PDA

View Full Version : Hilary Swank or Charlize Theron? Who had the better oscars winning performance


Barktra
Apr 8th, 2012, 12:33 AM
Who had the better Oscar performance? Hilary Swank in Boys Don't Cry or Charlize Theron in Monster

Both won for their amazing transformations.

if you haven't seen them you should definitely they are 2 of the best performances in Cinmea history

I can't really decide who beat who.

Sammo
Apr 8th, 2012, 12:50 AM
I havent seen Boys Dont Cry but I have seen Monster... It was AWESOME!! So Im voting for Charlize. Hilary is a great actress too so I will have to watch Boys Dont Cry.

Novichok
Apr 8th, 2012, 12:56 AM
Charlize Theron>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

wild.river
Apr 8th, 2012, 12:58 AM
I havent seen Boys Dont Cry but I have seen Monster... It was AWESOME!! So Im voting for Charlize. Hilary is a great actress too so I will have to watch Boys Dont Cry.

don't unless you're ok with feeling like crap afterwards.

Sammo
Apr 8th, 2012, 01:04 AM
don't unless you're ok with feeling like crap afterwards.

I felt like crap after watching Monster too... That poor woman :sad: If she have had a good life and good parents she wouldnt have been an assassin, she could have been a gorgeous actress for example

http://artigoo.com/images/users/wenceslao/gallery/d3d3i8j9h7/ca.jpg


In all seriousness though it was all very sad. If people like these received psychological support in time...

Mattographer
Apr 8th, 2012, 01:10 AM
I've seen both movies and Theron's was 10 times better than Swank's.

Sam L
Apr 8th, 2012, 01:30 AM
Better than both of them:

http://www.boston.com/business/ticker/2011/03/21/natalie.jpg

Novichok
Apr 8th, 2012, 01:32 AM
^ BYE!!! :spit:

CrossCourt~Rally
Apr 8th, 2012, 01:35 AM
I've seen both movies and Theron's was 10 times better than Swank's.

Actually i think Hilary's Oscar winning performance in Million Dollar Baby was better than her BDC performance.

Anyone else agree with me ? :)

VeeJJ
Apr 8th, 2012, 01:38 AM
Swank :lol: everyone else gtfo. Million Dollar Baby was a better performance IMO

delicatecutter
Apr 8th, 2012, 02:48 AM
Better than both of them:

NEVER! That bitch got so lucky I don't even know where to begin.

Mattographer
Apr 8th, 2012, 06:48 AM
Better than both of them:

http://www.boston.com/business/ticker/2011/03/21/natalie.jpg
Seriously? :happy: You're delusional.

skanky~skanketta
Apr 8th, 2012, 08:21 AM
NEVER! That bitch got so lucky I don't even know where to begin.

OMG Thank you! Talk about a massively overrated performance. Kinda like Sandra winning for Blind Side. But I like Sandra so it's ok.

Back to the topic, I preferred Hilary's.

Londoner
Apr 8th, 2012, 08:31 AM
Both are lacklustre and certainly not A listers, but Theron for at least acting in Monster.

Richie's
Apr 8th, 2012, 08:38 AM
The following list shows my point of view.

2011: Natalie Portman – Black Swan
2004: Charlize Theron – Monster
2009: Kate Winslet – The Reader
2003: Nicole Kidman – The Hours
2012: Meryl Streep – The Iron Lady
2008: Marion Cotillard – La Vie en Rose
2006: Reese Witherspoon – Walk the Line
2005: Hilary Swank – Million Dollar Baby
2007: Helen Mirren – The Queen
2002: Halle Berry – Monster's Ball
2010: Sandra Bullock – The Blind Side

To me, Kate's acting in Littile Childern and Revolutionary Road deserved spots on Top 10 of best acting list of decade.
Sandra won with the most "wickest" acting from those above.

Maddy-88
Apr 8th, 2012, 11:28 AM
Charlize :yeah:

Mikey.
Apr 9th, 2012, 01:46 AM
Charlize, she was amazing, but I thought Hilary was really good in BDC as well.