PDA

View Full Version : Who's Better??


Venus Forever
Dec 22nd, 2002, 03:53 PM
...the VENUS of 2000 or the SERENA of 2002??

Hmmm...

I don't know if I can pick.

Venus was injured most of the year in 2000, from January to May. Serena was injured from mid-January to March.

Venus went on a 35 match winning streak. Serena had winning streaks, but not that many in a row.

Uhhh, I'll go with Venus.

Experimentee
Dec 22nd, 2002, 03:59 PM
Serena was better, just by the way she played in 2002 and the fact that she only lost about 6 matches. Venus in 2000 didnt do as well as Serena before Wimbledon too.

nuriboy
Dec 22nd, 2002, 04:05 PM
Venus Forever......this easy. The year Serena had this year will go down as one of the greatest ever. She had two winning streaks of like 21 and 18. 3 gsīs and after May she lost only 2 matches!! Thatīs domination!!

way
Dec 22nd, 2002, 04:18 PM
As results, Serena, you just have to read the numbers.
As "game qualities" Venus.
2000 Venus was on the road to greatness more than 2002 Serena is.

IN MY HUMBLE OPINION, NURIBOY!!!
:wavey:

nuriboy
Dec 22nd, 2002, 04:34 PM
Hahahahaha, Way! You keep up coming, eh?! So the chance of winning 4 GSīs in a row isnīt greatness in the making? PLuzzzzzz!!!

Elleke
Dec 22nd, 2002, 04:35 PM
I think Serena!

WhatTheDeuce
Dec 22nd, 2002, 05:09 PM
Serena 3 slams

venus 2


WINNER Serena

AjdeNate!
Dec 22nd, 2002, 05:14 PM
Serena. No question.

Venus Forever
Dec 22nd, 2002, 05:29 PM
Originally posted by nuriboy
Venus Forever......this easy. The year Serena had this year will go down as one of the greatest ever. She had two winning streaks of like 21 and 18. 3 gsīs and after May she lost only 2 matches!! Thatīs domination!!

Yes, Serena had 3 GS, but she had more time to prepare for that one GS that Venus didn't win. Plus, Venus won the Olympics, which could easily be a slam.

Venus began her season on the red clay, not her best surface, and was rusty, yet still got to the Quarters at the French.

Serena lost two matches after May, Venus lost ONE.

I don't think it is as clear cut as most of you think.

JCAP
Dec 22nd, 2002, 05:52 PM
With this years results no doubt Serena,but any other year Venus!!

Roseie
Dec 22nd, 2002, 06:39 PM
What does it matter? They both are doing great. They are very young, 21 & 22. They have just started to dominate the tour. This is Serena first dominant year. Venus had 2 years when she dominated the tour. Let's see how consistant they will be in the future. Can they be like Graf or Navatolova & really rule the WTA for 5 or more years, let's see. I think Venus knows she has to up her level next year. Just like Serena did this year. Kim, Davenport, Seles, & Capriati, will have something to say about that.

Venus Forever
Dec 22nd, 2002, 08:44 PM
It's just a question.:rolleyes:

nuriboy
Dec 22nd, 2002, 08:51 PM
Roseie I agree with you that Venus has to up her level. When that happen it will be Williams williams and more williams. I donīt think that these two girls have any competition when they are at their best. I think when the sisters are at their best, the tour will start feeling like the players were feeling during Grafīs run.

Warrior
Dec 22nd, 2002, 08:54 PM
Serena

way
Dec 22nd, 2002, 10:14 PM
N:
So the chance of winning 4 GSīs in a row isnīt greatness in the making?

Way:
well, not the sheer chance, actually.
But should she *actually* win 4 in a row, she will without any reasonable doubt enter the road to greatness.
Let's wait and see.
I hope she will.

nuriboy
Dec 22nd, 2002, 10:20 PM
Thank you Way!! Thatīs what Iīm talking about, man!! I hope she can do it too!!

treufreund
Dec 22nd, 2002, 10:23 PM
SERENA SERENA SERENA SERENA SERENA :bounce: