TennisForum.com - Reply to Topic
Thread: Ranking 2012-3 Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Jun 9th, 2013 04:41 AM
tie_breaker
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by slickshoes510 View Post
They had to give something to a non-Pac 12 school.
http://www.gatorzone.com/story.php?id=25855
Jun 9th, 2013 03:41 AM
slickshoes510
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
I think they should have been consistent and done the same thing with the singles winner
They had to give something to a non-Pac 12 school.
Jun 9th, 2013 03:35 AM
tie_breaker
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by slickshoes510 View Post
Someone posted how the points are allocated during the NCAA tournament. The champion is automatically awarded the #1 ranking.
I think they should have been consistent and done the same thing with the singles winner
Jun 9th, 2013 03:20 AM
slickshoes510
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by SakiBomb25 View Post
No, Stanford finished the year No. 1 because it beat the No. 1, 3, 4 and 5 teams in five days. That's a lot of top-heavy competition that would boost any tram's ranking in a hurry.
Someone posted how the points are allocated during the NCAA tournament. The champion is automatically awarded the #1 ranking.
Jun 9th, 2013 02:52 AM
SakiBomb25
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by knoxt View Post
I don't understand how this team ranking works.. Stanford jumped from #12 to #1 coz they won the championships? Lol....
No, Stanford finished the year No. 1 because it beat the No. 1, 3, 4 and 5 teams in five days. That's a lot of top-heavy competition that would boost any tram's ranking in a hurry.
Jun 8th, 2013 10:45 PM
slickshoes510
Re: Ranking 2012-3

UCLA, USC, Stanford, and Georgia are the only schools with 3 players named All-Americans.

http://www.itatennis.com/AboutITA/Ne...n_I_Tennis.htm
Jun 6th, 2013 05:06 AM
knoxt
Re: Ranking 2012-3

I don't understand how this team ranking works.. Stanford jumped from #12 to #1 coz they won the championships? Lol....
Jun 5th, 2013 11:23 PM
Ianto_Jones
Re: Ranking 2012-3

No. 2 Nicole Gibbs def. No 1. Lauren Embree 6-0 6-1.
Jun 5th, 2013 11:10 PM
Embittered
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Final individual rankings:
http://www.itatennis.com/AwardsAndRa...s_-_June_5.htm
http://www.itatennis.com/AwardsAndRa...g_-_June_5.htm
Jun 4th, 2013 09:52 AM
go_distance
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Just know Grace Ysidora one of former Indonesia junior playing for University of Washington.
May 31st, 2013 03:19 AM
slickshoes510
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2nd_serve View Post
Admittedly I don't know about this, and I'm just guessing, but I don't see the bonus points per round being added cumulatively. Applying the math to Florida, makes it look like the bonus points are by round reached, rather than cumulatively. But please, check my math.
Yes, from what I gather, it's the round reached.
May 31st, 2013 02:48 AM
2nd_serve
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by tie_breaker View Post
Let's see...that's 16 points plus another 10 points for beating USC and another 11 points for beating Florida (+37 points)
Admittedly I don't know about this, and I'm just guessing, but I don't see the bonus points per round being added cumulatively. Applying the math to Florida, makes it look like the bonus points are by round reached, rather than cumulatively. But please, check my math.
May 31st, 2013 02:22 AM
tie_breaker
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by CTSEMT View Post
The final rankings do not treat the NCAA tournament results any different from regular season results, except for the following:

Bonus points for NCAA Team Championships
Advance to second Round - 1 point added to overall average
Round of 16 - 2 points
Quarterfinals - 3 points
Semifinals - 4 points
Final - 6 points
Champion - Automatically ranked No. 1
Let's see...that's 16 points plus another 10 points for beating USC and another 11 points for beating Florida (+37 points)
May 30th, 2013 03:28 AM
slickshoes510
Re: Ranking 2012-3

Quote:
Originally Posted by CTSEMT View Post
The final rankings do not treat the NCAA tournament results any different from regular season results, except for the following:

Bonus points for NCAA Team Championships
Advance to second Round - 1 point added to overall average
Round of 16 - 2 points
Quarterfinals - 3 points
Semifinals - 4 points
Final - 6 points
Champion - Automatically ranked No. 1
Thanks for the clarification!
May 30th, 2013 03:02 AM
CTSEMT
Re: Ranking 2012-3

The final rankings do not treat the NCAA tournament results any different from regular season results, except for the following:

Bonus points for NCAA Team Championships
Advance to second Round - 1 point added to overall average
Round of 16 - 2 points
Quarterfinals - 3 points
Semifinals - 4 points
Final - 6 points
Champion - Automatically ranked No. 1
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome