TennisForum.com - Reply to Topic

Thread: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros Reply to Thread
Title:
Message:
Trackback:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
You may choose an icon for your message from the following list:
 

Register Now



In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name, your email address and other required details in the form below.

User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.

Password:


Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.

Email Address:
OR

Log-in









Image Verification
Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

Registration Image

  Additional Options
Miscellaneous Options

  Topic Review (Newest First)
Dec 10th, 2012 09:48 PM
SUPER
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by jj74 View Post
She even has good h2h against the Williams, yes i know Serena and Venus weren't nowhere they will be after, but Arantxa was far from her peak too.
Yep. She beat Venus in RG2000 before her amazing streak that summer, although I didn`t see that match (and she played baaad in the SF). She also beat Venus and Serena in Sydney98. Not peak sisters, but it means something
Dec 10th, 2012 06:30 PM
The Dawntreader
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olórin View Post
That's the point. Peak Pierce is ultimately ineffective if she can't maintain form for less than two weeks and leaves for the most important match. That's just useless.
Might as well call her 'Novelty Pierce'.
Dec 10th, 2012 06:23 PM
Olórin
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by Juanes View Post
we are talking about peak, don´t we? Peak means the best tennis not the average performance.... hardly you can count as peak the match where Mary lost...
That's the point. Peak Pierce is ultimately ineffective if she can't maintain form for less than two weeks and leaves for the most important match. That's just useless.
Dec 10th, 2012 06:06 PM
jj74
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by Diamondtieva View Post
Pity she didn't win the title. In a way Stosur was the same at the 2010 French. She didn't lose so few games of course, but she overcame Henin-Serena-Jankovic...then lost to Schiavone .
This must be a joke, are you seriously comparing Francesca with Arantxa.
Stosur was the clear favourite in her final, Pierce was not the favourite, Arantxa was consistently one of the best clay court players on the nineties (when top players actually were good at clay). Yes Pierce destroyed all her rivals, including a very sub par Graf, but on clay against an in form Arantxa the probabilities of end losing were very very high.

I know most people dislike Arantxa's game, and a lot of people here have a tendency to belittle her, but she was very consistent and mentally strong. She even has good h2h against the Williams, yes i know Serena and Venus weren't nowhere they will be after, but Arantxa was far from her peak too.
She didn't have the explosive tennis Pierce had, but she was far more consistent, and it's not a surprise she end having a better career
Dec 10th, 2012 05:08 PM
Miss Amor
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

So what you are saying is, Peak Pierce was straight setted by ASV?
Dec 10th, 2012 04:58 PM
Halepsova
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

I never seen ASV played in my life. I don't know how she was such a GOAT (10 SFs with 3 titles) at the French.
Dec 9th, 2012 11:00 AM
Juanes
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveFifteen View Post
Peak Pierce is so overrated. She couldn't even win the tournament against an opponent in the final with no real offensive weapons. Peak Pierce is good, but I'm sick of people acting like it was the most unbeatable tennis of all time.
we are talking about peak, don´t we? Peak means the best tennis not the average performance.... hardly you can count as peak the match where Mary lost...
Dec 9th, 2012 01:10 AM
terjw
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

I remember that. I also remember them interviewing Graf after getting beaten like that. They were trying to get her to comment on howPierce was steamrolling everyone and had just done the same to her and that she was surely a cert for the title. And Graf simply said she was having a dream run and playing really well but the real test was if she can go on to keep playing like that. I don't ever remember Steffi lavishing praise on any player who beat her. But she was right that playing like Pierce had done in the FO up till then that year is one thing. Keeping that level up is another.

And of course it was not to be that she could keep that level up for the whole tournament. Although of course if any player was good at disrupting an opponent and making her opponent look bad it was ASV.
Dec 9th, 2012 12:48 AM
spencercarlos
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
That player who lost the RG final in 1994 had nothing to do with Peak Pierce.
And as for that "opponent with no real offensive weapons": That is the same player who beat Graf and Seles in Slam finals (and has a positive H2H with Serena ).
Its easy to say you are not at your peak when losing but you are when you are winning.

That being said, you can go back and check Australian Open final 1995 and see the bunch of errors Arantxa made that day, while Pierce was on her game.

Funny that only a couple of weeks later "peak Australian Open winner" Pierce lost to Graf 62 62 at the Paris Indoors final.
Dec 9th, 2012 12:45 AM
spencercarlos
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by spiceboy View Post
Unbelievable? It's not like she randomly won those titles. She reached the semifinals 10 times there, played 6 finals. Won half of them. She was clearly at home in Roland Garros.
Arantxa was amazing at Roland Garros, so consistent performer. She could and beat everybody there.
Dec 9th, 2012 12:43 AM
spencercarlos
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by faboozadoo15 View Post
YES. It's unbelievable she has 3 RG titles, same as Monica. And none for Conchita.
Conchita winning Roland Garros, when she never beat Graf or Seles on clay. Good laught
Dec 8th, 2012 11:09 PM
Matt01
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveFifteen View Post
Peak Pierce is so overrated. She couldn't even win the tournament against an opponent in the final with no real offensive weapons. Peak Pierce is good, but I'm sick of people acting like it was the most unbeatable tennis of all time.

That player who lost the RG final in 1994 had nothing to do with Peak Pierce.
And as for that "opponent with no real offensive weapons": That is the same player who beat Graf and Seles in Slam finals (and has a positive H2H with Serena ).
Dec 8th, 2012 09:11 PM
thrust
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by LoveFifteen View Post
Peak Pierce is so overrated. She couldn't even win the tournament against an opponent in the final with no real offensive weapons. Peak Pierce is good, but I'm sick of people acting like it was the most unbeatable tennis of all time.
SO TRUE AND WELL PUT!
Dec 8th, 2012 09:08 PM
thrust
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Quote:
Originally Posted by Morning Morgan View Post
ASV>Nervous Pierce in first French Open final
NONSENSE! ASV was the better clay court player. Only Graf and Seles, at their best, were better.
Dec 8th, 2012 05:49 PM
LoveFifteen
Re: Peak Pierce in 1994 Roland Garros

Peak Pierce is so overrated. She couldn't even win the tournament against an opponent in the final with no real offensive weapons. Peak Pierce is good, but I'm sick of people acting like it was the most unbeatable tennis of all time.
This thread has more than 15 replies. Click here to review the whole thread.

Posting Rules  
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

 
For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome