PDA

View Full Version : Double-Bagel record for players


Mynarco
Aug 1st, 2007, 03:23 AM
2000 ERICSSON OPEN HARD M. HINGIS d M. SELES 6-0 6-0 :eek:

mila_mail
Aug 1st, 2007, 05:55 AM
indian wells
davenport def sharapova 60 60

Alexj
Aug 1st, 2007, 06:09 AM
2006 Quebec City Final: M. Bartoli def. O. Poutchkova 6-0, 6-0
__________________________________________________ ____________________

~Marion Bartoli~ Anna Chakvetadze~ Ana Ivanovic~ Jelena Jankovic~ Patty Schnyder~ Daniela Hantuchova~ Vera Zvonareva~ Dinara Safina~ Nadia Petrova~ Elena Dementieva~

Hashim.
Aug 1st, 2007, 06:19 AM
Monica was injured i think :shrug: but stilll played

Hashim.
Aug 1st, 2007, 06:20 AM
Monica was injured i think :shrug: but stilll played

RJWCapriati
Aug 1st, 2007, 07:03 AM
2002 Rome R16

J. Capriati defs. M. Pierce

6-0, 6-0

RJWCapriati
Aug 1st, 2007, 07:04 AM
1995 Canadian Open R16

M. Pierce defs M. Hingis

6-0, 6-0

samn
Aug 1st, 2007, 10:06 AM
One of the most impressive double bagels has got to be the 1981 Amelia Island final.

Bitch Chris Evert Lloyd d. Martina Navratilova 6-0 6-0

Poor Martina! :sad:

(just kidding about the "bitch" part, btw)

Beny
Aug 1st, 2007, 10:08 AM
OGdF- Paris Indoors 2003, SF
Mauresmo def. Dementieva 60,60 :shrug:

So Disrespectful
Aug 1st, 2007, 10:13 AM
2000 ERICSSON OPEN HARD M. HINGIS d M. SELES 6-0 6-0 :eek:

Seles rolled her ankle the day prior and still played.

darice
Aug 1st, 2007, 10:32 AM
1995 Canadian Open R16

M. Pierce defs M. Hingis

6-0, 6-0

:eek:

NeeemZ
Aug 1st, 2007, 11:12 AM
Mauresmo def. Stosur 6-0 6-0 in either Indian Wells or Miami in 2006

NeeemZ
Aug 1st, 2007, 11:15 AM
The last double bagel in a GS Final - Graf def. Zvereva RG 1988 6-0 6-0

Demska
Aug 1st, 2007, 11:15 AM
Clijsetrs def Bardina 60 60 AO 2007 R128

ChampLindsay
Aug 1st, 2007, 11:16 AM
US Open 06
Lindsay def. Kostanic 6:0 6:0

Dubai 06:
Lindsay def. Likhovtseva 6:0 6:0

Indian Wells 06:

Lindsay def. Harkleroad 6:0 6:0

BAGELQUEEN:worship: :worship:

Craigy
Aug 1st, 2007, 11:21 AM
Roland Garros 2003
Serena def. Schett - 6-0 6-0

Paul.
Aug 1st, 2007, 11:55 AM
Australian Open 1998

R1: Mary Pierce def. Fang Li 6-0 6-0

Then 3 rounds later..

R4: Mary Pierce def. Henrieta Nagyova 6-0 6-0

:D


Shame she lost in the quarters :tape:

Paul.
Aug 1st, 2007, 12:02 PM
Look at this run for Pierce to the final of the French Open in 1994..

R1: Mary Pierce def. Nicole Bradtke 6-1 6-0
R2: Mary Pierce def. Francesca Bentivoglio 6-0 6-1
R3: Mary Pierce def. Lori McNeil 6-0 6-0
R4: Mary Pierce def. Amanda Coetzer 6-1 6-1
QF: Mary Pierce def. Petra Schwarz 6-0 6-2
SF: Mary Pierce def. Steffi Graf 6-2 6-2

:eek::eek::eek:

That could possibly be the easiest run to a grand slam final ever! She only lost 10 games!

I can't believe she lost 4-6 4-6 to Sanchez-Vicario in the final :o

Otherwise it could have gone down in the history books as the easiest slam win ever :lol:

frenchie
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:04 PM
Myskina def Wartusch 6/0-6/0 Fed Cup SF 2004

dreamgoddess099
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:05 PM
Roland Garros 2003
Serena def. Schett - 6-0 6-0

S Williams def. L Neiland - 6-0 6-0

Believe it or not, these are Serena's only two double bagels of her entire career. Now this means either two things, either Serena often throws her opponents a bone, or she really isn't as intimidating as people claim because more often than not, most players seem to pull themselves together enough to at least take 1 game off her.

Now compare to Kim "Congeniality" Clijsters

K Clijsters def. P Mandula 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. R de los Rios 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. M Camerin 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. V Bardina 6-0 6-0

Interesting stuff huh? Looks like Kim is more ruthless on court than Serena.

Chunchun
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:06 PM
IW 05 Davenport def. Sharapova 6-0 6-0 :worship::worship::worship:
USO 06 Sharapova def. Mauresmo 6-0 4-6 6-0 :o

papru
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:17 PM
Guys, did you forget about Brie Whitehead :lol:

Kerber def Brie 60 60

Nza def Brie 60 60

Pandzic def Brie 60 60

Podkolzina def Brie 60 60

Jugic-Salkic def Brie 60 60

Olaru def Brie 60 60

Rakhim def Brie 60 60

Klepac def Brie 60 60

Gagliardi def Brie 60 60

Nanda Kumar def Brie 60 60

Ozgen def Brie 60 60

Nguyen def Brie 60 60

Osterloh def Brie 60 60

Dekmeijere def Brie 60 60

Ritchey def Brie 60 60

Dillon def Brie 60 60

Bejlkova def Brie 60 60

Valicekova def Brie 60 60

Lee def Brie 60 60




Bagel Queen :p

Princeza
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:20 PM
2000 ERICSSON OPEN HARD M. HINGIS d M. SELES 6-0 6-0 :eek:

that was awful

Lennval
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:23 PM
Kournikova def Wartusch 6-0, 6-0 in first round AO i don't remember the year

sammy01
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:24 PM
2002 Rome R16

J. Capriati defs. M. Pierce

6-0, 6-0

good old mary pierce claimed this was a positive experience in the press confrence afterwards! :worship:

roelc
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:25 PM
S Williams def. L Neiland - 6-0 6-0

Believe it or not, these are Serena's only two double bagels of her entire career. Now this means either two things, either Serena often throws her opponents a bone, or she really isn't as intimidating as people claim because more often than not, most players seem to pull themselves together enough to at least take 1 game off her.

Now compare to Kim "Congeniality" Clijsters

K Clijsters def. P Mandula 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. R de los Rios 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. M Camerin 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. V Bardina 6-0 6-0

Interesting stuff huh? Looks like Kim is more ruthless on court than Serena.

K Clijsters def. M Marrero 6-0 6-0 (US Open 2000)
K Clijsters def. A Morigami 4-6 6-0 6-0 (Miami 2007) :D

supergrunt
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:27 PM
S Williams def. L Neiland - 6-0 6-0

Believe it or not, these are Serena's only two double bagels of her entire career. Now this means either two things, either Serena often throws her opponents a bone, or she really isn't as intimidating as people claim because more often than not, most players seem to pull themselves together enough to at least take 1 game off her.

Now compare to Kim "Congeniality" Clijsters

K Clijsters def. P Mandula 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. R de los Rios 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. M Camerin 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. V Bardina 6-0 6-0

Interesting stuff huh? Looks like Kim is more ruthless on court than Serena.

I think it is the aforementioned reason :) !

sammy01
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:32 PM
S Williams def. L Neiland - 6-0 6-0

Believe it or not, these are Serena's only two double bagels of her entire career. Now this means either two things, either Serena often throws her opponents a bone, or she really isn't as intimidating as people claim because more often than not, most players seem to pull themselves together enough to at least take 1 game off her.

Now compare to Kim "Congeniality" Clijsters

K Clijsters def. P Mandula 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. R de los Rios 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. M Camerin 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. V Bardina 6-0 6-0

Interesting stuff huh? Looks like Kim is more ruthless on court than Serena.

sorry to dispell your theory but i think the real reason is that serena is simply a far more aggresive player than clisters! for serena to play 12 games where shes constantly going for winners and not play a game where she misses more than she makes is near impossible! where as clijsters who is attacking but not on a serena level puts more topspin on the ball and plays with more margin for error so if clijsters is head and shoulders above the oposition then a double bagel is more likely where as serena can be head and shoulders above a player and still lose games because she does exactly that 'loses' the games!

Demska
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:35 PM
Li def. Pierce 46 60 60 US Open R32 2006

supergrunt
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:40 PM
sorry to dispell your theory but i think the real reason is that serena is simply a far more aggresive player than clisters! for serena to play 12 games where shes constantly going for winners and not play a game where she misses more than she makes is near impossible! where as clijsters who is attacking but not on a serena level puts more topspin on the ball and plays with more margin for error so if clijsters is head and shoulders above the oposition then a double bagel is more likely where as serena can be head and shoulders above a player and still lose games because she does exactly that 'loses' the games!

I get your explanation :D !

sammy01
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:42 PM
I get your explanation :D !

few i usualy get explantion like that all wrong :lol:

WonderfulLee
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:44 PM
Australia Open 1998

R16 1-martina Hingis def. yayuk basuki (wta-24) 6-0 6-0

saki
Aug 1st, 2007, 01:48 PM
Interesting stuff huh? Looks like Kim is more ruthless on court than Serena.

It is interesting. Justine doesn't really double bagel either, despite her "ruthless" image.

IW against Nakamura in 2006
AO against Lukaszewicz in 2004 (and she got bagelled in the first round of the junior tournament too :help: )

With Justine, I think it's just that she loses concentration when it's too easy. She wins a lot of early matches 6-1 6-1 or similar scores, but not double bagels.

DA FOREHAND
Aug 1st, 2007, 02:17 PM
US Open 06
Lindsay def. Kostanic 6:0 6:0

Dubai 06:
Lindsay def. Likhovtseva 6:0 6:0

Indian Wells 06:

Lindsay def. Harkleroad 6:0 6:0

BAGELQUEEN:worship: :worship:

Mary Pierce used to be the bagel queen esp. in her early round matches.

Lindsay's nickname in HS was Bagel Queen or something like that.

lecciones
Aug 1st, 2007, 03:45 PM
Martina wasn't ruthless too but her double bagels aren't that much even if she has given 117 bagel sets in her career:

1) AO 1998 R16 H2H BASUKI, YAYUK 24 W 6-0 6-0
2) MIAMI 1998 R32 H2H (21) KRUGER, JOANNETTE 23 W 6-0 6-0
3) ERICSSON OPEN 2000 S H2H (7) SELES, MONICA 8 W 6-0 6-0
4) 2006 TOKYO R32 H2H (L) CHO, YOON JEONG KOR 61 W 6-0 6-0

LoveFifteen
Aug 1st, 2007, 04:14 PM
:eek:

Jesus, it was 1995. She was 14 yrs old! :rolleyes:

Mr. Magassi
Aug 1st, 2007, 04:19 PM
Capriati def. Wood 6-0, 6-0 (Wightman Cup -- Jenn was 13 years old and it was her first pro-tour match :)

Capriati def. Mattek 6-0, 6-0 (1st round, US Open 2002)

darice
Aug 1st, 2007, 04:23 PM
Jesus, it was 1995. She was 14 yrs old! :rolleyes:

oh i totally got that but the reason i was :eek: is cause marti's such a great counterpuncher that eventho she could be dominated at times by the big hitters, she could still manage to win a few games. i don't think was marti ever dbl-bagelled by any of the big hitters even at 14.

dreamgoddess099
Aug 1st, 2007, 04:44 PM
sorry to dispell your theory but i think the real reason is that serena is simply a far more aggresive player than clisters! for serena to play 12 games where shes constantly going for winners and not play a game where she misses more than she makes is near impossible! where as clijsters who is attacking but not on a serena level puts more topspin on the ball and plays with more margin for error so if clijsters is head and shoulders above the oposition then a double bagel is more likely where as serena can be head and shoulders above a player and still lose games because she does exactly that 'loses' the games!

That makes sense, but I don't agree. Not to dispel your theory, but Serena has been close to a double bagel just as many times as Kim. So if Kim's so called less aggression supposedly helps her to attain the double bagel more often than Serena, then in turn it should also help her to be close to the double bagel a lot more often than Serena, which it doesn't. I find it hard to believe that Serena or Kim couldn't bare down to win one more game to get the double bagel more often if they really wanted to.



S Williams Def. C Morariu 6-1 6-0
S Williams def. M Serna 6-1 6-0
S Williams def. K Po 6-1 6-0
S Williams def. R Dragomir Ilie 6-0 6-1
S Williams def. A Frazier 6-0 6-1
S Williams def. R Kuti Kis 6-1 6-0
S Williams def. M Sucha 6-1 6-0
S Williams def. K Srebotnik 6-1 6-0
S Williams def. D Safina 6-0 6-1
S Williams def. N Pratt 6-1 6-0
S Williams def. M Marrero 6-1 6-0
S Williams def. J Craybas 6-0 6-1
S Williams def. K Mc Cain 6-1 6-0
S Williams def. M Sequera 6-1 6-0


K Clijsters def. N Llagostera Vives 6-0 6-1
K Clijsters def. C Martinez-Granados 6-1 6-0
K Clijsters def. B Rittner 6-1 6-0
K Clijsters def. Ruano Pascual 6-1 6-0
K Clijsters def. V Ruano Pascual 6-1 6-0
K Clijsters def. J Husarova 6-0 6-1
K Clijsters def. M Sanchez Lorenzo 6-1 6-0
K Clijsters def. S Kloesel-Q 6-0 6-1
K Clijsters def. A Mauresmo 6-1 6-0
K Clijsters def. Y Fedak-Q 6-1 6-0
K Clijsters def. M Tu 6-1 6-0
K Clijsters def. F Pennetta 6-0 6-1
K Clijsters def. M Vento-Kabchi 6-1 6-0
K Clijsters def. D Safina(4) 6-0 6-1
K Clijsters def. S Kloesel 6-1 6-0

Rollo
Aug 1st, 2007, 04:52 PM
I find it hard to believe that Serena couldn't bare down to win one more game to get the double bagel if she really wanted to

Higher risk tennis produces more errors, and it's easy to drop a game or two on errors playing Serena's style of tennis. You can say the same thing for serve and volleyers-who also rarely win in double bagels.

CORIA01
Aug 1st, 2007, 04:53 PM
2000 ERICSSON OPEN HARD M. HINGIS d M. SELES 6-0 6-0
SAME FOR ME

misael
Aug 1st, 2007, 04:58 PM
S Williams def. L Neiland - 6-0 6-0

Believe it or not, these are Serena's only two double bagels of her entire career. Now this means either two things, either Serena often throws her opponents a bone, or she really isn't as intimidating as people claim because more often than not, most players seem to pull themselves together enough to at least take 1 game off her.

Now compare to Kim "Congeniality" Clijsters

K Clijsters def. P Mandula 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. R de los Rios 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. M Camerin 6-0 6-0
K Clijsters def. V Bardina 6-0 6-0

Interesting stuff huh? Looks like Kim is more ruthless on court than Serena.

Serena is a slow starter,it usually takes her a few games to warm up.

tennisfan5
Aug 1st, 2007, 05:22 PM
Monica was injured then, and I remember moron journalists suggesting she should/might retire. Thankfully, Monica re-established herself against Martina at the end of '00 and in '01.

Speaking of Monica (12 DB):

1989 def. Kelesi 6-0, 6-0

1990 def. Piccolini 6-0, 6-0

1990 def. Wagner 6-0, 6-0

1991 def. Kidowaki 6-0, 6-0

1992 def. G. Fernandez 6-0, 6-0

1992 def. Paz 6-0, 6-0

1997 def. Grande 6-0, 6-0

1999 def. Weingartner 6-0, 6-0

2000 def. Pitkowski 6-0, 6-0

2000 def. De Lone 6-0, 6-0

2001 def. nemeckova 6-0, 6-0

2002 def. Bes 6-0, 6-0

!<blocparty>!
Aug 1st, 2007, 05:28 PM
Look at this run for Pierce to the final of the French Open in 1994..

R1: Mary Pierce def. Nicole Bradtke 6-1 6-0
R2: Mary Pierce def. Francesca Bentivoglio 6-0 6-1
R3: Mary Pierce def. Lori McNeil 6-0 6-0
R4: Mary Pierce def. Amanda Coetzer 6-1 6-1
QF: Mary Pierce def. Petra Schwarz 6-0 6-2
SF: Mary Pierce def. Steffi Graf 6-2 6-2

:eek::eek::eek:

That could possibly be the easiest run to a grand slam final ever! She only lost 10 games!

I can't believe she lost 4-6 4-6 to Sanchez-Vicario in the final :o

Otherwise it could have gone down in the history books as the easiest slam win ever :lol:

Mary :sad:.

Sally Struthers
Aug 1st, 2007, 06:15 PM
someone post Chris Evert's record. Isn't she the double bagel queen?