TennisForum.com - Reply to Topic
 Title:
Message:
Send Trackbacks to (Separate multiple URLs with spaces) :
Post Icons
 You may choose an icon for your message from the following list: No icon

## Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the TennisForum.com forums, you must first register.

User Name:
 Please enter a valid email address for yourself. Email Address:
OR

## Log-in

 User Name Password Remember Me?
Image Verification
 Please enter the six letters or digits that appear in the image opposite.

 Additional Options Miscellaneous Options Automatically parse links in text Automatically retrieve titles from external links

 Topic Review (Newest First)
 Dec 12th, 2012 07:48 AM ma re Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll So that's it, the poll is closed, too bad we couldn't get more people to participate but that's always the problem in the off-season. New point system coming up in Brisbane, Dec. 30th 2012 Dec 6th, 2012 08:09 AM coolfish1103 Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll Yeah I know it came late so you guys don't have to use it I forgot the existence of the 3 odd tournaments, so the problems might be over there. Olympics can just use P5 multiplier since it's 64 draw, so no problem there. Current system of points awarded for Istanbul and Sofia is different, so Code: ```Max 139 points for Istanbul (9*12+10*2+11*1) Max 94 points for Sofia (6*12+7*2+8*1)``` Code: ```Sofia can use PREM multiplier % Flat 188 vs 214 160 vs 184 141 vs 154 122 vs 134``` Istanbul can use GS/PM multiplier but while trying to figure this out, I found that both systems have problems because Indian Wells/Miami may potentially award more points than Istanbul with R96 draws. Proposed System - IW/Miami 215 + 250 = 465 points - Istanbul 139 + 325 = 464 points % System - IW/Miami 215 * 3 = 645 points - Istanbul 139 * 3 = 417 points To fix this? Proposed System - would have to up the bonus points, or - up the points per match (Like 15 per RR, 16 per SF, 17 for F), or - discard IW/Miami R96 % System - up the points earned per match (Like 15 per RR, 16 per SF, 17 for F), or - discard IW/Miami R96 Code: ```If upped the points Istanbul will award MAX 229 points Istanbul with GS/PM multiplier % Flat 687 vs 554 550 vs 454 458 vs 379 366 vs 329 Istanbul with modified multiplier (2.5/2.05/1.75/1.45) % Flat 572 vs 554 469 vs 454 401 vs 379 332 vs 329``` Dec 6th, 2012 07:27 AM ma re Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll Quote: Originally Posted by Håkon View Post You're correct that it would tie 3rd and 4th, but that already happens under the current system. Right. I figured that once I already posted So the idea is not bad at all, but it still came quite late for 2013 and the proposed idea is much more thuroughly prepared. Let's wait and see what Fred has to say about this. Dec 6th, 2012 07:12 AM Chiquitita. Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll Quote: Originally Posted by ma re View Post @ coolfish1103: thanks for your suggestion. Something similar was posted in the discussion threads by SamR03A (Haakon), but his idea centered around limiting the number of players that would get points in each round. The goal, however, was similar to what you have in mind, to reward more generously the number of correct picks, and not as much wins in advanced rounds. We decided, however, to go for something different, although in a similar direction - to make big tournaments more important than they were so far, which will be something interesting to try in the coming season. If I understand correctly, you suggest here to abolish bonus points completely and just multiply tournament points with 1,5 for IS, 2 for Premiers etc.? If that's the case, the idea is interesting, but I see one possible problem with it. See, with tournament points we often get ties, which are resolved through guessing the number of games etc. If your idea would be implemented, these ties in points would also transfer to the ranking list (cause - example - 40x1,5=60 so if several people would have 40 points at the end of an IS, they'd also all have 60 points from that tournament). This would increase the risk of having ties in the rankings at the end of the season as well, when top 8 have to qualify for the YEC. I'm not saying the whole idea is bad, just that you maybe haven't really thought everything through. Of course, whenever you have an idea for which you think that it could improve the game, feel free to post it in one of the discussion threads Well, you could use the TBs to determine the multiplier - so if the table is 1) Frederik 41pts * 1.5 2) coolfish 40pts * 1.3 3) Håkon 40pts * 1.15 4) ma re 40pts * 1.15 the rankings would be 1) Frederik 61.5pts 2) coolfish 52pts 3) Håkon 46pts 4) ma re 46pts You're correct that it would tie 3rd and 4th, but that already happens under the current system. Have to say I like