PDA

View Full Version : Vaidisova is the youngest player in the top 100 still!!


Tennace
Oct 5th, 2006, 11:18 PM
I didn't realize this but Nicole is still the youngest player in the top 100 :eek: :eek: :worship: :worship: :bounce: :bounce: Here are the 4 youngest players in the top 100.

1. Vaidisova- April 23, 1989
2. Radwanska- March 6, 1989
3. King- February 3, 1989
4. Krajicek- Janurary 9, 1989

iPatty
Oct 5th, 2006, 11:20 PM
she won't be for much longer, when tamira paszek enters the mix. :cool: :D

kittyking
Oct 6th, 2006, 12:12 AM
Can you add to that list the youngest players in the top 200, that would be more interesting

NyCPsU
Oct 6th, 2006, 12:14 AM
king :yeah:

parn2257
Oct 6th, 2006, 12:40 AM
nice job nicloe

fufuqifuqishahah
Oct 6th, 2006, 01:48 AM
wow these girls aren't even THAT young.

~SunFlower~
Oct 6th, 2006, 03:01 AM
Maria is still the youngest one in the top 8 since her Wimbledon win in 2004, that's pretty amazing. :)

DutchieGirl
Oct 6th, 2006, 04:55 AM
Hmm Misa's second youngest in the top 50 then. :D

Si_Hi
Oct 6th, 2006, 04:56 AM
so what?

RND
Oct 6th, 2006, 07:20 AM
8/17/1989,Yung-Jan is ready to take the record. ;)
(If she could upset Ai later,she'd crack 100 :eek: !)

RND
Oct 6th, 2006, 07:39 AM
Can you add to that list the youngest players in the top 200, that would be more interesting
Here are players born after Jan/1/1989 and right now in WTA top250:
(resource from TBE's list ;) thanks TBE.)

11 Nicole Vaidisova 23/04/89 CZE
36 Michaella Krajicek 09/01/89 NED
66 Agnieszka Radwanska 06/03/89 POL :)
78 Vania King 03/02/89 USA :)
118 Vika Azarenka 31/07/89 BLR
119 Yung-Jan Chan 17/08/89 TPE :hearts:
156 Tamira Paszek 06/12/90 AUT
171 Ayumi Morita 11/03/90 JPN :D
172 Timea Bacsinszky 08/06/89 SUI
190 Alize Cornet 22/01/90 FRA
197 Alisa Kleybanova 15/07/89 RUS
199 Shuai Zhang 21/01/89 CHN
243 Dominika Cibulkova 06/05/89 SVK

Slumpsova
Oct 6th, 2006, 08:13 AM
Nicole is the best :D

AnDyDog621
Oct 7th, 2006, 04:48 AM
Yung-Jan Chan born on August 17 1989 might be the youngest in the TOP 100 by next week!!! woohoo!!

DutchieGirl
Oct 7th, 2006, 04:52 AM
Yung-Jan Chan born on August 17 1989 might be the youngest in the TOP 100 by next week!!! woohoo!!

Yeah, someone mentioned that before. ;)

KimC&MariaSNo1's
Oct 7th, 2006, 05:09 AM
Azarenka will be in top 100 next week too she is younger

DutchieGirl
Oct 7th, 2006, 05:12 AM
Yeah, Vika's 31st July 89

hingisGOAT
Oct 7th, 2006, 07:55 AM
and to think, sesil is a year younger and would have probably been top 20 by now :sad:

rosa de la paz
Oct 7th, 2006, 08:25 AM
i think sesil is a year older, not younger

!Gio!
Oct 7th, 2006, 08:35 AM
i think sesil is a year older, not younger

Actually Sesil is born August 8, 1989
Nicole April 23, 1989

So Sesil is almost 4 months younger ;)
But it doesnt matter because she was banned :mad:
She would have at the least been top 20 IMO :sad:

KimC&MariaSNo1's
Oct 7th, 2006, 08:55 AM
sesil wouldnt have been any higher than 30

!Gio!
Oct 7th, 2006, 09:26 AM
sesil wouldnt have been any higher than 30

thats just your opinion ;) , I think she would have been higher around 15-20, but that doesnt matter anymore as she is a druggie :sad: :o .

DutchieGirl
Oct 7th, 2006, 09:30 AM
thats just your opinion ;) , I think she would have been higher around 15-20, but that doesnt matter anymore as she is a druggie :sad: :o .

I really don't think she would be at 15 by now...she struggled alot with the top players.

Dexter
Oct 7th, 2006, 09:34 AM
Azarenka will be in top 100 next week too she is youngershe's been to Top100 already :p and since she lost to Sun she won't reenter Top100 this Monday.

controlfreak
Oct 7th, 2006, 09:37 AM
not for long, I am just putting the finishing touches to my Ageing Ray and soon she will be making Conchita Martinez look like a spring chicken!

!Gio!
Oct 7th, 2006, 09:59 AM
I really don't think she would be at 15 by now...she struggled alot with the top players.

Yeah you are right she was really struggling with the top players, but she was beating everyone else and she was only 15 at the time and still got as high as number 35.
She was just coming into her own. IMO
She would have gotten a lot of points from the clay court season and had another great performance at Roland Garros.
I think she wouldnt have been around the 15-20 range.

But that doesnt matter anymore, its not important its non-existant what is the point of saying what she would have been, when she was banned for drugs. She did what she did and they caught her for it and now all those expectations are ruined.
Hopefully in another year or so she will be back strong, but there is no point in even thinking about that as there is a long time to go.

Dexter
Oct 7th, 2006, 10:03 AM
Yeah you are right she was really struggling with the top players, but she was beating everyone else and she was only 15 at the time and still got as high as number 35.
She was just coming into her own. IMO
She would have gotten a lot of points from the clay court season and had another great performance at Roland Garros.
I think she wouldnt have been around the 15-20 range.

But that doesnt matter anymore, its not important its non-existant what is the point of saying what she would have been, when she was banned for drugs. She did what she did and they caught her for it and now all those expectations are ruined.
Hopefully in another year or so she will be back strong, but there is no point in even thinking about that as there is a long time to go.what? :spit: I still remember when she lost to Stephanie Gehrlein who was way outside Top100 if not Top200 back then :lol: :help:

!Gio!
Oct 7th, 2006, 10:15 AM
what? :spit: I still remember when she lost to Stephanie Gehrlein who was way outside Top100 if not Top200 back then :lol: :help:

Fine mostly everyone else :tape: , and towards the end there she was slumping a bit, but most of her loses came to top players or seasoned veterans. I know a lot of people didnt like the girl but come on we have to agree she was talented. And unlike a lot of her fellow younger players, she was playing in mostly tier 1 and tier 2 tournaments. (She got trashed by all the top players there at the end, her results were :eek: but who knows what was happening there with all those drugs+baby :o )


Anyway her friend Nicole Vaidisova has done a lot better for herself , so Congrads to her.

DutchieGirl
Oct 7th, 2006, 11:40 AM
Yeah you are right she was really struggling with the top players, but she was beating everyone else and she was only 15 at the time and still got as high as number 35.
She was just coming into her own. IMO
She would have gotten a lot of points from the clay court season and had another great performance at Roland Garros.
I think she wouldnt have been around the 15-20 range.

But that doesnt matter anymore, its not important its non-existant what is the point of saying what she would have been, when she was banned for drugs. She did what she did and they caught her for it and now all those expectations are ruined.
Hopefully in another year or so she will be back strong, but there is no point in even thinking about that as there is a long time to go.


Well, you were the one who brought up that you thought she'd be top 15 - I was just saying I don't think she would have. I think she would have been top 30, coz as you say, she was already at 35, but I think top 15 would be too high for her right now (if she was still playing). I used to follow Sesil, coz I like to see the younger players doing well, and it's a pity she was doing drugs...

KimC&MariaSNo1's
Oct 7th, 2006, 11:43 AM
Well, you were the one who brought up that you thought she'd be top 15 - I was just saying I don't think she would have. I think she would have been top 30, coz as you say, she was already at 35, but I think top 15 would be too high for her right now (if she was still playing). I used to follow Sesil, coz I like to see the younger players doing well, and it's a pity she was doing drugs...
i dont think she would have been in top 30 for long she was talented yes but she was not gettng grear results and i dont think she would have defended her french open points

DutchieGirl
Oct 7th, 2006, 11:45 AM
i dont think she would have been in top 30 for long she was talented yes but she was not gettng grear results and i dont think she would have defended her french open points

yeah, but it's hard for the girls under the AER too - obviously they can't play that many tourneys, and so it's harder to pick up so many points...But Sesil was doing OK for her age...

KimC&MariaSNo1's
Oct 7th, 2006, 11:54 AM
yeah, but it's hard for the girls under the AER too - obviously they can't play that many tourneys, and so it's harder to pick up so many points...But Sesil was doing OK for her age...
oh defintiely no doubt about it i guess we will never know what happens lets just hope she come back clean and earns it next time

!Gio!
Oct 7th, 2006, 11:54 AM
Well, you were the one who brought up that you thought she'd be top 15 - I was just saying I don't think she would have. I think she would have been top 30, coz as you say, she was already at 35, but I think top 15 would be too high for her right now (if she was still playing). I used to follow Sesil, coz I like to see the younger players doing well, and it's a pity she was doing drugs...


No definately, I am the one who brought that up, but not top 15, 15-25 range, but its just my opinion. I also like seeing the younger players doing well and its a pity what happened to Sesil, she was a talented girl.