View Full Version : Minesweeper 3D

Aug 28th, 2005, 09:52 PM
I have wasted 1000s of hours of my life playing the original Minesweeper, and I still love it. Unfortunately, after all these years I have reached such a level of skill that the only way to make it interesting is to put in a stupid number of mines (200).

However, tonight I stumbled across the game's successor: Minesweeper 3D :bowdown:


I have been playing this for 45 minutes and I can already see many more 1000s of hours being wasted. And I'm only on the 5x5x5 grid. Forget having a career, I've found my new calling: I am going to be a Minesweeper slacker.

Tonight, I am truly happy.

Aug 28th, 2005, 11:32 PM
what are your best times?

for the old one

Aug 28th, 2005, 11:49 PM
I haven't played the built-in grids for years but I think it was something like 9 seconds, 47 seconds, 99 seconds. I kid you not.

Aug 29th, 2005, 12:42 AM
I've had a love affair with Minesweeper since before I married, and my wife can tell you how bad. :lol:
Anyway, my best times are:

6 seconds (05-4-04)
45 seconds (08-14-03)
113 (08-27-03)
Aside for my 6 second best time, I've actually had a much better 'expert' best time in the sub-90s. ;) But since I upgraded my OS I don't know the specific date. :wavey:

I'll check out the 3D version NOW!!! :lol:

Aug 29th, 2005, 06:16 AM
my friend is pretty good at this game. She got the first one in 2 seonds then the medium one in like 30 then the hard one in like 82

Aug 29th, 2005, 06:19 AM
15 - beginner
98 - intermediate
418 - advanced ... these are the old times...

the 3d thing doesn't look that great tho

Aug 29th, 2005, 10:14 AM
I got the first one in 3 seconds, which was totally accidental.. I just clicked twice and it was all solved. the second one in 37 seconds. Have a tough time with intermediate, 144 seconds.

Aug 29th, 2005, 12:18 PM
I've done the intermediate one in 29 seconds, but I think I can bring that time down a little more

Meteor Shower
Aug 29th, 2005, 12:47 PM
I'll check it out, thanks

Aug 29th, 2005, 01:05 PM
Original is better.