View Full Version : Why not to evaluate the tournament websites???

Jan 11th, 2005, 05:20 AM
I think that Sydney's website is under all!
So, i propose you all to give a mark for each website (1 to 10), of course depending if it's a GC, a Tier I, a Tier II, a Tier III, etc. How to say that? we must also considerate country and sponsors. I think that we should be more expect of a Tier II than a GC... Sometimes, Tier III websites are more easy to use than GC websites... Please, give some critics with your mark!

For Sydney, my mark would be about 3 or 4 ... (Because of not real updated scores; impossible to get the order of play, but, at least something like live scoreboard...)

Maybe some WTA & Sony Ericsson high personalities come here sometimes...
Maybe they can consider our critics... ;) ;) ;)

Jan 11th, 2005, 05:24 AM
I think all tournaments should provide live scoring. That counts highly with me.

The Sydney website IS under-par though. I'd give it a 5 at most.

All the Grand Slams have excellent websites (especially Wimbledon and the US Open). They're pretty much all 10's.

Jan 11th, 2005, 10:24 AM
Yeah, Sydney site is poor... live scores aren't working, not many articles, very boring looking... and the magazine is a farce.... its the bloody December 2004 Australian Tennis Magazine, with an extra cover. LITERALLY