View Full Version : miffedmax closes correct topic

Jun 5th, 2012, 09:19 PM
Hello, Miffedmax closed mine topic about top 15 will be all sf slam no 14 + slamSFless radwanska, he closed it, as a reason he added another topic "is radwanska highest ranked player in history without GS Semifinal", i don't find both threads about same topic because i wrote about FACT that will happen TOMORROW and i wrote about whole wta not ideas about radwanska only.

additionally he closed it because radwanskie.net users who don't like me about fair criticizm about Radwanska send him reports about "how they find it abusing"...

All in the thread was correctly written, only true facts and opinions of me and other users, so i don't understand why we close very nicely done topics and we leave terribly written topics or not giving warnings for user "Cinek" posts x1000 only "Aga <3"...

I always write only true facts and numbers, never fake, and i write long posts not 1 word so i deserve to be respected more than someone who hate's me only because i write painful truth about his beloved player... and moderator shall see that this topic isn't even close to topic he added as "even".

Jun 5th, 2012, 09:41 PM
Most of the posts in the thread are sarcastic or making fun of the OP (which makes me wonder he wants it reopened).

It's a thread about a previously addressed topic, it's lurching towards a flame war, it's about a single player and it is not remotely constructive.

FWIW, I stand by my decision. However, if someone wants to overrule me, so be it.

Jun 5th, 2012, 11:54 PM
or not giving warnings for user "Cinek" posts x1000 only "Aga <3"...

Absolutely. He's advertising his forum by doing that and that's basically spamming.

Jun 6th, 2012, 01:19 AM
the moderating of this board (mostly due to miffedmax) is way overboard these days...

I've been on the board for 5 years and the quality has steadily declined, most good posters have been banned but nothing can be done about the 14 yr olds who just post gifs??

Jun 6th, 2012, 08:10 AM
Please refer to this thread:


Number 8 is especially relevant here.