PDA

View Full Version : kim vs. hingis


marlon
Apr 4th, 2007, 09:49 PM
who's better

TaxPower
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:02 PM
Hingis the most talented. Kim the most powerful. So I'd say Kim Hingis would be a great player... But if I have to choose I'd say Martina

Karolina_Sprem
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:03 PM
who's better


Hingis for sure...:wavey:

cellophane
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:04 PM
Hingis. Better player and more talented. Kim has the better game though.

Serena_thebest
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:10 PM
kim

PLP
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:13 PM
Martina without a doubt. Though Kim's game is definitely more competitive with the top players, at least right now.

all_slam_andre
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:13 PM
Hingis has 5 grand slam titles and 209 weeks as world no.1. Clijsters has 1 grand slam title and 19 weeks as world no.1. Martina without a doubt

PLP
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:14 PM
Hingis the most talented. Kim the most powerful. So I'd say Kim Hingis would be a great player... But if I have to choose I'd say Martina

Or Martina Clijsters. ;)

DavidEllul
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:16 PM
martina has achieved more..

Demska
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:17 PM
Well, you can be a better player in many ways.

Right now if thye were to play, Kim would win.

LoveFifteen
Apr 4th, 2007, 10:50 PM
Since her comeback, Martina has never beaten Clijsters, but Martina v.2.0 isn't the same player. She's slower and she's less consistent. :sad:

That being said, there are few people alive who would rather have Kim's career over Martina's ... except maybe people who -- like Clijsters herself -- care about collecting friends and not trophies.

Pleasantville
Apr 4th, 2007, 11:09 PM
Hingis has had a more impressive career.

TSequoia01
Apr 4th, 2007, 11:16 PM
True Hingis has the greater career, also true if they were to play tonight Kim would defeat her.

-jenks-
Apr 4th, 2007, 11:19 PM
H2H Kim no question, but Hingis has the better career.

MatchpointPRT
Apr 4th, 2007, 11:49 PM
The H2H doesn´t mean anything. Martina is 15-5 against Monica and that never meant that Martina is a better player or that she has been a better player than peak Monica.

Volcana
Apr 4th, 2007, 11:52 PM
It's funny. Clijster is undoubtedly a better tennis player. But Hingis has had a FAR greater career.

John.
Apr 5th, 2007, 12:42 AM
Hingis

go hingis
Apr 5th, 2007, 01:14 AM
Martina hands down. Kim might win now but only because Martina had 3 years off.

lecciones
Apr 5th, 2007, 01:02 PM
Martina Clijster would dominate todays tennis, imagine kim's strength and martina's brain wow. My answer is Martina, just give her time she will defeat kim again, too bad there isn't much time left for Kim on the tour.

pooh14
Apr 5th, 2007, 01:07 PM
if you are talking about martina hingis overall, definitely hingis is so much better.

but if u r talking of hingis v2.0, then it is another story.

Tennisaddict
Apr 5th, 2007, 01:33 PM
Another thread where a relevant comparison can´t be made.
Why don´t you compare Clijsters to Kuznetsova or Myskina who all have won one grandslam?

And Hingis should be compared to Venus and/or Henin.

Mauresmo with Pierce and/or Sharapova.

CORIA01
Apr 5th, 2007, 02:20 PM
hingis!!!

martinahfan
Apr 5th, 2007, 03:28 PM
hingis yessssssssssssssssssssssss