TennisForum.com - Reply to Topic

Thread: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye? Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Feb 1st, 2013 05:27 PM
doujyr
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

anyone remember the mauresmo vs dementieva final here in paris 2009? don't tell me there's no bias!

edit: i did wonder if it's not technically possible to have hawkeye here, as it's odd to have a premier without it. isn't there a stadium in china that just can't have it, for some obscure techie reason? maybe the same here.
Feb 1st, 2013 05:23 PM
Sgt.Timmykinz
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jane Lane View Post
Linesmen and umpires are evaluated every event; you need to apply to be selected and they look at your work record.
Well maybe they should be stricter on their application process, make a few mistakes and a player is kicked out of the tournament...no rematch. The same approach should happen for linesmen, especially as their mistakes can ruin a player's career.
Feb 1st, 2013 04:53 PM
Jane Lane
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sgt.Timmykinz View Post
Maybe there should be a system, whereby the linesmen get reviewed on their performance and accuracy after an event is finished and if someone is seen to have made 3 or more errors then they are struck off. Obviously at slams and other events where there is hawkeye this can done immediately, with a linesman dismissed after 2 errors in a match (meaning their call was overturned by hawkeye) and then one more mistake during the tournament and they are struck off/demoted to challenger level.
Linesmen and umpires are evaluated every event; you need to apply to be selected and they look at your work record.
Feb 1st, 2013 04:01 PM
Sgt.Timmykinz
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Maybe there should be a system, whereby the linesmen get reviewed on their performance and accuracy after an event is finished and if someone is seen to have made 3 or more errors then they are struck off. Obviously at slams and other events where there is hawkeye this can done immediately, with a linesman dismissed after 2 errors in a match (meaning their call was overturned by hawkeye) and then one more mistake during the tournament and they are struck off/demoted to challenger level.
Feb 1st, 2013 12:09 PM
Northstar
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjurra View Post
Well said.

I think many chair umpires forget to overrule in non-hawkeye events because they have gotten a bit lazy.
They dont want to overrule and be proven wrong by the replay so they just sit there and do nothing. Same with all sports which are using video technology, the umpires get worse
Feb 1st, 2013 12:06 PM
Northstar
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chaosm21 View Post
Of course they make mistakes, but in general umpires and linesmen do a good job, so I doubt they are corrupt
Players often have the ball nearly on their feet and are still wrong, so I really don`t understand how the umpires can overrule from their chair which is around 13 meters away. They must have great eyes
The ball was on the other side of the court but still quite near the umpire. They have a better view because all they have to do is sit there while the players are moving
Feb 1st, 2013 11:56 AM
Chaosm21
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Of course they make mistakes, but in general umpires and linesmen do a good job, so I doubt they are corrupt
Players often have the ball nearly on their feet and are still wrong, so I really don`t understand how the umpires can overrule from their chair which is around 13 meters away. They must have great eyes
Feb 1st, 2013 11:27 AM
bjurra
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pla View Post
Calling it corrupt is a bit exaggerating. Home bias always existed, and will exist until the technology evolves to a level it will no longer need a linesman. Humans are biased, even at a subconscious level. I am sure the linesmen don't even realise they are doing it. It is as it is- our senses are not perfect, and the analysis of the data they "send" to our brain- even less.
Well said.

I think many chair umpires forget to overrule in non-hawkeye events because they have gotten a bit lazy.
Feb 1st, 2013 09:41 AM
Mateo Mathieu
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

It's difficult to call if someone has a big serve such as John Isner and Andy Roddick "Uhhh, out?"
Feb 1st, 2013 08:09 AM
Raiden
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Quote:
Originally Posted by LUVMIRZA View Post
Mistakes tend to happen often
No they're not mistakes.

It can't be honest mistakes if they keep benefiting one side, usually the home side, far more than the other (which is what was the case here: the home player getting almost all the crucial benefit-of-the-doubt calls).

It was a typical case of "homer umpiring" which is a disease not only in tennis but in sports in general.
Feb 1st, 2013 07:55 AM
Katja
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Mladenovic got lucky with the line calls two matches in a row, but I'm not sure I would call it corruption. It's really weird that Linz as an International can afford Hawkeye yet the Premier in Paris can't though.
Feb 1st, 2013 06:21 AM
Maria rocks
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick345 View Post
I honestly can´t remember, but you watch events like Paris or Copenhagen that don´t have hawkeye technology and the hometown bias is off the charts. Wickmayer got screwed over by a linesman calling a ball out at her breakpoint for 5-5 atht was clearly in and would have put Wickmayer rin great position. And it wasn´t the first time in the match it happened.
Wickmayer got screwed over on points a number of times, Was shocking really. Not taking anything away from Kristina's fabulous win but something not right about those calls. Makes you realise how good hawkeye is really.
Feb 1st, 2013 06:14 AM
stromatolite
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

In my experience, anybody watching a match actively looking for any kind of hometown bias is going to *find* it. There are bad (or at least contentious) calls in any match, and if you're looking for instances of such calls that favor the home player, these are the ones that will leap out at you, whereas you will tend to overlook the calls that go the other way.

And purely based on chance there will be individual matches in which the contentious calls do overridingly favor the home player. It makes no sense to talk about bias unless there is a systematic difference between home and away players throughout the tournament.
Jan 31st, 2013 07:38 PM
Third Mall
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

It's not corrupt. The officiating in Paris at least has been consistently bad.
Jan 31st, 2013 07:34 PM
Cooper96
Re: Was officiating always this corrupt before hawkeye?

Well yeah obviously, but that's why only all new tournaments should have to have it. I do think it's ridiculous that not all tournaments have it, but I understand why they don't. I'm not saying that all the current ones who can't afford it should be cancelled. That's fair, isn't it?
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome