I've feeling that MAURESMO or SERENA would ....

WIN this year 2004 - Roland Garros Title :bounce:

IF either Serena or/and Amelie reaching Rome Final....I think they have a huge chances to WIN

My Bet is

Serena 35% Amelie 35% to WIN :bounce:

;)

:tape:

Amélie has the ability but I don't see her having the mental strength
She was playing well last year and she got trashed by Serena in the semis

Amélie has the ability but I don't see her having the mental strength
She was playing well last year and she got trashed by Serena in the semis
It was in the quarters, Serena was the one that lost in the semis.;)

It was in the quarters, Serena was the one that lost in the semis.;)
I knew that :o I kinda remember serena's semi now ;)
oops

how could you forget the, um, incidents that happened in the semi match? ;)

re. the thread, i think so too :)

It will definitely be Serena. :bounce:

I think Mauresmo is currently in the best form, but I too wonder about her mental strenght of playing before the Paris crowd and not to mention the added pressure of possibly being the Number 2 seed. That's a lot of pressure for AM.

As long as the knee is feeling good, Serena will always a contender....remember that since ´98 she has only lost to the winner or has won the tournament herself.

As long as the knee is feeling good, Serena will always a contender....remember that since ´98 she has only lost to the winner or has won the tournament herself.
:eek: wow! never looked at it like that!

:eek: wow! never looked at it like that!


Yep...for sure....her track record at almost all the slams is like that.
´98: lost to ASV, guess who won?
´99: lost to Mary Joe, only one who didn´t win.
´00: didn´t play.
´01: lost to Jen in QF, Jen went on to win it.
´02: winner
´03: lost to Juju in the SF, who won it?! Juju.

Not bad I´d say.
In fact in Serena´s career only Vivi, Elena L, Lindsay D, Martina H, Jennifer and Venus beat Serena at a slam without going on to win the title at any of the slams.

I think Mauresmo is currently in the best form, but I too wonder about her mental strenght of playing before the Paris crowd and not to mention the added pressure of possibly being the Number 2 seed. That's a lot of pressure for AM.So its more like Amelie to be 20% sure for the title.

Yep...for sure....her track record at almost all the slams is like that.
´98: lost to ASV, guess who won?
´99: lost to Mary Joe, only one who didn´t win.
´00: didn´t play.
´01: lost to Jen in QF, Jen went on to win it.
´02: winner
´03: lost to Juju in the SF, who won it?! Juju.

Not bad I´d say.
In fact in Serena´s career only Vivi, Elena L, Lindsay D, Martina H, Jennifer and Venus beat Serena at a slam without going on to win the title at any of the slams.

Correction, Venus beat Serena in 00' Semi's Wimbledon
and went on to win beating Lindsay in the final.

Correction, Venus beat Serena in 00' Semi's Wimbledon
and went on to win beating Lindsay in the final.


Yeah...but she didn´t do it at the ´98 oz open.

It should be Amelie, I´d make a bet on her...it would be pretty nice for the frenchmen. Allez Amelie (and Justine, of course;))

Yeah...but she didn´t do it at the ´98 oz open.
I was thrown off when you said:
Venus beat Serena at a slam without going on to win the title at any of the slams.

:cool:

I was thrown off when you said:


:cool:



Yeah...my bad.