PDA

View Full Version : Playboy featuring Ashley Harkleroad on sale July 18!


clonesheep
Jul 15th, 2008, 05:12 AM
According to Playboy web site, their August '08 issue with Harkleroad on cover will hit newsstand this Friday, July 18. Would you buy a copy of it?

I have made this a poll.

RenaSlam.
Jul 15th, 2008, 05:45 AM
:drool:

AnywhereButHome
Jul 15th, 2008, 06:55 AM
can-t wait

arbalest
Jul 15th, 2008, 07:07 AM
This poll is missing an important option:

- wait for lewd guy to do HQ scans and download them from peer to peer networks because I am cheap and lewd

itzhak
Jul 15th, 2008, 07:19 AM
http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8025/ashleyharkleroadplayboyxp8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Josh.
Jul 15th, 2008, 07:47 AM
Yeah ok, we get it. Move on.

saniapower
Jul 15th, 2008, 07:51 AM
She is at least contributing something to women's tennis :lol:

Serval
Jul 15th, 2008, 08:29 AM
This poll is missing an important option:

- wait for lewd guy to do HQ scans and download them from peer to peer networks because I am cheap and lewd

Is the correct answer :drool:

jenny161185
Jul 15th, 2008, 10:26 AM
k is this a joke or is she really doing it?

lynxy
Jul 15th, 2008, 10:37 AM
Oh she's doing it, alright... at the same level as her tennis. I wish she would not pose with the tennis gear though, it's a distracting blur with her other role.

ClaudiaZ-S
Jul 15th, 2008, 10:39 AM
Seeing pictures of naked women makes me sick. :(

ATH04
Jul 15th, 2008, 10:45 AM
You wouldn't expect this from a Southerner.

mckyle.
Jul 15th, 2008, 10:49 AM
You wouldn't expect this from a Southerner.

:rolleyes:

It's not like we're all just stuck up in Bibles.

hablo
Jul 15th, 2008, 01:45 PM
I am saving money for the Maria-Camilla special that I dream about everyday

Will this thread be closed ? :rolls: :devil:

bad_angel_109
Jul 15th, 2008, 01:52 PM
I voted for the 2nd last option. Glad I wasn't the only one who voted for that option. Tho I'm intrigued at her photo shoot. Is it really a nude shoot? I don't think so, but it's Playboy so u never know...:rolleyes:

spiritedenergy
Jul 15th, 2008, 01:53 PM
Mamilla:drool:

Corswandt
Jul 15th, 2008, 02:14 PM
http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/8025/ashleyharkleroadplayboyxp8.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

Talk about teasing.

Super Dave
Jul 15th, 2008, 02:34 PM
The option isn't there for "will just find the pics online somewhere". ;)

mal
Jul 15th, 2008, 02:44 PM
She is at least contributing something to women's tennis :lol:

Do you mean, she's gay?
Because I have a strong suspicion that Hugh Hefner is. :lol:
Not that there is anything wrong with that.
Maybe she just did it to get a few bucks.

SOA_MC
Jul 15th, 2008, 03:01 PM
The option isn't there for "will just find the pics online somewhere". ;)

Me too :bounce: but voted for I am interested, will buy a copy if I have spare change.

JackFrost
Jul 15th, 2008, 04:33 PM
I voted for the 2nd last option. Glad I wasn't the only one who voted for that option. Tho I'm intrigued at her photo shoot. Is it really a nude shoot? I don't think so, but it's Playboy so u never know...:rolleyes:
Of course it is an nude shoot. It´s playboy, not a fashion catalogue.
What´s the problem with that. She is old enough. She looks good enough. If it´s ok for her, it should be ok for you. If you don´t like it, don´t look at it. :help:

octatennis
Jul 15th, 2008, 04:51 PM
please post it as soon as you can. :wavey:

Warrior
Jul 15th, 2008, 06:21 PM
http://img210.imagevenue.com/img.php?image=44547_AshleyHarkleroad_Playboy_Augus t_2008_122_155lo.jpg

AndreConrad
Jul 15th, 2008, 07:18 PM
Very nice :drool: ^^
http://img210.imagevenue.com/aAfkjfp01fo1i-12679/loc155/44547_AshleyHarkleroad_Playboy_August_2008_122_155 lo.jpg

LudwigDvorak
Jul 15th, 2008, 07:49 PM
I'd buy if I thought she was remotely attractive. The idea of seeing her naked is kind of :barf:.

Rod the Bama
Jul 15th, 2008, 08:39 PM
I would definitely buy a copy. I personally think that Ashley looks very hot on the cover. :drool: :hearts: Hopefully the rest of the pictures will be pretty good.

AnomyBC
Jul 16th, 2008, 12:30 AM
As I said elsewhere, I'm seriously counting down the seconds until Friday :drool::hearts::woohoo::inlove::banana:

Malva
Jul 16th, 2008, 12:34 AM
I couldn't decide between the following three:

Don't care. The whole thing does not excite or repulse me.

I am saving money for the Maria-Camilla special that I dream about everyday

and

Sorry, I am interested in Ashley only because of her tennis.

Finally, I chose the first one.

The girl is as cheap as the cover photo.

SOA_MC
Jul 16th, 2008, 12:39 AM
I couldn't decide between the following three:

Don't care. The whole thing does not excite or repulse me.

I am saving money for the Maria-Camilla special that I dream about everyday

and

Sorry, I am interested in Ashley only because of her tennis.

Finally, I chose the first one.

The girl is as cheap as the cover photo.

:o:o:o

Malva
Jul 16th, 2008, 12:41 AM
:o:o:o

My most faithful reader.

CrossCourt~Rally
Jul 16th, 2008, 12:52 AM
This will be my 2nd Playboy purchase:angel:. The first issue i bought was with Belinda Carlisle on the cover :lol::lol::help:

Malva
Jul 16th, 2008, 01:01 AM
I'd buy if I thought she was remotely attractive. The idea of seeing her naked is kind of :barf:.

You are not making a secret, Ludwig, who you are attracted to...

I am really curious who are the folks who checked

Seeing pictures of naked women makes me sick.

Mysogynists? Even muslims, well, especially muslims like to see women naked.

bad_angel_109
Jul 16th, 2008, 04:09 AM
Of course it is an nude shoot. It´s playboy, not a fashion catalogue.
What´s the problem with that. She is old enough. She looks good enough. If it´s ok for her, it should be ok for you. If you don´t like it, don´t look at it. :help:I wasn't sure if she'd actually pose nude or not. Maybe a photoshoot (not as revealing) and an interview. You don't need to be rude about it. :rolleyes:

I never said there was a problem. If it's ok for her that's good for her then, all the more power to her. It's not really ok for me because I'm not into women, I don't swing that way. Again I never said I didn't like it, u may have gotten the impression that I did when I didn't. I just said I was curious about the photoshoot and the interview. And I'm not the only person who voted for that option. Again there's no need for the attitude.

