I have always thought that Roland Garros and Wimbledon are too close together. There should be at least a week more in between RG and Wimbledon, cause the grass season is just way too short.
Jul 5th, 2005 10:14 PM
Pengwin Have them at the same time

Now we'll see who's laughing Mr. Chirac
Jul 5th, 2005 10:12 PM
monster There shold be at least 1 extra week's break. 1 month would be great.
I don't see that being a drama on the calender- the tournements are already there-
You woudl have
1.French Open
2. s'hergonbosh mens and ladies
3. Birmingham & Halle/Queens
4.Eastbourne & Nottingham
They could also play Newport the same wek as s'hergonsbosh
I think this move is more important than the Oz Open move (which is wonrg-- the season should just ifnish earlier in the year!)
Jul 5th, 2005 05:35 PM
Andy T
Quote:
Originally Posted by DA FOREHAND
Keep it the way it is....Justine lost in the first round because she got outplayed, just as Serena was outplayed in the 3rd.

I say if players are lacking preperation they should modify thier schedules.
In both Serena's and Justine's case, this isn't fair. Serena's prep was severely hindered by her injury and Justine's by the combined effects of the virus and her success in Paris. An extra week may have enabled them to come to Wimbledon in better form. Conversely, Venus had an extra week to prepare because of her early exit from Paris.

In spite of winning, Federer mentioned that he arrived at Wimbledon feeling incredibly tired after Paris and a warm-up at Halle.

It seems that given the drastic surface change and the gruelling nature of clay court tennis, it is in the interests both of tennis as a whole and of all the players to space out these two events by a week.
Jul 5th, 2005 03:03 PM
DA FOREHAND Keep it the way it is....Justine lost in the first round because she got outplayed, just as Serena was outplayed in the 3rd.

I say if players are lacking preperation they should modify thier schedules.
Jul 5th, 2005 01:56 PM
selyoink I also think there should be an extra week inbetween them. Add one more grass court event that could be either a Tier I or II. They are too close together as things currently stand.
Jul 5th, 2005 01:52 PM
Andy T There should definitely be an extra week between RG and Wimbledon with Wimbledon moving a week later. Eastbourne should become a Tier 1 and a new tier 2 or 3 should be introduced between Eastbourne and Wimbledon.
Jul 5th, 2005 12:00 PM
xan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Sanchez
I personally would be a big fan of a longer grass court season. The current one is just over in a flash, yet we're overloaded with clay and hard court events. Surely that's a bit unfair on those players who's best surface is grass?!
It certainly is. The US and AO both used to be grass events. Now grass is confined to four weeks!

I don't thing RG should be allowed to push forward into the grass season. These french must be stopped.
Jul 5th, 2005 11:50 AM
Dirty Sanchez I personally would be a big fan of a longer grass court season. The current one is just over in a flash, yet we're overloaded with clay and hard court events. Surely that's a bit unfair on those players who's best surface is grass?!
Jul 5th, 2005 11:37 AM
TheBoiledEgg
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jakeev
Wimbledon supposedly going to be pushed back a week either in 2006 or 2007.
thats only cos of the Calendar Swing again

Wimbledon 2006 starts Jun 26
thats cos RG starts a week later as well

thats good news cos back to another week of CLAY tennis too and one less week between Wimbledon and US Open
Jul 5th, 2005 09:30 AM
chris whiteside If they keep slowing the Wimbledon courts down it wouldn't make much difference. Baseliners have as much chance there now as serve and volleyers. (Are there any left anyway?!!!!)
Jul 5th, 2005 01:50 AM
ezekiel it hasn't been this way before and someone may corrct me but I seem to remember RG starting in early may. There should definitely be at least 3 weeks between these 2 majors. The change is too great but also spreads the tournaments around.
Jul 5th, 2005 01:31 AM
VS Fan I would NOT change it. It has been this way for years.

This makes it very special when a player wins BOTH in the same year.

I think this has been done by only five or six players.
Jul 5th, 2005 12:58 AM
~Cherry*Blossom~ I think they should have a Tier I on grass and maybe have an extra week or two between the French and Wimbledon
Jul 5th, 2005 12:33 AM
Jakeev Wimbledon supposedly going to be pushed back a week either in 2006 or 2007.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome