PDA

View Full Version : 132 slams?


supergrunt
May 29th, 2009, 09:32 PM
could anyone ever do this?

Uranium
May 29th, 2009, 09:37 PM
Do what? Play them consecutively? Win them in singles? Have a total Slam count of that including singles, doubles and mixed?

Obviously you probably mean play them and that would take 33 years of consecutive play.

Caipirinha Guy
May 29th, 2009, 09:40 PM
Or win all Singles, doubles and mixed during 11 years.

Uranium
May 29th, 2009, 09:40 PM
Or win all Singles, doubles and mixed during 11 years.

:lol:
Margaret Court has less than half this with 62, so winning 132 slam will never happen.

Craigy
May 29th, 2009, 09:41 PM
Serena? I guess. :weirdo:

supergrunt
May 30th, 2009, 04:40 AM
Win I meant

supergrunt
May 30th, 2009, 04:40 AM
I would think if a super-intelligent super-powerful alien came from some other planet and posed as a human then maybe

Temperenka
May 30th, 2009, 05:00 AM
I'm sorry, this is the dumbest thread ever.

ZeroSOFInfinity
May 30th, 2009, 05:02 AM
132...

Unless you start from age 16, fat chance!

HRHoliviasmith
May 30th, 2009, 05:06 AM
I'm sorry, this is the dumbest thread ever.

:haha:

danieln1
May 30th, 2009, 05:13 AM
Serena will do it... Serena? maybe Isha will become pro and win 101 slams also

young_gunner913
May 30th, 2009, 05:16 AM
Serena will do it... Serena? maybe Isha will become pro and win 101 slams also

Isha only cares about Grand Slam breakfasts at Denny's. Trophies are pointless to her unless they are stacked with eggs, bacon and pancakes.

Mattographer
May 30th, 2009, 05:27 AM
Maybe this will happens in "V" series but not in real life ;)

AnomyBC
May 30th, 2009, 06:01 AM
That's how many slams Serena thinks she would have won if wasn't for all those other talentless players and their "lucky shots" :lol:

tennnisfannn
May 30th, 2009, 06:06 AM
Federer and Nadal can do it if they played on the WTA, not entirely impossible. i.e if only one of them plays.