3Dcool
Jul 16th, 2008, 09:37 AM
Sure I would wait for that lol.. I can't believe people voted for "seeing naked women makes me sick" xD

JackFrost
Jul 16th, 2008, 05:40 PM
I wasn't sure if she'd actually pose nude or not. Maybe a photoshoot (not as revealing) and an interview. You don't need to be rude about it. :rolleyes:

I never said there was a problem. If it's ok for her that's good for her then, all the more power to her. It's not really ok for me because I'm not into women, I don't swing that way. Again I never said I didn't like it, u may have gotten the impression that I did when I didn't. I just said I was curious about the photoshoot and the interview. And I'm not the only person who voted for that option. Again there's no need for the attitude.
O my lord...stop already crying. It´s a public forum and you have to deal with the fact, that not everybody has the same opinion or that now and then the tone is a little bit harsh.
Sorry, if my post did disturb you that much. I didn´t mean it personally. I meant with my posting all the bigots in this forum, who make a fuss about this pictures.

Sharapowerr
Jul 16th, 2008, 05:43 PM
Sure I would wait for that lol.. I can't believe people voted for "seeing naked women makes me sick" xD

Are you that religious?

clonesheep
Jul 16th, 2008, 11:47 PM
I am a little surprised by the results. There are more people than I expected who are interested in buying a copy. But there are also more people than I expected who would get sick by looking at pix of naked women! Wow.

sarciness
Jul 17th, 2008, 12:01 AM
I am a little surprised by the results. There are more people than I expected who are interested in buying a copy. But there are also more people than I expected who would get sick by looking at pix of naked women! Wow.

And the moral of the story? People don't always vote honestly in polls! (or possibly WTA World (or whatever I'm meant to call it nowdays) is not an accurate cross-section of the general public)

Bring on Ashley! :D

AnomyBC
Jul 17th, 2008, 02:22 AM
I am a little surprised by the results. There are more people than I expected who are interested in buying a copy. But there are also more people than I expected who would get sick by looking at pix of naked women! Wow.

I think that's because the people who are coming here and voting are the ones who have a strong reaction one way or the other. Most of the people who are indifferent probably don't come to this thread and probably don't vote if they do. So basically the people who are voting are the people who either want to see Ashley naked or who want to stone her to death :)

AleOrtu
Jul 18th, 2008, 10:46 PM
The option isn't there for "will just find the pics online somewhere". ;)


100% agreed, in my country foreing magazines are very expensive, and Playboy Argentina features argentinian/uruguayans models.
So, I´ll wait to download the photos once the guy who brough the magazzine scans them :drool: :lick:

goldenslam888
Jul 18th, 2008, 11:16 PM
i think it was a good idea ashley included the towel in her photos. not much there really. looks better with her visor on, too.

i wonder if rainer will prostitude patty out, when she stops winning too?

thank god us tennis fans can watch nadal, federer, djokovic, etc.

saint2
Jul 18th, 2008, 11:54 PM
Sorry, where is the option "I will not buy ir, but im gonna see the pictures here"? :lol::lol:

Nice photosession, really nice...:drool: Few pictures are fucked up, but overall one of better nude photosessions i've seen...

Willam
Jul 19th, 2008, 12:33 AM
who wants to PM the pictures? :angel:

mal
Jul 19th, 2008, 04:40 AM
Are you that religious?

It depends who it is.

Our neighbour, who I detest gave my father a copy of Playboy once, with a picture of someone famous in it.
The suggestion was that he go into the toilet and have a w*nk.
There really is no answer to that mentality, dirty little pig f**kr. :tape:

Sharapower
Jul 19th, 2008, 07:17 AM
I think the link hasn't been posted yet, so there ya go :

http://www.harkleroadzone.com/pb.html

Deliciously naughty!

mal
Jul 19th, 2008, 07:19 AM
I think the link hasn't been posted yet, so there ya go :

http://www.harkleroadzone.com/pb.html

Deliciously naughty!

Is there a law, moral or legal you refuse to break?

Sharapower
Jul 19th, 2008, 07:38 AM
Is there a law, moral or legal you refuse to break?

There might be legal issues indeed, that's Ashley's official site, and I guess the pics are copyrighted, so I don't take the risk to post the images directly.

lynxy
Jul 19th, 2008, 07:59 AM
After all that fuss they are so tame... she is no special model either. If she becomes a cult with teen boys its only because they don't know any better. The only thing really porn about it is the dodgy tattoo down her back.
There, didn't even mention triangles...

AnomyBC
Jul 19th, 2008, 08:29 AM
There might be legal issues indeed, that's Ashley's official site, and I guess the pics are copyrighted, so I don't take the risk to post the images directly.

I'm pretty sure that's not Ashley's official site.... or if it is, she needs a better one :lol:

But yeah, I don't think just posting links to the pics is a big deal, and they already have links to them in the Ashley forum anyway :)

dylan24
Jul 19th, 2008, 09:06 AM
thanks for posting link to pics.
very nice job ashley.

smart move by harkleroad to pose now, and not someone like katarina witt who posed when she was too old.

VasVas
Jul 19th, 2008, 09:44 AM
hot :woohoo:

Reiken
Jul 19th, 2008, 10:45 AM
Very classy and sexy. It didn't look cheap at all and her butt is a 10 YUM YUM :devil:

I'm so liking picture #5 from the link :drool::drool:

Sylvester
Jul 19th, 2008, 11:25 AM
OMG she has absolutely no tits! :haha:


And her pussy is so hairy it looks like a cavewoman! :haha:

mal
Jul 19th, 2008, 11:55 AM
There might be legal issues indeed, that's Ashley's official site, and I guess the pics are copyrighted, so I don't take the risk to post the images directly.

I'm presuming you are a friend of Sharapova, or at least talk to her?

That site is illegal, as far as I'm concerned anyway.
Here's an official one:
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/index.htm :lol:

Actually I don't care where Ashley gets her money, as long as she passes some of it my way. :tape:

Patrick345
Jul 19th, 2008, 01:09 PM
thanks for posting link to pics.
very nice job ashley.

smart move by harkleroad to pose now, and not someone like katarina witt who posed when she was too old.

Witt looked ten times hotter than Ashley. :drool:

Shakira4000
Jul 19th, 2008, 02:20 PM
The set is so cheesy. And they could have given her better outfits. Her body just isn't right for playboy. If every picture would have been like the cover, then maybe the spread would have been better :o

Sharapower
Jul 19th, 2008, 03:25 PM
I'm presuming you are a friend of Sharapova, or at least talk to her?

That site is illegal, as far as I'm concerned anyway.
Here's an official one:
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/
http://www.bankofengland.co.uk/banknotes/index.htm :lol:

Actually I don't care where Ashley gets her money, as long as she passes some of it my way. :tape:

You're the weirdest weirdo I encountered on this forum... but at least you make me laugh :lol:

shotgun
Jul 19th, 2008, 04:03 PM
American Playboy sucks. Where are the full frontals? :rolleyes:

And her pussy is so hairy it looks like a cavewoman! :haha:

Are you serious? If you want to see a real "bush", google for Vera Fischer or Claudia Ohana.

hablo
Jul 19th, 2008, 04:16 PM
I guess she really needed the $$, eh ?

I'm sure she still made less than the "damaged" Kournikova. :rolls:

Barbapapa
Jul 19th, 2008, 04:29 PM
Discusting! Very disapointed by her...

.:sk:.
Jul 19th, 2008, 04:32 PM
Hmm, on the cover pic she looks really sexy but the other pics don't impress me...

BUBI
Jul 19th, 2008, 04:44 PM
She is not hot and these pictures are not good. Playboy used to be quality magazine :sobbing:

hankqq
Jul 19th, 2008, 04:47 PM
After viewing the pics, I only like about half of them. Overall, I think the photographer often didn't choose the right poses for her. Some pics came out really well, but others weren't so flattering.

CrossCourt~Rally
Jul 19th, 2008, 04:53 PM
After viewing the pics, I only like about half of them. Overall, I think the photographer often didn't choose the right poses for her. Some pics came out really well, but others weren't so flattering.

Yeah, i noticed that aswell. The cover is the best picture of them all, by far. I wish they would have chosen a better photog or atleast given her final word on what photos to use. :) I doubt her hubby/ manager negotiated THAT into the contract :p. I still think she is a very pretty girl,but most of the photos don't do her justice. :wavey:

brunof
Jul 19th, 2008, 05:04 PM
I'd eat that pussy out. <img>

hankqq
Jul 19th, 2008, 05:05 PM
Yeah, i noticed that aswell. The cover is the best picture of them all, by far. I wish they would have chosen a better photog or atleast given her final word on what photos to use. :) I doubt her hubby/ manager negotiated THAT into the contract :p. I still think she is a very pretty girl,but most of the photos don't do her justice. :wavey:

agree.

DaMamaJama87
Jul 19th, 2008, 06:07 PM
She used to be such a nice and faithful girl. What happened? Sprawled on a cheap magazine like yesterday's trash? *SMH* She used to have a career and a family at one point. Now she's just another disposable bimbo wannabe. Really quite sad.

saint2
Jul 19th, 2008, 06:16 PM
She is not hot and these pictures are not good. Playboy used to be quality magazine :sobbing:

??? IMO its one of better photosessions in Playboy, definetly....

mal
Jul 19th, 2008, 06:25 PM
She used to be such a nice and faithful girl. What happened? Sprawled on a cheap magazine like yesterday's trash? *SMH* She used to have a career and a family at one point. Now she's just another disposable bimbo wannabe. Really quite sad.

I really think it is unfair of you to pass judgment on her, well we all have our own opinions and it is good to hear them, but the poor girl obviously saw a chance to make a bit of extra cash, and jumped at it.

Unfortunately I don't think it is that simple really. Honestly, I know a woman who told me she worked as a prostitute, no really. She married and decided to give up the "game" unfortunately that isn't in teh rules, and threats were made on her children. Yes the cops are in on it and act as enforcers and use the services of the girls. All this is gospel.
Well one evening a man appeared on the front steps of eh house with a gun and fires a couple of blanks at the smallest girl. The family even has connections to the Deputy Commissioner of police Peter Doone. The two girls from a former marriage were also threatened, and the family is now too afraid to say who e person was who made the threats.
Ashley will probably find herself in a similar situation unfortunately, unable to go to the police because she doesn't know who to trust. Every time someone does this sort of thing, goes on the game, and so on it creates a whole lot of new and unnecessary work for the honest law enforcement officers.
I'm not sure how much money she will make, but she is bound to be targeted, and told, "you have done this before, don't be shy and so on, and her family will be threatened. They don't call it the "oldest profession" for nothing, but her pimp (boyfriend) will be given cash, I'm certain, and she will be expected to have sex with a variety of customers who are part of the system. Sad but true, and she should know that if she plays with fire she may burn herself. :tape:

Sylvester
Jul 19th, 2008, 06:28 PM
Are you serious? If you want to see a real "bush", google for Vera Fischer or Claudia Ohana.

I've seen those and they are scary.

I get the Brazilian playboy once in a while, but current playmates (most of them coming from BBB :tape: ) are waxed! :p

MisterMan
Jul 19th, 2008, 06:36 PM
It's almost sad. Almost. She desparately needs attention, there is NO other reason to do it.
In a mental institution a few years back, a quick marraige and a quicker divorce. She's really looking for something, to find herself somewhere.

Her tennis skills are lacking to say the least, maybe she needs money.

I assume a Reality Show is in the works.

DaMamaJama87
Jul 19th, 2008, 06:36 PM
I really think it is unfair of you to pass judgment on her, well we all have our own opinions and it is good to hear them, but the poor girl obviously saw a chance to make a bit of extra cash, and jumped at it.

Unfortunately I don't think it is that simple really. Honestly, I know a woman who told me she worked as a prostitute, no really. She married and decided to give up the "game" unfortunately that isn't in teh rules, and threats were made on her children. Yes the cops are in on it and act as enforcers and use the services of the girls. All this is gospel.
Well one evening a man appeared on the front steps of eh house with a gun and fires a couple of blanks at the smallest girl. The family even has connections to the Deputy Commissioner of police Peter Doone. The two girls from a former marriage were also threatened, and the family is now too afraid to say who e person was who made the threats.
Ashley will probably find herself in a similar situation unfortunately, unable to go to the police because she doesn't know who to trust. Every time someone does this sort of thing, goes on the game, and so on it creates a whole lot of new and unnecessary work for the honest law enforcement officers.
I'm not sure how much money she will make, but she is bound to be targeted, and told, "you have done this before, don't be shy and so on, and her family will be threatened. They don't call it the "oldest profession" for nothing, but her pimp (boyfriend) will be given cash, I'm certain, and she will be expected to have sex with a variety of customers who are part of the system. Sad but true, and she should know that if she plays with fire she may burn herself. :tape:

Sorry I don't understand your argument. Ashley wasn't in some horrible situation that she was forced to to spread her legs in front of some cheesy photographer to the delight of perverts everywhere. It was her choice and that's what makes it sad because she used to be a pretty good role model for girls and now she's a trashy pinup wannabe.

FrenchY52
Jul 19th, 2008, 06:39 PM
It's almost sad. Almost. She desparately needs attention, there is NO other reason to do it.
In a mental institution a few years back, a quick marraige and a quicker divorce. She's really looking for something, to find herself somewhere.

Her tennis skills are lacking to say the least, maybe she needs money.

I assume a Reality Show is in the works.

Yes, it is. :tape:
I like the cover and that's it, it's not classy at all but nevermind ;) Good for her if it's her way to become famous.

SOA_MC
Jul 19th, 2008, 06:45 PM
She used to be such a nice and faithful girl. What happened? Sprawled on a cheap magazine like yesterday's trash? *SMH* She used to have a career and a family at one point. Now she's just another disposable bimbo wannabe. Really quite sad.

Jeez:unsure: she posed for playboy she didn't murder someone

Martian Jeza
Jul 19th, 2008, 06:52 PM
Won't buy it ! Just saw the pictures on the net : Way too soft ! Always clothes on, net even a full and sexy view of her butt, we see a bit of the hair of her sex but not the sex itselfs, yeah we see time by time her breasts but in general I'm disappointed. Ash', you aren't a daring girl.

DaMamaJama87
Jul 19th, 2008, 07:07 PM
Jeez:unsure: she posed for playboy she didn't murder someone

Sorry, maybe I'm overreacting. But that's probably because I used to be a big fan of hers. What would you do if your sister or daughter decided to pose for a dirty magazine?

shotgun
Jul 19th, 2008, 07:15 PM
I've seen those and they are scary.

I get the Brazilian playboy once in a while, but current playmates (most of them coming from BBB :tape: ) are waxed! :p

I personally don't mind a bit of hair down there (I'm more of an 80s/90s kind of guy :cool:), but too much can be :unsure:, not to mention antihygienic.

Claudia Ohana is more known in Brazil for this than for her actual actressing work.

saint2
Jul 19th, 2008, 07:17 PM
Sorry, maybe I'm overreacting. But that's probably because I used to be a big fan of hers. What would you do if your sister or daughter decided to pose for a dirty magazine?

Ashley is Your sister/ daughter?

Martian Jeza
Jul 19th, 2008, 07:18 PM
I'd eat that pussy out. <img>

You only see a bit of her pussy's hair but you don't see the "pussy" ( I hate this word btw. ) itselfs... :tape:

mal
Jul 19th, 2008, 07:22 PM
Sorry I don't understand your argument. Ashley wasn't in some horrible situation that she was forced to to spread her legs in front of some cheesy photographer to the delight of perverts everywhere. It was her choice and that's what makes it sad because she used to be a pretty good role model for girls and now she's a trashy pinup wannabe.

There is a British comedy, sorry I don't know the name of the guy, and in one episode he won Hugh Hefner's coat (jacket), but he could hardly bear to touch it. It was hilarious.
You probably noticed I don't have much time for Hefner, Larry WhatWshisname from Hustler and of course the "Rat Pack" of "Blue eyes" thingee.
Hefner for instance is really into anal sex with his Playboys, and I can't see any genuine millionaires wanting to be a hooker, so I see it as a necessity, not a life style choice, unless the woman has psychological problems as the result of incest. A decent welfare system is a human right, and people shouldn't be ashamed to use it. Taxpayers should be willing to pay to stop women having to turn to this sort of money making, but the pay must make it attractive for those who don't have much, or have debts and don't see a way to work in any other way. I can't judge because I'm fortunate with family.

Bad morals in the family lead to next generation prostitutes, not freedom from sexual exploitation. I guess my father was one of those rare people who was happy with one wife, and didn't want to look at other women. I blame him for my values, so I see this as definitely an unfortunate retrograde step for her career, not some sort of act of defiance and emancipation, although I'm sure that is what she intended it to be. People see people like me as "prudes" but I'm not, I admire those who gave their lives in the hundreds of thousands fighting for freedoms of all kinds.

SOA_MC
Jul 19th, 2008, 08:18 PM
Sorry, maybe I'm overreacting. But that's probably because I used to be a big fan of hers. What would you do if your sister or daughter decided to pose for a dirty magazine?

It's not really that big of a deal to pose nude for a magazine these days I'm suprised at the reaction from some people here

And Mal come back to the interesting pics thread it's dying without you:awww:

DaMamaJama87
Jul 20th, 2008, 03:53 AM
Ashley is Your sister/ daughter?

What does it matter? She is someone's sister/daughter. That's the point.

lynxy
Jul 20th, 2008, 06:54 AM
I think it's a waste of time contriving arguments about soft porn.

AnomyBC
Jul 20th, 2008, 08:59 AM
After viewing the pics, I only like about half of them. Overall, I think the photographer often didn't choose the right poses for her. Some pics came out really well, but others weren't so flattering.

Which ones do you think aren't flattering? There's one picture where I don't think she looks that great, but in everything else I think she looks AMAZING. The shoot definitely lived up to all my expectations, no question.... I loved it :drool::hearts:

AnomyBC
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:14 AM
Sorry, maybe I'm overreacting. But that's probably because I used to be a big fan of hers. What would you do if your sister or daughter decided to pose for a dirty magazine?

I would advise my sister or my daughter not pose for a dirty magazine, because those sorts of pictures can come back to haunt you latter in life, but if they did it, I certainly wouldn't think any less of them for it. I think the idea of posing nude being somehow morally wrong is mind-bogglingly ridiculous. I think people who believe things like that should move to the Middle East, where they'll probably be a lot happier. The human body is a beautiful thing (well some of them anyway) and I don't think it's something that should just be covered up. If you have a good looking body I think that's something that should be shown off and celebrated as much as possible. Otherwise, what's the point of having it?

Petkorazzi
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:20 AM
I've lost all the respect I had towards Ashley.

AnomyBC
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:28 AM
I've lost all the respect I had towards Ashley.

Don't you think that seems like a little bit of an overreaction?

Petkorazzi
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:33 AM
No.

03 RuleTheCourt
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:56 AM
Won't buy it ! Just saw the pictures on the net : Way too soft ! Always clothes on, net even a full and sexy view of her butt, we see a bit of the hair of her sex but not the sex itselfs, yeah we see time by time her breasts but in general I'm disappointed. Ash', you aren't a daring girl.

