PDA

View Full Version : CHRISTINA AGUILERA IS SOOOO DIRRTY!!!


selesfan1
Oct 1st, 2002, 09:15 PM
HAVE YOU ALL SEEN THIS VIDEO:eek: :eek: AND ITHOUGHT SLAVE 4 YOU WAS BAD .SHE'S HUMPING ON MEN ,WOMEN AND JUST ABOUT ANYTHING IN HER WAY. SHE FIRST COMPLAINED HER SONGS DIDN'T EMPHASIZE HER VOICE I GUESS SHE GOT OVER THAT.

BritneySpearsIsHot
Oct 1st, 2002, 09:21 PM
Christina is Britney's enemy

So Christina is not my favourite at all

Dirty Sanchez
Oct 1st, 2002, 09:23 PM
Christina Aguliera is a has-been (well her records In Britain aren't selling anywhere near as much as they used to, is it the same In America??)

Christina is a bitch, FACT!

Big Fat Pink Elephant
Oct 1st, 2002, 09:24 PM
lol david;)

i ahven't seen the video yet....

I love Britney's I'm a Slave (i ahve two songs or brit i like: Slave and Boys remix(!)).. so maybe i'll like this one too...
the song is ok - i like REdman's version a lot more.

BritneySpearsIsHot
Oct 1st, 2002, 09:26 PM
Christina is a poor mans Britney ;)

Britney is just ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

Sorry Jelena, Britney is one of only 2 ladies to beat you :eek:

Not seen the vid (and don't want too)

Dahveed
Oct 1st, 2002, 09:31 PM
Geez i'm a slave for u is such a great video *COOOUGH* :o

Okay everybody has weaknesses :p


Have you seen Holly Valance's new vid? Not bad either for slutiness :p (not complaining)

King Satan
Oct 1st, 2002, 09:39 PM
WoW, that girl is sooooooo good, I think I love her:hearts:

Luna_Angel_84
Oct 1st, 2002, 10:18 PM
Haven't seen the vid yet. Just out of interestm what's the song itself actually like? Is it available to download anywhere yet?

Oh, and as for the Holly Valance video- :drool: @ at hot brunette girl in it!

kazbeee
Oct 1st, 2002, 10:32 PM
CHRISTINA AGUILERA I don't know what it is but I hate that weird looking girl, she freaks me out every time she is on tv. Why is she so strange and what is with that poodle style hair???????

bluepastures
Oct 1st, 2002, 11:37 PM
Leann Rimes has had quite a stunning change of image for her new video too. Very good song too, although much less of her usual country-music influence to it.

tennisIlove09
Oct 2nd, 2002, 01:29 AM
Christina looks SO trashy. here in Canada, on Much Music, there was an warning about the video!!!

I think she's a beautiful girl, but she doesn't have to be so sluttly about it.

Sam L
Oct 2nd, 2002, 01:33 AM
They're all sluts what do you expect? :rolleyes:

tennisIlove09
Oct 2nd, 2002, 01:34 AM
I don't think they're ALL sluts. I think Avril Lavigne; Vanessa Carlton; Michelle Branch are great examples of good female artists who haven't used their body to sell their music.

Harju.
Oct 2nd, 2002, 02:04 AM
I agree with tennisIlove09 :bounce:
Avril Lavigne, Michelle, and Vanessa are such great talent singers.. They made their own songs!! :bounce: They are just great...

For Christina Slutiera.. is a b!tch all along.. She just wanted to overshine Britney with her sluttiness!! Too bad, CA!! I hate you :fiery:

Candy946
Oct 2nd, 2002, 02:11 AM
She'd still look pretty if it wasn't for the porn star image.

LucasArg
Oct 2nd, 2002, 04:04 AM
The thruth is Cristina is a great singer and her voice is too much good to compare it to Britney.

I personally think both looks overdressed in public, they need to settle down and start showing more of themselves.

I wonder, Who dresses Britney?
and, Who makes up Cristina?

They need to show a more autentic look. N A T U R A L .

PD: Their music SUCKS.:p

tennisIlove09
Oct 2nd, 2002, 04:08 AM
Christina could be a great singer. She has a great voice, but she is too trashy, and the songs aren't good enough to sing.

Jetta
Oct 2nd, 2002, 04:09 AM
Great voice......looks like a slut. :o

RYNJ
Oct 2nd, 2002, 05:02 AM
I miss the days where she sang "Reflection" and "I turn to you"

Mitch01
Oct 2nd, 2002, 05:45 AM
She overdoes things way too much...and is just getting worse and worse. She looks horrible!! Some of the outfits she's worn....like that shredded red thing with the huge hair and then the strip of material she wore at the MTV awards...just make you shake your head....lol She even usually oversings everything, which is too bad because she has a decent voice.

LucasArg
Oct 2nd, 2002, 06:09 AM
And Britney is looking at Shakira and copies her look, even she is singing a rock song, awful...

I prefer Shakira anyway:p

Mitch01
Oct 2nd, 2002, 06:14 AM
Originally posted by LucasArg
And Britney is looking at Shakira and copies her look, even she is singing a rock song, awful...

I prefer Shakira anyway:p

Shakira is gorgeous!!!! :drool: I dont' care what she sounds like, as long as I can look ;)

Crazy Canuck
Oct 2nd, 2002, 06:27 AM
Shakira writes her own music doesn't she?

Frankly I think Christina is far more talented than Britney. However Britney has mastered having a slutty image that people see as acceptable.

Christina is still working on that bit ;)

disposablehero
Oct 2nd, 2002, 06:33 AM
What makes you all so sure that Britney, Shakira, and Christina aren't all the same person?

irma
Oct 2nd, 2002, 06:45 AM
might be possible, just like the whole jackson family is in fact only michael!;)

lrg bllt
Oct 2nd, 2002, 06:51 AM
Originally posted by b3acH 6uy
I agree with tennisIlove09 :bounce:
Avril Lavigne, Michelle, and Vanessa are such great talent singers.. They made their own songs!! :bounce: They are just great...


okay i have to interupt here...dont even put avril in the same group as truly talented artists lik Michelle Branch and Vanessa Carlton.
Avril does shit, she pretends to be someone shes not, shes just a poser, she doesn't write her own music unlike the other girls..and she pretends she can play the guitar but in all fact she can't..she is also proven to be a stuck up snob in a number of interviews she has given with one ending in her telling the reporter to fuck off..so please do not compare her to TALENTED ARTISTS.

irma
Oct 2nd, 2002, 06:56 AM
that avril person tries to copy gwen stefani in her video and then she tries to sing like Alanis Morissette!
I wonder if she singing about herself in complicated! :rolleyes:

Jetta
Oct 2nd, 2002, 06:59 AM
Avril isn't that great, I agree. But somehow, on the US and the UK charts, her music seems to be doing quite well, beating out her competition. And I think the music industry, most of these acts, like avril, like britney, its all about getting the money, getting fame. They don't care if their talent sucks or if they dress like a slut to sing. Just as long as they get the money and fame....

lrg bllt
Oct 2nd, 2002, 08:40 AM
I agree Alexis, its really sad that these people have to change their image just to get noticed, you dont need to but they continue to do it and make themselves look like sluts or posers..

tennisIlove09
Oct 2nd, 2002, 08:44 AM
Originally posted by samantha


okay i have to interupt here...dont even put avril in the same group as truly talented artists lik Michelle Branch and Vanessa Carlton.
Avril does shit, she pretends to be someone shes not, shes just a poser, she doesn't write her own music unlike the other girls..and she pretends she can play the guitar but in all fact she can't..she is also proven to be a stuck up snob in a number of interviews she has given with one ending in her telling the reporter to fuck off..so please do not compare her to TALENTED ARTISTS.

Actually, Arvil DOES write her own music. And you think she isn't talented...that's only your opinion. I happen to think she's great.

;)

Kiwi_Boy
Oct 2nd, 2002, 08:45 AM
oh i think that image is just great for the many little 7-12 year olds who idolise her and watch those video clips:rolleyes:
im sure those kids are dressing sluttier every day!,hmmm i wonder what things may influence this?:o
(omg i think im going prudish!-noooooooo:eek: )

Jetta
Oct 2nd, 2002, 08:52 AM
It is pretty disgusting walking out on the streets sometimes and seeing little 8 year olds wearing mid-drifts and even thongs just like their pop idols. :o

But then again, you have to realize that their parents are letting them watch those pop stars and wearing those clothes.

Beat
Oct 2nd, 2002, 08:56 AM
I have seen the video, and I just could NOT believe it. what is this girl trying to prove? how can it be anybody's aim to look like a complete and utter slut. how can she expect to be taken seriously? she's definitely gone too far and this might backfire badly.

Kiwi_Boy
Oct 2nd, 2002, 09:12 AM
yeah i know(trust me to leave it out),but some parents.....:rolleyes: ,it some times makes you wonder if their training their kids to be prossies or strippers or somthing from a young age,any way its sick when you see "innocent"little kids talking about sex and dressing like well christina:rolleyes: ,surely they can wait,thats what the teenage years are for after all;)

Jetta
Oct 2nd, 2002, 09:17 AM
well kids want to play dress up...... ;)

Kiwi_Boy
Oct 2nd, 2002, 09:18 AM
lol! :)

lrg bllt
Oct 2nd, 2002, 09:19 AM
Originally posted by tennisIlove09


Actually, Arvil DOES write her own music. And you think she isn't talented...that's only your opinion. I happen to think she's great.

;)

actually no she doesn't
look in her album credits and itll say she co wrote certain songs..:rolleyes:

Williams Rulez
Oct 2nd, 2002, 09:55 AM
Christina isn't a pretender like Britney - she can actually sing.

She has a great voice. She is talented. I don't know why she tries so hard to be ugly and slutty, but whatever floats in her boat. I just hope she cleans up her image and just sings.

Crazy Canuck
Oct 2nd, 2002, 10:18 AM
Well being a cowriter of a song, would indicate that you write some of your own music, would it not :p

BritneySpearsIsHot
Oct 2nd, 2002, 10:24 AM
Hey, i'm gonna defnd Britney like i do Jelena, okay she's not a great singer, but boy does she leave me refreshed in other parts :p and her tunes are catchy (If the albums a little dire)

Christina looks like a lip jobbed porn star, but hey some ppl like that ;) but not me

Shakira :p, only 4th on my list of super women but still :p

Williams Rulez
Oct 2nd, 2002, 10:33 AM
I'm not talking about their dress style... ermm, or unstyle, whatever, but their musical talent. I think Britney is a pretender in that category, paling in comparison to Christina, but she is a great performer for sure.

Crazy Canuck
Oct 2nd, 2002, 10:34 AM
Britneys tunes are catchy, because she is given better songs to sing. Not because she WRITES better songs.

Britney also gets done up like a tramp - but as I said before, she has mastered the art of looking like a tramp and people thinking that is okay - christina crosses the line ;)

Britney is a good dancer, and a good performer. I alway have achnolaged that, but either than that her "talents" are average IMO.

BritneySpearsIsHot
Oct 2nd, 2002, 10:38 AM
Britney is sooooooooooooo beautiful, i've always thought of her as a lovely young lady and never thought about her being a tramp :sad: :sad:

I don't care who writes the songs, but yeah she's no Celine Dion (but then compared to Celine, neither are Shakira or Christina)

Just give me a performance (and Britney is the queen there)

Sorry, my Britney is 110% goddess in my eyes :p

Harju.
Oct 2nd, 2002, 10:57 AM
Agree with JelenaDokicIsHot :D :)

Britney is much much more better than CA and Shakira.. but still i prefer Avril :) and Branch :)

Raisin
Oct 2nd, 2002, 11:28 AM
Originally posted by tennisIlove09


Actually, Arvil DOES write her own music. And you think she isn't talented...that's only your opinion. I happen to think she's great.

;)

Although she writes her own stuff, I wouldn't say that she is very good though there are worse artists out there. I just have a problem with this so called tough girl image she is trying to present to the public. She's pushing the "I'm a skater chick" thing too far and tries too hard to be punk. I just think this whole tough girls image in nothing more than a put on, and I'm not buying this schtick of hers. Her management is trying way too hard to position her as the anti-Britney.

Britney, Christina and Avril are packaged and somewhat fake. However if I have to choose between the "slutty jailbaits" and the "skater punk wannabe" package, I'll go with the skater punk. I would rather see the 12 year old girls dressing like Avril than looking skanky like Britney and Christina.

lrg bllt
Oct 2nd, 2002, 11:29 AM
Originally posted by Rebecca
Well being a cowriter of a song, would indicate that you write some of your own music, would it not :p

yes, but what im saying is she is not all that like she poses to be..and she should not be put in the same catagory as Michelle or Vanessa when both girls actually write ALL of their music and play their own music.

Dahveed
Oct 2nd, 2002, 11:37 AM
Stop bashing Britney, she's still a virgin after all :angel: *cough*

lrg bllt
Oct 2nd, 2002, 11:55 AM
Originally posted by Dahveed
Stop bashing Britney, she's still a virgin after all :angel: *cough*

LMFAO! yeah, listen to Dahveed ;)

Crazy Canuck
Oct 3rd, 2002, 10:23 AM
samantha, I agree :)


Britney is sooooooooooooo beautiful, i've always thought of her as a lovely young lady and never thought about her being a tramp

jdih - I didn't say she was a tramp. I have no reason to make such an accusation (furthermore i'm not interested in her sex life anyhow). I said she gets done up like one. And she does :p

BritneySpearsIsHot
Oct 3rd, 2002, 11:20 AM
We'll agree to differ Rebecca :p although i do like it when she is Eau Natural (and i don't mean unshaven legs there)

Dahveed
Oct 3rd, 2002, 12:01 PM
Originally posted by Rebecca
samantha, I agree :)


jdih - I didn't say she was a tramp. I have no reason to make such an accusation (furthermore i'm not interested in her sex life anyhow). I said she gets done up like one. And she does :p

How could you be interested in her non existent sex life becca?

GrandSlammed
Oct 3rd, 2002, 02:24 PM
Ya'll can keep both these skanchy ass, straggley headed, no dancing, half-ass singin', fake ass Teena Maries... LOL.

I saw Chrissy's new video. Is she dancing??

hell no. She jumping and thrashing around, all off rhythmn, lol.
Is she singing??? hell NO.

She's BARKING!! lol


One thing I notice about Christina... she looks.. well.. half-baked, undercooked lol. She does not look normal. Pretty frail, and abnormally small looking. Her mother may not have gone the whole nine with her...

lrg bllt
Oct 3rd, 2002, 02:44 PM
Originally posted by GrandSlammed
Ya'll can keep both these skanchy ass, straggley headed, no dancing, half-ass singin', fake ass Teena Maries... LOL.

I saw Chrissy's new video. Is she dancing??

hell no. She jumping and thrashing around, all off rhythmn, lol.
Is she singing??? hell NO.

She's BARKING!! lol


One thing I notice about Christina... she looks.. well.. half-baked, undercooked lol. She does not look normal. Pretty frail, and abnormally small looking. Her mother may not have gone the whole nine with her...

and whack :eek:

b8beEbLu3
Oct 3rd, 2002, 11:16 PM
Avril is soooo overrated, as well as Britney.

Christina in her early days was good and looked pretty, but now she looks like sh*t

LucasArg
Oct 4th, 2002, 12:14 AM
Britney sucks
April sucks
Mandy sucks

Gwen Stefani is amazing
Pink is amazing
Nelly is amazing


Madonna will always rules my heart :p

Poe
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:03 AM
i think i'll dive head first into a huricane here and disagree with most of you

i'm not posting as some die hard christina fan... i do think she can really sing though... download her live version of "at last"... it's amazing

but as for the sex thing... you know, artists are always expressing sexuality.... it's in movies, books, paintings, photographs, poems, plays... everything... some amazing photographers photograph nothing else except images of sexuality... and i'm not talking porn i mean artistic images

cuz sex is something that is universal that everyone can identify with....

you shouldn't confuse christina with a prostitute or a slut because of what's in her video.... somebody expressing their sexuality is not necessarily asking for sex from the entire audience :p or from anyone for that matter

when there is sex in a movie do you go on about how trashy it is? a graphic display of it is NEVER necessary for ANY plot, but it is in there half the time... and i'll bet most of you enjoy watching them :p

fact is she's expressing something that most of you can identify with and maybe that's what bothers you.... it's a visual display of sexual thoughts, and it's her expression...... it's only trashy if you make it that way.... and whether you really despise her music or not, she IS an artist... if you hate her music it doesn't change that... because somebody else out there likes it...and music and videos are art.... trashy or no.... same goes for madonna's video's and janet's etc.... i mean janet has a song on her last album where you can hear her masturbating and singing about a sexual experience... if that's trashy for you maybe you're just not looking at it from the right angle or you have a very closed mind :D no offense

just an opinion.. so you can flame me now :p

Poe
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:08 AM
and i have no idea why when people don't like singers, or any artists for that matter... they have to trash them so severely

it makes you arrogant if you think your opinion of any art is the truth and should be everyone's opinion and you offend the people that are able to find the beauty in it, just because you can't

i think marilyn manson is .. well i won't even say what i think... but i respect that some people out there manage to find something in his music that they like and identify with so i don't go around bashing him to no end and implying that anyone who likes him has no taste or is stupid or blah blah

Kiwi_Boy
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:13 AM
i dont mind sex in the media at all personally, providing its not being exposed and aimed(any more than can be avoided)onto young kids who idolise these people,and kids are influenced by what they see in their idols,and if they see some one they respect doing totaly inapropriate things(well for their age)they could and do easily assume its ok for them,and this leads on to all kinds of problems.
parents for one have a respopnsibility to sheild their kids from what they deem un-appropriate,but the pop stars too shouldnt try and round up fan ship of younger kids if they know that their image is un-appropriate for them.its a difficult situation.

Poe
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:18 AM
but if christina wants to express her sexuality how can she have any control over whether kids are exposed to it or not? It doesn't mean she intended for them to see it or aimed it at them.... i mean you can't really believe she's that morally corrupt

i think like any artist, she creates her art and sends it out into the world to be heard/seen by whoever finds it and it IS completely the parent's responsibility to shield their children from inappropriate content... if they can't even control what television they watch, how can you expect christina to ensure they don't see it either? unless she just doesn't create it.... and that's not something any artist will accept

you can't hold the artist responsible for who their audience is or becomes.... i doubt very highly she wants only a juvenile audience, most artists create their work for their peers

Kiwi_Boy
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:27 AM
i know,thats how its a difficult situation,but on tv and that you see christina(and others) at the local mall or somthing making hystaria among a sea of kids who worship her,sighning autographs and that,i dont know may be she could say to them that her videos are for grown ups and not kids?,and as for the parents in this age of media its almost impossible to sheild the kids entirely.
its just her old image seemed a bit less"dirty" and thats when she got most of her kid fans,and being kids they probably dont care about her new image in an offputting way,after all shes still christina.

Richie77
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:29 AM
I agree with Poe on one part: It's really the parents' responsibility to control what their children watch. If a singer wants to make a video or sing a song about adult themes (not to be confused with adult movie), then she should be allowed to do so, and not worry about if children will see it, because that's not her job. She can't supervise people's children, but the parents can.

OTOH, I don't understand why Christina felt the need to make that video. She is an incredible singer! She has such a tremendous voice, and could bring down the house singing anything from pop to R&B to Latin music. She could probably sing opera if she wanted to. So why does she feel like she has to make this uber-sexy video to get attention? Christina got three songs to No. 1 in the U.S. not because of how she looks, but because she came in right in the middle of the teen-pop invasion, and had the voice and the talent to distance herself from the rest of the pack.

Poe
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:36 AM
i think it's a misconception that artists express sexuality just for attention or for better sales

you have to be open to the possibility that maybe that's just what she wanted to express? She is a sexual person, she wants to sing about it, she wants to show it.... it may have nothing to do with sales

and for those who don't like that , then the simple conclusion is that her music and videos are not for you... that's the great thing about having so many artists... YOU get to choose what you listen to and watch

that's why i don't understand why people try so hard to change others.. and to make them into what they want, just because what they choose to express is something they don't like

I know for sure that Janet does not employ her sexuality to sell records... i've seen interviews, i've followed her career, and anyone who is perceptive at all can just see clearly that she is a sexual person and she wants to express it

there is not always alternate motives for what people do... sometimes a cigar is just a cigar

Poe
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:38 AM
and i can see by christina's attitude that she is fully aware of her talent :D and why she is where she is..... i'm not convinced she feels she needs to change anything about herself for other's approval or for sales..... she's too egotistical :D

Kiwi_Boy
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:39 AM
i agree,she has a great voice and she should use it in better ways:)-oh well i guess sex sells.

Kiwi_Boy
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:42 AM
oh poe,it is up to christina,but ive not heard anything directly from her so i cant be sure if its her wishes or those of her managers.:)

Poe
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:42 AM
i have to say i would personally be very offended if somebody said one of my poems had a sexual tone just to sell more copies of a book

what that would say to me is that the person can't see the art or beauty of sex, and that it is only something to be bought and sold

Poe
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:44 AM
Originally posted by longwe2
oh poe,it is up to christina,but ive not heard anything directly from her so i cant be sure if its her wishes or those of her managers.:)

but until you heard otherwise isn't it your responsibility to give her the benefit of the doubt? :)

Kiwi_Boy
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:46 AM
i would be too.if it was my veiws as i said i dont know for sure if its her veiws or her managers veiws(who may see it as easy money):)

Richie77
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:50 AM
Well, if she wants to sing about her sexuality because she is a sexual person, then okay. If it's personal to her and has meaning to her, fine.

But I hope that she does come out and say that this is a personal choice for her, if she hasn't already. Otherwise we'll have a whole bunch of female singers who come out and sing about sex just because Christina did...which turns a person's sexuality into a big marketing ploy. And that would not be good.

Crazy Canuck
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:53 AM
Originally posted by Dahveed


How could you be interested in her non existent sex life becca?

I'm errrrr... not interested in her "lack" of a sex life then :p

Kiwi_Boy
Oct 4th, 2002, 04:56 AM
i guess i should i usualy give most people the benifit of the dobt,but some people just make me a bit suspicious,and its not so much christina that im scepticle of as much as the buisness and corprates behind her-i never trust big buissness/people behind people, and as long as shes on a contract and got other people influencing her who directly benifit from her i will be a bit suspicious of motives. :) :) :),its nothing realy personal cause i dont like her or any thing,it just makes me wonder:) :) :)

King Satan
Oct 4th, 2002, 05:12 AM
Man, if Christina wanted too, she could be recognized as a great singer, instead of a trashy looking pop star. She has an absolutely stunning voice, but the material she choose's to sing is just crap.

I figured now that she's established she could write some amazing music, but then she writes this crap.

She reminds me of this great guitarist in the 80s named Yngwie Malmsteen, who had all the talent in the world, and could have written the most beautiful music in the world, but chose to write some crappy ass music that no one wanted to listen to.

But I guess CA still has time