PDA

View Full Version : 2006 French Open (Roland Garros) Preview


CanIGetAWhat
May 27th, 2006, 10:37 PM
2006 French Open (Roland Garros) Preview

May 25, 2006

There are currently two major storylines in tennis, and both could take dramatic turns at this year's Roland Garros (http://forums.lawntennisnews.com/).

In men's tennis, the remarkable rivalry between the world's No. 1 player, Roger Federer, and world No. 2, Rafael Nadal, has simply knocked everything else off the front pages. On the women's side, the most compelling tale has been the unexpected comeback of Martina Hingis (http://hingis.lawntennisnews.com/) and her almost meteoric climb up the rankings list.

http://www.teamwta.com/newsnow/hingis.jpg
It would seem hard to fathom that any player with a 37-3 record this year would have anyone to worry about. However, the problem for Swiss megastar Federer is that all three loses came to the same man, Spanish sensation Nadal. Only a few days shy of his 20th birthday, Nadal is the defending champion and right now the undisputed king of clay, having dispatched Federer in the finals at both Monte Carlo and Rome.

The battles have been epic. Their nearly 5-1/2-hour final in Rome was a clay court classic. The match so exhausted both players that both withdrew from Hamburg, leaving the talented Tommy Robredo in charge. It also left Federer with no clay court titles this year going into Roland Garros. Moreover, whether he admits it or not, it leaves him in the unfamiliar position of being the underdog in the fight for the only slam title he does not yet own.

He keeps saying he's getting closer to Nadal, and the fact that Rome was settled in Nadal's favor by only two points, would seem to back that up. However, "close" counts only in horseshoes, not tennis. The big question is: can Roger Federer, the man many are touting as the best tennis player who ever lived, get by Nadal and claim that vital French title?

Are there any other men who could challenge Nadal or Federer at Roland Garros? Not likely. The hot Spaniard, Robredo, the talented, big hitting Chilean, Fernando Gonzalez, and the 2004 winner Gaston Gaudio of Argentina, all have a shot at the title. But only if both Federer and Nadal stumble — something that no intelligent punter would lay down a wager on.

American hopes

News that Andy Roddick has injured his left foot has probably driven the final nail in that coffin. Roddick was a long shot to begin with, and a hobbled Roddick probably has no shot at a tournament as taxing as Roland Garros. James Blake's best surface is hard court, not clay, and despite his great foot speed, he is unlikely to kick up too much dust in Paris. For now, and perhaps for the foreseeable future, "An American in Paris" will be the title of a Gershwin tune, not a tennis headline.

Women's French Open

Defending champion Justine Henin-Hardenne remains the favorite, despite the fact that she has won no clay court tournaments this year, having been knocked out of the Family Circle Cup by Patty Schnyder and of Berlin by Nadia Petrova. Still, many consider her the best clay courter among the women. The big question is: what is her health like?

Petrova, the Russian who was flying under the radar, has now climbed to No. 3 in the world and also has three clay court titles under her belt this year. She has never been to a slam final, though, and so she remains an unknown in terms of performance on the really big tennis stages.

Kim Clijsters (http://kimclijsters.lawntennisnews.com/) has a clay court title as well, in Warsaw, but seems strangely unenthusiastic about her own chances at Roland Garros. She has announced her engagement, has insisted she is quitting the sport next year, and may already be showing signs that her mind is now elsewhere.

That leaves Amelie Mauresmo (http://ameliemauresmo.lawntennisnews.com/), the current world's No. 1 and the top seed. She seems to deserve the ranking, having captured the Australian Open title this year. So why are so many people still skeptical about her chances of taking home the French Open title too? Mauresmo has consistently had trouble playing before the hometown crowd in Paris. Throw in the fact that recent illness forced her to pull out of Rome, and her conditioning may be as questionable as her mental toughness when facing the toughest opponents of all — the French fans.

Which, of course, brings us around to THE story in women's tennis in 2006?
With the Williams sisters seemingly more interested in the Hollywood party circuit than the tennis circuit, and with so many other players, including Lindsay Davenport, constantly struggling with injuries, the women's game had fallen into the doldrums by the end of 2005.

So, who rode to the rescue? Why, of course, the best horsewoman in tennis, Martina Hingis. After a three-year break from the game, during which she indulged her love of show jumping horses, Hingis' ankles and feet and mind had healed enough for her to try a comeback, and what a comeback it became. From the moment last fall that word leaked out she might return, Hingis has been the hottest item in the sport. Fans were delighted, but critics were wary.

OK, she might beat the lesser players, but she'd be no match for the power girls. But one by one, she recorded victories over them, starting with the "it girl" of tennis, Maria Sharapova, and later beat Lindsay Davenport, Svetlana Kuznetsova, and Elena Dementieva.

It all came together last Sunday in Rome. There Hingis bested arch rival Venus Williams in the semi-final, dropping the first set at love, but handling the next two sets so smartly that they looked routine. The final against hot 20-year-old Dinara Safina was almost a foregone conclusion. Hingis rolled through the first set, had a hiccup toward the end of the second, but overcame her nerves and fought off four break points to serve out the match.

That tournament victory was highly significant, because Hingis comes into Roland Garros match tough and now brimming with self-confidence, and if she can keep it up, she also comes in playing a different brand of clay court tennis, an aggressive brand, which keeps her planted right on the baseline when rallies get started, but moves her toward the net as often as possible. That's a place her opponents do not want to see Martina Hingis. She also has one of the best transition games in the sport. Hingis is better from no-man's land than any other player in tennis, with the exception of her fellow Swiss Roger Federer. While by no means the favorite, Hingis is now the leading dark-horse candidate to capture the French title. Can she actually do it? I wouldn't bet against her.

But, it won't be easy. Martina Hingis (http://hingis.lawntennisnews.com/) does NOT fly under the radar. Once booed off the court at Roland Garros, Martina has become the fan favorite at every stop on the WTA tour she has visited so far. Aside from Maria Sharapova (http://sharapova.lawntennisnews.com/), she has become the glamour girl of the sport, but a glamour girl actually admired more for her tennis skills than any other trait.

Commentators who once blasted her now refer to the "genius of Martina Hingis." Friendly commentators tag her "the magician." All that positive attention means that Hingis now has little time for herself, with both the press and the WTA tour intent on exploiting her celebrity status. Dark horses usually benefit from the lack of attention they get. Hingis finds herself in the rare position of being a dark horse many people are expecting to win. It would so help along the story line if she did.

At any rate, the fate of two Swiss players, one fighting to prove he really is the best in history, and the other the comeback kid who has already tasted greatness, but now wants a second helping, are the story lines going into the 2006 French Open.

TomTennis
May 27th, 2006, 11:07 PM
"With the Williams sisters seemingly more interested in the Hollywood party circuit than the tennis circuit, and ............."

Venus just has to win RG! :devil: Then slap the person that wrote this in the face with the trophy :worship:

JulesVerne
May 27th, 2006, 11:15 PM
Reading that article makes you feel that Martina is the favourite.

Actually expect Justine or Svetlana to win.

mila_mail
May 28th, 2006, 12:52 AM
hope venus can win!!!

nickoteen
May 28th, 2006, 12:54 AM
hey thats our article .... :)

Nice to see it get distributed here as well lol :)

-nick

PLP
May 28th, 2006, 01:00 AM
Dark horses usually benefit from the lack of attention they get. Hingis finds herself in the rare position of being a dark horse many people are expecting to win. It would so help along the story line if she did.

Very interesting and true>P

No.1Hingis
May 28th, 2006, 01:28 AM
I just hope she really focus on play great.. she already is a legend.. so.. this is for funny.. if she does it.. welcome.. Im sure she is gonna be at final rounds.. so.. COME ON MARTINA.. WE SUPPORT YOU OVER WHATEVER THERE HAPPENDS ... I need to be kind of caution ..

Buitenzorg
May 28th, 2006, 03:41 AM
My money on Hingis, Justine or Petrova!