... somebody in here is used to Hardcore porn i see :lol:

Anyway, i found them quite shallow and thus disappointing, rather big booty which doesn't reflect the amount of "package" in the upper department. ;)
Next time i hope they offer a photoshoot to somebody like Tatiana Golovin, now she has a great body, but i'd swap the positions
in which the pics were taken though. They're just not tempting enough Ashley will probably stay a one shot pony, i've seen better.
Only thing i really liked was her hairdo, i admit that was sexy.

goldenslam888
Jul 20th, 2008, 01:17 PM
http://www.89.gen.tr/ashley-harkleroad-nude-playboy-pictures.html

here, save yourself the money.

nice tatto. lol.

AndreConrad
Jul 20th, 2008, 01:30 PM
http://www.89.gen.tr/ashley-harkleroad-nude-playboy-pictures.html

here, save yourself the money.

nice tatto. lol.

Some of the pictures are nice and some of them so so. Perhaps the cover is the lowest quality. I don't think I like her tatoos. She is a pretty, small boobied girl :).

scottsue
Jul 20th, 2008, 01:31 PM
thanks for posting that goldenslam888.

DaMamaJama87
Jul 20th, 2008, 03:49 PM
I would advise my sister or my daughter not pose for a dirty magazine, because those sorts of pictures can come back to haunt you latter in life, but if they did it, I certainly wouldn't think any less of them for it. I think the idea of posing nude being somehow morally wrong is mind-bogglingly ridiculous. I think people who believe things like that should move to the Middle East, where they'll probably be a lot happier. The human body is a beautiful thing (well some of them anyway) and I don't think it's something that should just be covered up. If you have a good looking body I think that's something that should be shown off and celebrated as much as possible. Otherwise, what's the point of having it?

Sorry, there is a big difference between artistic nudes which are meant to show the beauty of the human body and trashy smut like this which is intended as masturbation material for pervs. This ain't celebrating her body, it's exploiting it. :tape:

AndreConrad
Jul 20th, 2008, 04:06 PM
Sorry, there is a big difference between artistic nudes which are meant to show the beauty of the human body and trashy smut like this which is intended as masturbation material for pervs. This ain't celebrating her body, it's exploiting it. :tape:

If masturbation is a perversion what else is?

JackFrost
Jul 20th, 2008, 04:09 PM
Sorry, there is a big difference between artistic nudes which are meant to show the beauty of the human body and trashy smut like this which is intended as masturbation material for pervs. This ain't celebrating her body, it's exploiting it. :tape:
Do you think people don´t masturbate on "artistic" nudity? Get real.
And whats a "perv" for you? Somebody who is attracted to nude female bodies? :help:
Perverse are for me pedophiles or Animal-Lover...not somebody who buys a Playboy Magazine.

goldenslam888
Jul 20th, 2008, 04:14 PM
is that tattoo on her back a bulleye?

JackFrost
Jul 20th, 2008, 04:16 PM
is that tattoo on her back a bulleye?
:lol:

shotgun
Jul 20th, 2008, 05:22 PM
I don't think I like her tatoos.

That will look very thrashy when she's older.

Zébulon
Jul 20th, 2008, 05:27 PM
Sorry, there is a big difference between artistic nudes which are meant to show the beauty of the human body and trashy smut like this which is intended as masturbation material for pervs wankers. This ain't celebrating her body, it's exploiting it. :tape:

:worship:
I know it sounds moralizing to condemn such pics, but I'm sick of reading that's it's girl power, cute, artistic or that it doesn't matter. It's just so dissapointing that a woman finds it cool to pose for wankers. :rolleyes:

DaMamaJama87
Jul 20th, 2008, 06:00 PM
Do you think people don´t masturbate on "artistic" nudity? Get real.
And whats a "perv" for you? Somebody who is attracted to nude female bodies? :help:
Perverse are for me pedophiles or Animal-Lover...not somebody who buys a Playboy Magazine.

If you can't tell the difference between art and porn then I'm not sure why I'm bothering to have this discussion.

Look I know most of the posters in this thread are horny teenage boys who've got only one thing on their mind. But don't try to defend playboy smut as artistic. :lol: You're waaay out of your depth here. I bet all of you arbiters of high art aren't even old enough to buy a playboy. :rolls:

AndreConrad
Jul 20th, 2008, 06:05 PM
If you can't tell the difference between art and porn then I'm not sure why I'm bothering to have this discussion.

Look I know most of the posters in this thread are horny teenage boys who've got only one thing on their mind. But don't try to defend playboy smut as artistic. :lol: You're waaay out of your depth here.

I don't think he claimed Playboy artistic... you just called whole class of people perverts so I and JackFrost and I am sure a few others would like to hear your definition of a pervert.

Zébulon
Jul 20th, 2008, 06:16 PM
The main thing was saying those pics are for people to wank on, not about condemning masturbation in itself. :rolleyes:

AndreConrad
Jul 20th, 2008, 06:35 PM
The main thing was saying those pics are for people to wank on, not about condemning masturbation in itself. :rolleyes:

I really did not direct the question to you but I as well could off. Are you saying that in your statement "It's just so dissapointing that a woman finds it cool to pose for wankers." you did not mean a wanker as a deragatory term? I don't mean to be hostile and I can appreciate that someone doesn't like Ashley's pictures, Hey I don't like them much, but don't see anything wrong with what she is doing. Some of you sound like from the times of inquisition. :shrug:

Zébulon
Jul 20th, 2008, 06:50 PM
Well, I don't condemn masturbation, but of course, wanker is a derogatory term. :rolleyes: There's no condradiction. And posing for such picture I don't condemn either, but I rather despise. It's not all black or all white, right ?
I don't like these pics beacuse many aren't nice AND because she's wrong to do them.
What's the point of doing this ? How good is it for tennis ? How good is it for her ? How good is it for women ?
Honestly, apart from the fact she made money how of it, I see nothing good in this business. Saying this sounds like Inquisition ? So basically, we should all applause and rejoice because she's "proud of her body" ?
Come on, I can't stand biggots and misogynists (not sure about the word), but I can't stand to read these pics are cool or nothing wrong. :shrug:

lolas
Jul 20th, 2008, 06:59 PM
I can't believe that nowadays people still buy the Playboy to get masturbation material. I mean there is the internet.

AndreConrad
Jul 20th, 2008, 07:07 PM
(...)
Come on, I can't stand biggots and misogynists (not sure about the word), but I can't stand to read these pics are cool or nothing wrong. :shrug:

If it is wrong for Ashley to pose for those pictures, is it wrong for everyone else to do so? Well if it is wrong for her it has to be wrong for all other models. If that is true publishing Playboy has to be wrong. Is this where your thinking is going?... Again I am not trying to be hostile, if I was I would make a sarkastic statement about burning Playboy. Instead just let me tell you that is is more than okay for Ashley or anyone else to express herself as she pleases. If her motivations are shallow or deeper than anyone else knows it is her business. She is not hurting anyone with what she is doing, not herself, not other women not tennis. If you guys don't like it then don't look at the pictures and don't read about it.

