View Full Version : Can someone please answer this?

Feb 12th, 2003, 02:22 AM
Out of the top twenty, who is not worthy of their rank? Who should be ranked higher or lower.

I say:

Jelena is not a top ten player she's more like a top fifteen mainstay. Her ranking is not what she really is but that will be exploited as the year goes on.

Alexandra should be a little higher considering Elena Dementieva has maintained a top twenty ranking while enduring a slump last year.

Monica should be higher than her current rank but considering her points are only for partial year, it's good.

Daniela is more like a number 9 player or anything south of that. She haven't been playing like that number she's sitting next to.

Chanda should be top 10 because she has been steady and she's only stuck there in that spot because of the williams factor (if she didn't run into a williams in the draw she probably would have went further..).

Amelie should be #5 because she is the one that played and improved her skill.

Lindsay should be number 6-more finals last year than the current #6...but Lindsay only played partial year.

Kim and Justine deserves their rank.

The other players are deserving of their rank and maybe higher.

Sam L
Feb 12th, 2003, 02:26 AM
Amelie should definitely be #5, yes. Wimbledon and US Open semi-finalist, Canadian Open champion at her best. Now injured. She'll be back to her best on the claycourts.

Venus Forever
Feb 12th, 2003, 02:28 AM
Venus and Serena - swap places.;)

Kim, Lindsay, Monica - Top 5

Jennifer, Justine, Daniela, Amelie, Chanda - Top 10

Alexandra, Dokic, Myskina, Maleeva, Schnyder, Bovina, Daniilidou, Dementieva, Shaughnessy, Pierce - Top 20

Farina Elia, Pistolesi - top 30

Feb 12th, 2003, 03:46 AM
top 4 should stay as is. Hantuchova should barely be in the top 10. Mauresmo is fine where she is. Capriati should stay there, maybe a little lower. Davenport should be top 6 at least. Seles should be a little higher. Dokic should be top 5. from 10-20, the ones who should be there r Myskina, rubin, Pierce, Bovina, Schnyder, Daniilidou, and some others. Stevenson should be ranked out of the top 50. and Dementieva should be barely clinging onto a top 30 spot.

Venus Forever
Feb 12th, 2003, 03:50 AM
Why should Alexandra be outside the top 50. She definitely has the game for the top 10, even top 5.

Oh, I get it. It's just because you strongly dislike her.

If you deny that Alexandra has talent, then there is something wrong with the picture. You can't beat Capriati three times, Dokic twice, Hantuchova, and Myskina and be considered outside the top 50.