TennisForum.com - Reply to Topic
Thread: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013) Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.



  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Oct 18th, 2017 02:32 PM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)

Oct 12th, 2017 06:44 PM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)



Oct 8th, 2017 11:41 AM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)





Aug 26th, 2017 11:31 PM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)

Aug 23rd, 2017 11:52 AM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)



Safarova, Goerges, Mchale & Begu are always good for a really bad loss
Aug 20th, 2017 09:08 PM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)

Aug 16th, 2017 03:17 PM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)



Example:
Finals: 15
Win Probability: 40% in each match
Should have won: 6


Serena peaking in finals. Not a big surprise
Aug 14th, 2017 11:36 AM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)




Halep got the best spot in the draw. Kontaveit unlucky

Aug 7th, 2017 04:28 PM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)

Jul 19th, 2017 01:50 PM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)



5.00 = ELO 1750
7.80 = ELO 1970
Jul 15th, 2017 12:42 PM
lctorana
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)

Ahh, very interesting.

Here's some appropriate background music.

In the Pliskova #1 thread, we looked at ranking points accumulated #1 as a proportion of the top 100's points, which showed Karo has had the lowest hurdle to jump over to reach #1 in recent years. ELO agrees with this.

But what's particularly interesting is a question I was asked about why Venus was so far down one of my lists. I said there were 4 or more very strong contenders at the time, reducing her win proportion - they were out there winning lots of matches at the same time.

This ELO rating clearly shows that Venus clearly had to leap the highest hurdle to achieve #1 (followed closely by her sister), which make sense. When the William sisters achieved #1, it was a harder-fought achievement than Karo or Empress or Angie, by roughly 10-15%.

(@KleineBiere;, I recommend you also show the highest or average ELO rating whilst #1 in order to put Serena on top, so you avoid getting tarred and feathered by the TF trolls)
Jul 15th, 2017 12:04 PM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)

Update



@lctorana
Jul 1st, 2017 04:12 PM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)

Jun 19th, 2017 11:06 AM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)

May 14th, 2017 08:56 AM
KleineBiere
Re: WTA Elo Ratings - revised (04/11/2013)

This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome