PDA

View Full Version : ATP again


Mike_T
Jun 5th, 2009, 02:16 PM
Again this thread has more ATP than WTA:

http://www.tennisforum.com/showthread.php?p=15812698

Again itís been reported. Again youíve done nothing about it.

~CANUCK~
Jun 5th, 2009, 02:51 PM
Just because you report a post/thread doesn't mean that immediate action or any action will be taken. That thread does not contain more ATP then WTA. That is not a match discussion thread, or a general discussion thread about the ATP tour, its just a silly pic thread, in which we have taken the stance that all interesting pics that can be captioned for tennis reasons are deemed acceptable. Just look at your last post in there, it has nothing to do with tennis at all, does that mean we should delete that also?

http://www.tennisforum.com/showpost.php?p=15812698&postcount=146

Mike_T
Jun 8th, 2009, 11:46 AM
Just because you report a post/thread doesn't mean that immediate action or any action will be taken. Immediate action wasnít taken, thatís why I posted here. I clearly wasnít aware of any rule change for that thread, but I wasnít owed an explanation?


That thread does not contain more ATP then WTA. That is not a match discussion thread, or a general discussion thread about the ATP tour, its just a silly pic thread, in which we have taken the stance that all interesting pics that can be captioned for tennis reasons are deemed acceptable. Just look at your last post in there, it has nothing to do with tennis at all, does that mean we should delete that also?

http://www.tennisforum.com/showpost.php?p=15812698&postcount=146

:weirdo: You only need an IQ in double figues and knowledge of one of the bigger recent womenís tennis topics (http://www.tennisforum.com/showthread.php?t=381281), to realise my post was on-topic. Why should you expect people on a WTA forum, to have the required ATP knowledge, to appreciate ATP captioned posts, when you donít even have the required WTA knowledge, to appreciate WTA captioned posts? Youíve just proven why ATP is detrimental to that thread.

Far from being Ďjust a silly pic threadí, itís one of the most popular threads on here. Iíd suggest any rule changes are brought about with consultation with the majority using it, not by a minority, who donít use it and quite obviously donít appreciate it. The majority donít want ATP in it.

Golovinjured.
Jun 8th, 2009, 12:12 PM
Don't be so uptight, honey. :hug:

Yasmine
Jun 8th, 2009, 12:26 PM
Again this thread has more ATP than WTA:

http://www.tennisforum.com/showthread.php?p=15812698

Again itís been reported. Again youíve done nothing about it.
Well if you read that thread again and you notice it's becoming exclusively ATP, please report it again ;)

Plus let's just remind ourselves it is a thread on a virtual board we're talking about, not a question about life or death :hug:.

~CANUCK~
Jun 8th, 2009, 07:21 PM
Immediate action wasnít taken, thatís why I posted here. I clearly wasnít aware of any rule change for that thread, but I wasnít owed an explanation?




:weirdo: You only need an IQ in double figues and knowledge of one of the bigger recent womenís tennis topics (http://www.tennisforum.com/showthread.php?t=381281), to realise my post was on-topic. Why should you expect people on a WTA forum, to have the required ATP knowledge, to appreciate ATP captioned posts, when you donít even have the required WTA knowledge, to appreciate WTA captioned posts? Youíve just proven why ATP is detrimental to that thread.

Far from being Ďjust a silly pic threadí, itís one of the most popular threads on here. Iíd suggest any rule changes are brought about with consultation with the majority using it, not by a minority, who donít use it and quite obviously donít appreciate it. The majority donít want ATP in it.


I know exactly what your caption was refering to, but since when is a picture of some random baby related to the WTA. Your caption was WTA related but the picture itself sure wasn't, which was my point to begin with. Also if you actually read most of the captions in that thread, most of the posters here find a way to include the ATP pics in a WTA caption. If and when the thread becomes over run by ATP/off topic pics then we will start removing them, but for the time being you seem to be the only person of this so called majority that are against the ATP pics being in there.

:inlove:
Jun 8th, 2009, 08:05 PM
Apply your passion for justice to ending world hunger or something

Mike_T
Jun 11th, 2009, 06:06 PM
I know exactly what your caption was refering to, but since when is a picture of some random baby related to the WTA. Your caption was WTA related but the picture itself sure wasn't, which was my point to begin with.
Yeah right, you’re fooling no one...
Just look at your last post in there, it has nothing to do with tennis at all,
If you’ve dug a hole too big to climb out of, best to stop digging.


Also if you actually read most of the captions in that thread, most of the posters here find a way to include the ATP pics in a WTA caption. If and when the thread becomes over run by ATP/off topic pics then we will start removing them, but for the time being you seem to be the only person of this so called majority that are against the ATP pics being in there.

I’ve linked this thread for peeps to voice their views:
http://www.tennisforum.com/showpost.php?p=15848923&postcount=240


Apply your passion for justice to ending world hunger or something

I was thinking of combining the two. Anyone caught posting ATP will be hung, drawn and quarted, barbecued to medium/rare, then fed to the starving :shrug:

Yasmine
Jun 11th, 2009, 06:22 PM
Enough.