coolfish' suggestion more. In fact, possibly more than my own. Dec 6th, 2012 06:18 AM ma re Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll @ coolfish1103: thanks for your suggestion. Something similar was posted in the discussion threads by SamR03A (Haakon), but his idea centered around limiting the number of players that would get points in each round. The goal, however, was similar to what you have in mind, to reward more generously the number of correct picks, and not as much wins in advanced rounds. We decided, however, to go for something different, although in a similar direction - to make big tournaments more important than they were so far, which will be something interesting to try in the coming season. If I understand correctly, you suggest here to abolish bonus points completely and just multiply tournament points with 1,5 for IS, 2 for Premiers etc.? If that's the case, the idea is interesting, but I see one possible problem with it. See, with tournament points we often get ties, which are resolved through guessing the number of games etc. If your idea would be implemented, these ties in points would also transfer to the ranking list (cause - example - 40x1,5=60 so if several people would have 40 points at the end of an IS, they'd also all have 60 points from that tournament). This would increase the risk of having ties in the rankings at the end of the season as well, when top 8 have to qualify for the YEC. I'm not saying the whole idea is bad, just that you maybe haven't really thought everything through. Of course, whenever you have an idea for which you think that it could improve the game, feel free to post it in one of the discussion threads Dec 6th, 2012 02:52 AM coolfish1103 Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll Kinda late to write this but anyways: Code: ```The maximum points on offer from a 128 Draw: 247 points R64 Draw: 120 points R32 Draw: 57 points``` Rather than award a flat amount of points, why not % bonus based on points earned? This will make performance matter in a tournament. Code: ``` GS/PM P5 PREM INTL WIN x 3 x 2 x 2 x 1.5 RUP x 2.4 x 1.7 x 1.7 x 1.3 3-4 x 2.0 x 1.5 x 1.5 x 1.15 5-8 x 1.6 x 1.3 x 1.3 9-12 x 1.3 x 1.15``` Code: ```Round them if needed. So if you earn 220 points from AO, % Flat WIN = 660 620 RUP = 528 495 3-4 = 440 420 5-8 = 352 340 9-12 = 286 280``` Dec 1st, 2012 08:07 AM ma re Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll Ten (10) days until the closing of the poll! Just sayin' Nov 20th, 2012 08:27 AM Frederik Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll forgot to subscribe after I voted Nov 20th, 2012 06:25 AM ma re Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll Just bumping the thread a little... Nov 12th, 2012 07:39 AM ma re Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll We forgot to mention how "Special events" would look in the new system - regular tournament points would remain the same, while only the bonus points would change to... Istanbul 1st: 325 2nd: 225 3/4: 150 5-8: 100 Sofia 1st: 120 2nd: 90 3/4: 60 5-8: 40 Olympics 1st: 150 2nd: 120 3rd: 90 4th: 70 5-8: 50 9-12: 35 Nov 11th, 2012 07:48 PM MarkNL Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll This is better than the current system so I voted yes Nov 11th, 2012 05:31 PM Chiquitita. Re: Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll I still don't think this is the potentially best system, but it's an improvement. Nov 11th, 2012 05:16 PM ma re Bonus points change for 2013 - a poll Fred and I were discussing bonus points and how we need to change something for 2013. Tournaments of the lowest category (Internationals) are too valuable in terms of bonus points at 120, and we also think that there should be 5 tournament categories, just like in real tennis, as opposed to three we had so far (those five would be grand slams, premier mandatory events, premier 5 events, regular premier events and internationals). We also think that the top 3 categories should award bonus points for top 12 players, while the remaining two should only award top 8. So after several failed attempts we came up with what seems like a good bonus point system, based largely on the actual WTA point system but with consideration to differences between actual tennis and tipping as a game. So you are welcome to tell us if you would like it implemented starting with 2013. Grand Slam: 1st: 400 2nd: 275 3rd/4th: 200 5th-8th: 120 9th-12th: 60 Premier Mandatory: 1st: 250 2nd: 175 3rd/4th: 125 5th-8th: 80 9th-12th: 40 Premier 5: 1st: 225 2nd: 150 3rd/4th: 100 5th-8th: 75 9th-12th: 35 Premier: 1st: 150 2nd: 100 3rd/4th: 75 5th-8th: 50 International: 1st: 100 2nd: 75 3rd/4th: 50 5th-8th: 30 GRAPHIC REPRESENTATION OF PROPOSED BONUS POINTS BY TOURNAMENT CATEGORY:

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules

For the best viewing experience please update your browser to Google Chrome