- Reply to Topic
Thread: Jelena Ostapenko Reply to Thread
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:


Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Today 04:05 PM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

Originally Posted by tejmeglekvár View Post
I get what you saying, but Sloane is from a much bigger market bringing in more media, viewers and money at the moment. No brainer choice if you are WTA. Also they have a simple justification of Sloane not earning enough points to qualfy since she missed half the season.
Just really hope this scenario won't happen, i would rather have both playing and see Konta, Woz or Halep sitting at the sidelines.

WTa really should have changed rules years ago so that slam champs automatically qualify for YEC.
But the WTA finals are staged at a bad time for the USA, an OK time for Europe, and very good time for Asia. Jelena is wildly popular with fans everywhere, as her matches in Seoul have just proven. There are very few players who can fill a stadium and create a great atmosphere, and right now, she's one of them. Her ultra-aggressive game can go badly wrong, but it's the sort of game that people want to watch, and it certainly makes for drama-filled matches
Today 03:44 PM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

Jelena needs a forum! This is ridiculous.
Today 03:42 PM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

title #2

Wouldn't mind her withdrawing from Wuhan, even tho she has a BYE the draw and schedule is not helping.
Today 11:43 AM
LewisCarroll Does anyone have the speeches after the final???
Today 08:32 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

Today 08:01 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

Today 07:54 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

This was a really good week for her even though the last two matches were quite a struggle. It just gives her some great momentum before Wuhan and the last few weeks of her Asian swing. She has a BYE in Wuhan which is great, but she will need to be striking right from the start if she wants to get past Strycova and make a deep run. Hopefully the wins this week have given her the confidence and match fitness she needs
Today 07:41 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

Aljona won Seoul with Beatziz Haddad Maia 67(5) 61 64.
Yesterday 10:18 PM
Penko Powers
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

looks absolutely adorable. no more sunbathing is good.
Yesterday 08:15 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

WTA Seoul SF

[1] Jelena Ostapenko (LAT) def. [Q] Luksika Kumkhum (THA) 3:6 6:1 6:3
Yesterday 05:53 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

Aljona lost 1. set to 3.
Sep 22nd, 2017 04:58 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

Next step to win tournament:

Aljona defeat Cepede in QF with 3&1.
Sep 21st, 2017 09:00 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

A lot better in the game she served for the match. W 2&2,plays Cepede next who I haven't seen this tournament but she doesn't really have any weapons so it should be another easy win
Sep 21st, 2017 08:48 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

Serve went MIA in the second set,lots of df. Still 4-2* up
Sep 21st, 2017 08:11 AM
Re: Jelena Ostapenko

Originally Posted by itachixx View Post
Jelena's second serve improved a lot in the last 3 months from what I'm seeing in the Hibino game. It has better placement and more speed. Good chance for her to win the tournament
Step by step, Aljona won 1. set.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome