Monika just enter in a 14 000 000 $ in her carier she actualy have
14,013,664 and she need 23 000$ to be in front od Lindsay.....
Apr 3rd, 2002, 04:42 AM
:bounce: :bounce: :bounce: :kiss:
Apr 3rd, 2002, 04:46 AM
I'm surprised that having won 9 GS and 43 other titles, Seles is not in front of Davenport (who only has 3 GS and 34 other titles!):confused:
Apr 3rd, 2002, 04:52 AM
That's because Lindsay has had more recent success than Monica. It is absolutely stunning to think that Navratilova is only a few thousand out of first place, given the prize money in her heyday. Perhaps BoiledEgg could tell us what her typical Wimbledon winners purse was in the mid 80's.
Apr 3rd, 2002, 09:40 AM
http://half-time2.tripod.com/cgi-bin/bounce2.gif Go Monica!!!! http://half-time2.tripod.com/cgi-bin/bounce2.gif
And who is number 1 by the way?
Apr 3rd, 2002, 11:30 AM
Wow, that's a lot!!!
Apr 4th, 2002, 12:47 AM
1 STEFFI GRAF 21,895,277
2 MARTINA NAVRATILOVA 20,475,494
3 MARTINA HINGIS 17,771,666
4 ARANTXA SANCHEZ-VICARIO 16,633,098
5 LINDSAY DAVENPORT 14,036,870
6 MONICA SELES 14,013,664
7 JANA NOVOTNA 11,249,134
8 CONCHITA MARTINEZ 9,855,925
9 VENUS WILLIAMS 9,728,010
10 CHRIS EVERT 8,896,195
11 GABRIELA SABATINI 8,785,850
12 NATASHA ZVEREVA 7,728,086
13 NATHALIE TAUZIAT 6,620,475
14 SERENA WILLIAMS 6,610,824
15 HELENA SUKOVA 6,391,245
16 MARY PIERCE 6,275,906
17 JENNIFER CAPRIATI 5,527,105
I just have to tell you that Monika has won 9 grand slams and Lindsay is in front of her because in 1991-92-93 the womens prize were realy low comparing to today.
Apr 4th, 2002, 03:39 AM
I agree that the most amazing stat is Martina Navrat at number 2. Also the fact that Chris Evert NEVER even played a match in the '90s and is still at number 10 is pretty incredible also. If the money were adjusted for inflation how far ahead would Navrat and Chrissie be???
Apr 4th, 2002, 03:42 AM
I seem to remember a time when Martina was the all-time leading money winner. That's Women OR Men.