PDA

View Full Version : What will this week's mailbag bring?


Brian Stewart
Oct 6th, 2003, 12:59 PM
After his major factual blunder last week (for which SI took the coward's way out and merely removed all mention of it), what will Wertheim do in this week's bag with regards to that mistake?

The choices are:

1. Coward's way out; pretends it never happened.

2. Briefly touches on it, mentioning the mistake and saying he had it confused with Connors/Navratilova. (Which would also be incorrect, as Connors didn't give up the alleys either.)

3. Acknowledges mistake, and says he "may" have underestimated the impact of the event. Perhaps gives some cursory tribute which only scratches the surface of what it really meant.

4. Acknowledges mistake, and gives fairly lengthy commentary that captures most of the significance of the event.

5. Acknowledges mistake, and that he has made numerous other factual errors over the years which has has never owned up to. Apologizes for these factual mistakes, and his frequent double standards (always to the detriment of the women). Atones by impaling himself with a ritual sword.

alexusjonesfan
Oct 6th, 2003, 01:02 PM
After his major factual blunder last week (for which SI took the coward's way out and merely removed all mention of it), what will Wertheim do in this week's bag with regards to that mistake?

The choices are:

1. Coward's way out; pretends it never happened.

2. Briefly touches on it, mentioning the mistake and saying he had it confused with Connors/Navratilova. (Which would also be incorrect, as Connors didn't give up the alleys either.)

3. Acknowledges mistake, and says he "may" have underestimated the impact of the event. Perhaps gives some cursory tribute which only scratches the surface of what it really meant.

4. Acknowledges mistake, and gives fairly lengthy commentary that captures most of the significance of the event.

5. Acknowledges mistake, and that he has made numerous other factual errors over the years which has has never owned up to. Apologizes for these factual mistakes, and his frequent double standards (always to the detriment of the women). Atones by impaling himself with a ritual sword.

What was the error in the last mailbag Brian? I haven't read them in a while and I haven't the faintest of what you're referring to...

though having Jon commit harakiri would be quite the internet trick ;)

Brian Stewart
Oct 6th, 2003, 01:09 PM
It was when he said Bobby Riggs played Billie Jean King under a series of handicaps, claiming Riggs got only one serve, and saying King got to hit into the doubles alleys. This after he said he recently saw it again! :o

Volcana
Oct 6th, 2003, 01:11 PM
It was when he said Bobby Riggs played Billie Jean King under a series of handicaps, claiming Riggs got only one serve, and saying King got to hit into the doubles alleys. This after he said he recently saw it again! :o

Ouch

alexusjonesfan
Oct 6th, 2003, 01:13 PM
It was when he said Bobby Riggs played Billie Jean King under a series of handicaps, claiming Riggs got only one serve, and saying King got to hit into the doubles alleys. This after he said he recently saw it again! :o

journalism at its finest :lol:

disposablehero
Oct 6th, 2003, 04:03 PM
History suggests #1.

griffin
Oct 6th, 2003, 04:12 PM
#5

And the Sox are goin' all the way, too ;)

Joana
Oct 6th, 2003, 07:35 PM
Maybe he has also recently seen the memorable 1992 RG final when Steffi Graf defeated Natasha Zvereva 6-0 6-0. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

CapFan#1
Oct 6th, 2003, 07:39 PM
Wow Does He Really Suck!!!

Spirit
Oct 6th, 2003, 08:05 PM
Well, Brian, you've been foiled again!

He took a vacation.

CapFan#1
Oct 6th, 2003, 08:06 PM
maybe he got fired finally!!! One could only wish!!!

alexusjonesfan
Oct 6th, 2003, 09:27 PM
maybe he got fired finally!!! One could only wish!!!

well...a bad tennis writer in SI is still better than no tennis writer at SI ;)

X-Lurker
Oct 6th, 2003, 09:31 PM
The King-Riggs section has been deleted from last week's mailbag...then he went on vacation.

tennischick
Oct 6th, 2003, 10:13 PM
well...a bad tennis writer in SI is still better than no tennis writer at SI ;)
i completely agree with this. yes Jon made a mistake. a bad one. but any writer who cares enuf about tennis to keep writing about it is someone i hope SI decides to keep. tennis as a sport is suffering enuf as it is to lose one of its greatest supporters. no matter what.