DaMamaJama87
Jul 20th, 2008, 07:21 PM
If it is wrong for Ashley to pose for those pictures, is it wrong for everyone else to do so? Well if it is wrong for her it has to be wrong for all other models. If that is true publishing Playboy has to be wrong. Is this where your thinking is going?... Again I am not trying to be hostile, if I was I would make a sarkastic statement about burning Playboy. Instead just let me tell you that is is more than okay for Ashley or anyone else to express herself as she pleases. If her motivations are shallow or deeper than anyone else knows it is her business. She is not hurting anyone with what she is doing, not herself, not other women not tennis. If you guys don't like it then don't look at the pictures and don't read about it.

I'll simplify it for you. Posing for porn is degrading and it's sad that a girl with once a promising a life and future as Ashley has gone down this path. It's that simple. Now go back to wanking furiously :tape:

AndreConrad
Jul 20th, 2008, 07:28 PM
(...)Now go back to wanking furiously :tape:

Your rude statement is much more degrading than any porn will ever be. People like you will never understand freedom of expression unless you start using your brain cells if you have any left.

DaMamaJama87
Jul 20th, 2008, 07:32 PM
Your rude statement is much more degrading than any porn will ever be. People like you will never understand freedom of expression unless you start using your brain cells if you have any left.


And people like you use highfalutin' languange like "freedom of expression" to try and fool people into believing that the head you're thinking with is the one above your shoulders. :tape:

ChriS.
Jul 20th, 2008, 07:37 PM
I really think it is unfair of you to pass judgment on her, well we all have our own opinions and it is good to hear them, but the poor girl obviously saw a chance to make a bit of extra cash, and jumped at it.

Unfortunately I don't think it is that simple really. Honestly, I know a woman who told me she worked as a prostitute, no really. She married and decided to give up the "game" unfortunately that isn't in teh rules, and threats were made on her children. Yes the cops are in on it and act as enforcers and use the services of the girls. All this is gospel.
Well one evening a man appeared on the front steps of eh house with a gun and fires a couple of blanks at the smallest girl. The family even has connections to the Deputy Commissioner of police Peter Doone. The two girls from a former marriage were also threatened, and the family is now too afraid to say who e person was who made the threats.
Ashley will probably find herself in a similar situation unfortunately, unable to go to the police because she doesn't know who to trust. Every time someone does this sort of thing, goes on the game, and so on it creates a whole lot of new and unnecessary work for the honest law enforcement officers.
I'm not sure how much money she will make, but she is bound to be targeted, and told, "you have done this before, don't be shy and so on, and her family will be threatened. They don't call it the "oldest profession" for nothing, but her pimp (boyfriend) will be given cash, I'm certain, and she will be expected to have sex with a variety of customers who are part of the system. Sad but true, and she should know that if she plays with fire she may burn herself. :tape:Having a fertile imagination is great when it comes to cartoons but not much good when trying to be serious! She posed nude. No big deal. Probably not wise for her career though.

Malva
Jul 20th, 2008, 07:40 PM
Posing for Playboy, Hustler, etc, may have something to do with freedom (of personal choice), but nothing with 'self-expression', nor 'beauty'. And Ashley Harkleroad exercised that freedom, and she did it neither to express herself, nor the 'beauty of the female athlete's body'. A prostitute doesn't do what she does because she is driven by desire to share the 'beauty of the female body' with as large number of people as possible, either.

Both do this for Money.

AndreConrad
Jul 20th, 2008, 07:43 PM
And people like you use highfalutin' languange like "freedom of expression" to try and fool people into believing that the head you're thinking with is the one above your shoulders. :tape:

The only mistake my "head" made regardless of its location is the naive thought that it is possible to reason with certain category of people. I will not make that mistake again. Live your life in peace :wavey:

Fire_Fox
Jul 20th, 2008, 08:31 PM
she is not the sexiest, but ... I would f***ed her! :devil:

AndreConrad
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:07 PM
Posing for Playboy, Hustler, etc, may have something to do with freedom (of personal choice), but nothing with 'self-expression', nor 'beauty'. And Ashley Harkleroad exercised that freedom, and she did it neither to express herself, nor the 'beauty of the female athlete's body'. A prostitute doesn't do what she does because she is driven by desire to share the 'beauty of the female body' with as large number of people as possible, either.

Both do this for Money.

Malva I have no doubt about presence of brain cells in your head from previous conversations we had, however we are too far apart on this issue therefore I think we will have to agree to disagree. My arguments with the other person were more about what he (she?) considers perversion less about Ashley (which I believe is her business what she does anyway). Going back to Ashley I have no idea what were her motivations and the extent to which money played role in her decision. I can only speculate that it could be money or something else, like drawing attention. I am not sure if you noticed; a lot of people in the entertainment industry likes attention. They love big stage and people cheering for them, in fact if they did not like it they would have hard time performing. Whatever the performance is, others appreciation of it is the source of energy for them.I am willing to speculate that this played a big part in her decision.

kiwifan
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:11 PM
Posing for Playboy, Hustler, etc, may have something to do with freedom (of personal choice), but nothing with 'self-expression', nor 'beauty'. And Ashley Harkleroad exercised that freedom, and she did it neither to express herself, nor the 'beauty of the female athlete's body'. A prostitute doesn't do what she does because she is driven by desire to share the 'beauty of the female body' with as large number of people as possible, either.

Both do this for Money.

Actually she more likely did it "to get attention" than for whatever $$$, Hef is throwing her way. Lots of actresses have done Playboy for the same reason. You show me a has-been or never was who still wants to be and she can still look good airbrushed; I'll bet you Playboy is in her future. :p

Henin had to retire prematurely to get her name in regular rotation outside of the tennis "boxscores".

Pebbles is taking a less drastic option; that may lead to her becoming the 4th most mentioned active tennis player of the next year or two (behind Williams, Williams & Pova LLC) ahead of even the number one ranked player on the planet. :devil:

AnomyBC
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:43 PM
Sorry, there is a big difference between artistic nudes which are meant to show the beauty of the human body and trashy smut like this which is intended as masturbation material for pervs. This ain't celebrating her body, it's exploiting it. :tape:

It is porn, but I don't think there's anything particularly trashy about it. And it's certainly a celebration of her body. I don't see how that part can be disputed :drool::hearts:

And they paid her well, so it's not exploitation. You could just as easily argue that Ashley exploited men's horniness to make some cash :)

Zébulon
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:49 PM
If it is wrong for Ashley to pose for those pictures, is it wrong for everyone else to do so? Well if it is wrong for her it has to be wrong for all other models. If that is true publishing Playboy has to be wrong. Is this where your thinking is going?... Again I am not trying to be hostile, if I was I would make a sarkastic statement about burning Playboy. Instead just let me tell you that is is more than okay for Ashley or anyone else to express herself as she pleases. If her motivations are shallow or deeper than anyone else knows it is her business. She is not hurting anyone with what she is doing, not herself, not other women not tennis. If you guys don't like it then don't look at the pictures and don't read about it.
I never said this kind of pics or mag should be forbidden, did I ? :rolleyes:

And if you can't see how degrading it is for tennis that a female player does this, and you can't see how degrading it is for women, especially as she seems to say it's so cool to do... :rolleyes: rolleyes:

What do you mean "express herself" ? What did she express ? Besides, it's public stuff, so it's not just her business, quite the contrary, actually.

I would add that your last line is complete nonsense. We can have an opinion, and sure, I won't look at them another time, once was more than enugh, but what has it got to do with our issue. :??:

Like I said before, there's room between "it's so cool, freedom of speech, art, so on" and "burn the *itch" Seems some won't read properly unless it's one of the twho extremes...

I'll simplify it for you. Posing for porn is degrading and it's sad that a girl with once a promising a life and future as Ashley has gone down this path. It's that simple. :tape:
:worship:

AnomyBC
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:49 PM
And people like you use highfalutin' languange like "freedom of expression" to try and fool people into believing that the head you're thinking with is the one above your shoulders. :tape:

I don't think it's a matter of thinking with the wrong head, I think it's a matter of being able to look at the idea of posing nude in a way that's rational vs. a way that's irrational. I think anyone who claims that posing nude is somehow immoral is failing to look at the issue rationally.

Zébulon
Jul 20th, 2008, 09:52 PM
Freedom of expression means Ashley can pose for crap pics if she wants, but also that we can comment on it and find it degrading and she'd better not have done it. :shrug:

AnomyBC
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:00 PM
And if you can't see how degrading it is for tennis that a female player does this, and you can't see how degrading it is for women, especially as she seems to say it's so cool to do... rolleyes:

I think people can choose to see it as either degrading to women or celebrating women, but it's not inherently one thing or the other. I obviously see it as being a celebration of female beauty and female athletes, and that comes from the way I see the issues of sexuality and nudity in general. If people see the issues of sexuality and nudity in a more negative light, then they're inevitably going to see Ashley posing for Playboy in a negative light, but that has more to do with the mindset of the viewer than anything Ashley herself did.

DaMamaJama87
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:09 PM
I don't think it's a matter of thinking with the wrong head, I think it's a matter of being able to look at the idea of posing nude in a way that's rational vs. a way that's irrational. I think anyone who claims that posing nude is somehow immoral is failing to look at the issue rationally.

Sorry, I don't understand why people refuse to even read my posts before commenting. This is not an Annie Liebowitz black and white body shot. This is porn designed for the express purpose of getting some horny dude off. Please look up the meanings of multisyllabic words like "irrational" before using them. :help: :tape:

AnomyBC
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:12 PM
Sorry, I don't understand why people refuse to even read my posts before commenting. This is not an Annie Liebowitz black and white body shot. This is porn designed for the express purpose of getting some horny dude off. Please look up the meanings of multisyllabic words like "irrational" before using them. :help: :tape:

It's irrational because there's nothing logically wrong with a person posing nude. Any negatives attached to it come purely from the mind of the viewer.

DaMamaJama87
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:19 PM
It's irrational because there's nothing logically wrong with a person posing nude. Any negatives attached to it come purely from the mind of the viewer.

Why did you not read my post again? Please read my posts before commenting so that your responses actually have some relevance to what was said before. Please try again. :kiss: :wavey:

Malva
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:23 PM
Going back to Ashley I have no idea what were her motivations and the extent to which money played role in her decision. I can only speculate that it could be money or something else, like drawing attention. I am not sure if you noticed; a lot of people in the entertainment industry likes attention. They love big stage and people cheering for them, in fact if they did not like it they would have hard time performing. Whatever the performance is, others appreciation of it is the source of energy for them.I am willing to speculate that this played a big part in her decision.

Stripping herself of clothes while playing at the Center Court in Wimbledon, Roland Garros, or Flushing Meadows, would bring her immeasurably more attention, I can assure you. And I can also assure, a lot of people in the audience would be cheering wildly. What bigger stage one can dream of?

Moreover, there would be plenty of people, especially in this forum, who would consider that to be the coolest thing to do, or would be defending her action as 'freedom of expression', 'because she was proud of her body', or on any other, similarly untenable ground.

[Sorry, I can't continue, Woźniak is playing really well]

Morrissey
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:25 PM
I think Ashley is really lame it is obvious this young woman doesn't have GOOD INFLUENCES in her life. She is so desperate for CASH OFF the tennis court because she was NEVER good player ON the court. I mean look at her track record married at the tender age of 19 and divorced at 21. And now her new boyfriend convinces her to spread it in Playboy. SAD my dear SAD. Ashley is going to REGRET this decision just for a few dollars.

Morrissey
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:27 PM
I don't see it as a celebration of female beauty I see this playboy spread as degrading because it is. Here you have a young clueless woman that obviously has NO GUIDANCE in her life. She just FOLLOWS whatever man in her life tells her to do. And now she will have to LIVE with this decision FOREVER.

AndreConrad
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:30 PM
(...)
[Sorry, I can't continue, Woźniak is playing really well]

I agree, Aleksandra is doing well... but as I said we will have to agree to disagree :wavey:

AnomyBC
Jul 20th, 2008, 10:35 PM
Stripping herself of clothes while playing at the Center Court in Wimbledon, Roland Garros, or Flushing Meadows, would bring her immeasurably more attention, I can assure you. And I can also assure, a lot of people in the audience would be cheering wildly.

Moreover, there would be plenty of people, especially in this forum, who would consider that to be the coolest thing to do, or would be defending her action as 'freedom of expression', 'because she was proud of her body', or on any other, similarly untenable ground.

[Sorry, I can't continue, Woźniak is playing really well]

Well the difference between that and Playboy is that Playboy is an appropriate forum for nudity and Centre Court at Wimbledon, etc is not :)

As far as her motivations, I think it was a combination of the money, the desire to be seen as beautiful, the desire to be remembered for something, and just the joy a person gets from doing something that's a little bit crazy and outside of their normal life experiences.

Malva
Jul 21st, 2008, 12:10 AM
I agree, Aleksandra is doing well... but as I said we will have to agree to disagree :wavey:

I regret you didn't appreciate the irony and the sense of humor contained in my post.

AndreConrad
Jul 21st, 2008, 12:29 AM
I regret you didn't appreciate the irony and the sense of humor contained in my post.

You are right I got to worked up in this argument. ... Still Aleks' match was good, definitely better than naked pictures... not as good as naked girls themselevs though :lol:

Super Dave
Jul 21st, 2008, 01:35 PM
I guess I'm a bit disappointed in the pics, but probably not for the reason that most are. I think Ashley is one of those naturally pretty southern belles who looks great without makeup. Of course, she can't go w/o makeup for the spread, but her all made up was a small letdown. Just didn't look as good as I had anticipated. :scratch:

spiritedenergy
Jul 21st, 2008, 02:48 PM
Ashley is all over the main Italian online newspapers... titles saying that she made history being the first tennis player in Playboy (and showing all the pictures except the crotch:spit:)

Malva
Jul 23rd, 2008, 09:03 PM
Harkleroad's motives were examined by many posters in this thread. Some thought that Money was the reason:

Posing for Playboy, Hustler, etc, may have something to do with freedom (of personal choice), but nothing with 'self-expression', nor 'beauty'. And Ashley Harkleroad exercised that freedom, and she did it neither to express herself, nor the 'beauty of the female athlete's body'. A prostitute doesn't do what she does because she is driven by desire to share the 'beauty of the female body' with as large number of people as possible, either.

Both do this for Money.

Many disagreed and opined that gaining attention was her main reason. Just one example:

Actually she more likely did it "to get attention" than for whatever $$$, Hef is throwing her way.

This is what Harkleroad had to say on the matter in an interview at the outset of the LA tournament:

she admits that money played a role in her decision (she is said to have been paid 250,000)

$250,000 is a lot more than she earned on-court this year and there were no colateral costs involved.

Clumsythief
Jul 24th, 2008, 01:19 AM
Any chance we see Golovin in Playboy if her career goes nowhere? That's THE girl I would like to see in Playboy. I wouldn't mind a sextape either :drool:

AnomyBC
Jul 24th, 2008, 03:03 AM
Any chance we see Golovin in Playboy if her career goes nowhere?

Good news! It's looking more likely every day :lol:

Miranda
Jul 24th, 2008, 04:07 AM
can't we watch some photos in internet free :confused::p

Tennis Fool
Jul 24th, 2008, 05:17 AM
The arguments in this thread had me :rolls: Classic stuff :yeah:

03 RuleTheCourt
Jul 24th, 2008, 09:49 AM
Any chance we see Golovin in Playboy if her career goes nowhere? That's THE girl I would like to see in Playboy. I wouldn't mind a sextape either :drool:
lol, it looks i'm not the only one who dared to put that on the forum, :worship:
Go Tati :lick:, definitely better than Harkleroad, she got package :lol:.

Huntress55
Jul 24th, 2008, 09:53 AM
Argh, I wish I hadnt of seen those. I always thought she was a pretty girl, but those photos dont look that good, she could have looked waaaaaaay better.
But oh well, each to their own I guess.

SharapovaFan16
Jul 24th, 2008, 04:43 PM
Some of you people on here are "el loco". The pictures are very nice, escpecially the one where she is bending over in the tennis skirt. MmmmMMMM MMmMMMMmmm. Did I look at these pics to "whack" off to them? OF COURSE NOT, and I'm a 20 year old male the horniest of the bunch.

I was just curious as to how Ashley would look and I think she looks great. She made a financially smart business decision and people are knocking her? I don't get it. Do any of you know her? What if she needed some extra cash and this opportunity presented itself? Are some of you telling me that if Playboy knocked on your door step and you weren't in desperation mode for cash, but still needed a little bit to make you feel comfortable financially you would say no?

People who look at Playboy as a disgusting magazine have tunnel vision and probably haven't even read or even glanced at an issue before? How can you judge and label something when the most you have seen of the damn thing over the years is the front cover!? Sure some guys buy it for "whack" off material, but the same amount of men buy it just to look at beautiful women who are nude, & a good handful of them even read the articles.

What about Maxim? Do the people that have a problem with Playboy have a problem with Maxim? I could go at this all day long.

GREAT PHOTOS ASHLEY!!!

BUBI
Jul 24th, 2008, 08:12 PM
I swear I'm as horny as anybody and I don't find the pictures hot :shrug:

spiritedenergy
Jul 24th, 2008, 08:48 PM
Some of you people on here are "el loco". The pictures are very nice, escpecially the one where she is bending over in the tennis skirt. MmmmMMMM MMmMMMMmmm. Did I look at these pics to "whack" off to them? OF COURSE NOT, and I'm a 20 year old male the horniest of the bunch.

I was just curious as to how Ashley would look and I think she looks great. She made a financially smart business decision and people are knocking her? I don't get it. Do any of you know her? What if she needed some extra cash and this opportunity presented itself? Are some of you telling me that if Playboy knocked on your door step and you weren't in desperation mode for cash, but still needed a little bit to make you feel comfortable financially you would say no?

People who look at Playboy as a disgusting magazine have tunnel vision and probably haven't even read or even glanced at an issue before? How can you judge and label something when the most you have seen of the damn thing over the years is the front cover!? Sure some guys buy it for "whack" off material, but the same amount of men buy it just to look at beautiful women who are nude, & a good handful of them even read the articles.

What about Maxim? Do the people that have a problem with Playboy have a problem with Maxim? I could go at this all day long.

GREAT PHOTOS ASHLEY!!!

Good Christian, you are going against God :scared:

saint2
Jul 24th, 2008, 08:52 PM
can't we watch some photos in internet free :confused::p

We can... Of course we can...There was a link to all photos...

cosmoose
Jul 26th, 2008, 07:59 AM
Ashley. :)
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k118/cozmoose/015.jpg

DaMamaJama87
Jul 26th, 2008, 04:45 PM
Ashley. :)
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k118/cozmoose/015.jpg


Photobucket agrees that the pictures are obscene. What more proof do you need? :tape: :lol:

MeGa-Fan
Aug 10th, 2008, 03:24 PM
I think this thread i almost forgotten, but i wanted to add something to it.

I think it's no problem what ashley did, its nice when you are capable of showing your body...i think thats great and it doesnt meen she isn't a good person anymore, absolutely wrong.
some photos are nice, but some are to nice, like she is smiling and so and you very rare see top models smiling!
AND wasn't there something about Nuria Llagosterra, doing something similar?
thanks for the pics link!

lynxy
Aug 11th, 2008, 08:50 AM
Ah yes, they talk about Nuria here:
http://www.tennisforum.com/showthread.php?t=341962
I always called Nuria "the shortest legs in tennis". She says "I may not be as tall or beautiful as the Russians, but I have my own pretty aspects."