PDA

View Full Version : Chase Points per tournament


Volcana
Oct 16th, 2003, 12:49 PM
Only the players who average 60 or more Chase points per tournament


03 7 3916.00 SERENA WILLIAMS 559.43
01 16 6015.00 JUSTINE HENIN-HARDENNE 375.94
08 6 2211.00 VENUS WILLIAMS 368.50
02 18 5987.00 KIM CLIJSTERS 332.61
04 16 2990.00 LINDSAY DAVENPORT 186.87
06 14 2439.00 AMELIE MAURESMO 174.21
05 17 2471.00 JENNIFER CAPRIATI 145.35
10 17 1990.00 CHANDA RUBIN 117.06
09 21 2172.00 ANASTASIA MYSKINA 103.43
07 25 2323.00 ELENA DEMENTIEVA 92.92
11 22 1748.00 AI SUGIYAMA 79.45
12 20 1600.00 VERA ZVONAREVA 80.00
13 20 1468.00 NADIA PETROVA 73.40
15 20 1319.00 CONCHITA MARTINEZ 69.95
40 12 777.00 MARIA SHARAPOVA 64.75
14 22 1380.00 PAOLA SUAREZ 62.73
17 21 1275.00 DANIELA HANTUCHOVA 60.71
31 15 907.00 MARY PIERCE 60.47

faboozadoo15
Oct 16th, 2003, 01:12 PM
hi-- u missed monica
she's played 7 tournaments, and she has an average of 85.6 points. in addition, she probably had no business playing in2 of her 7 tournaments... but thats negligible.

jenglisbe
Oct 16th, 2003, 01:24 PM
That's a big misleading, though. For instance, Kim won Luxembourg last year and only 200 points total. That is well below her average here and would this bring it down, but it was a title win.

If someone only plays 7 tournaments and they are all fairly big, then of course their average will be higher. That's not to say Serena wouldn't still have the highest average if she played more - because she probably would - but it's still misleading.

bandabou
Oct 16th, 2003, 01:24 PM
Only the players who average 60 or more Chase points per tournament


03 7 3916.00 SERENA WILLIAMS 559.43
01 16 6015.00 JUSTINE HENIN-HARDENNE 375.94
08 6 2211.00 VENUS WILLIAMS 368.50
02 18 5987.00 KIM CLIJSTERS 332.61
04 16 2990.00 LINDSAY DAVENPORT 186.87
06 14 2439.00 AMELIE MAURESMO 174.21
05 17 2471.00 JENNIFER CAPRIATI 145.35
10 17 1990.00 CHANDA RUBIN 117.06
09 21 2172.00 ANASTASIA MYSKINA 103.43
07 25 2323.00 ELENA DEMENTIEVA 92.92
11 22 1748.00 AI SUGIYAMA 79.45
12 20 1600.00 VERA ZVONAREVA 80.00
13 20 1468.00 NADIA PETROVA 73.40
15 20 1319.00 CONCHITA MARTINEZ 69.95
40 12 777.00 MARIA SHARAPOVA 64.75
14 22 1380.00 PAOLA SUAREZ 62.73
17 21 1275.00 DANIELA HANTUCHOVA 60.71
31 15 907.00 MARY PIERCE 60.47



Whoo, Kim sure takes a beating in those standings! From no.2 all the way to no.4.

jenglisbe
Oct 16th, 2003, 01:31 PM
bandabou - see my other reply

rikvanlooy
Oct 16th, 2003, 01:43 PM
bandabou - see my other reply


You're so right. A win at Rosmalen (Justine, Kim, Mauresmo, Petrova, ...) or Luxemburg only amounts to 200 points.

A win at a TI only brings 400 points to the winner, so it's impossible to have an average of more than 450 points if you play more than 17 tournaments.

Every time Serena plays a tournament her average will drop, so it doesn't say much.

If Justine plays 1 tournament (RG) and she wins it, she will have an average of 1.100 points.

jenglisbe
Oct 16th, 2003, 01:45 PM
Right - and for me, none of it is to take away from Serena (she is clearly the best when playing); it's just to point out that some averages are lower (even whent he player wins) because the players play more.

bandabou
Oct 16th, 2003, 01:50 PM
O.k...agreed.

disposablehero
Oct 16th, 2003, 02:24 PM
Whoo, Kim sure takes a beating in those standings! From no.2 all the way to no.4.

If Kim had played Slams in half her tournaments (like Venus) she would very easily have made #3. Unfortunately, she couldn't fit 9 Slams into her schedule this year.

bandabou
Oct 16th, 2003, 02:34 PM
If Kim had played Slams in half her tournaments (like Venus) she would very easily have made #3. Unfortunately, she couldn't fit 9 Slams into her schedule this year.

Agreed...