PDA

View Full Version : Serena's knee surgery opens door for battle for No. 1 by Belgian duo


hingis-seles
Aug 18th, 2003, 01:44 PM
Serena's knee surgery opens door for battle for No. 1 by Belgian duo

BY JAMES BECK Of The Post and Courier Staff

Serena Williams' knee surgery came so suddenly it caught the tennis world flat-footed. As Serena pulled out of tournament after tournament and finally yielded to surgery, the WTA Tour appeared to be subdued.

Finally, there was a race for the No. 1 ranking in the world. Women's tennis would be as exciting as ever, just with new faces challenging for world supremacy. Kim Clijsters and Justine Henin-Hardenne would be worthy beneficiaries of the decline of the Williams sisters, just as Steffi Graf benefited so greatly from Monica Seles' unfortunate stabbing 10 years ago.

Clijsters took the top spot by default last week, although she may have claimed it legitimately a few weeks later. Serena was in a position where she practically had to win the U.S. Open to retain her top ranking.

Next year should be an interesting one for women's tennis. Clijsters and Henin-Hardenne likely will end 2003 in the top two positions in the world. The Belgians are young, just 20 and 21 years old, and should be around for awhile. The big question, of course, pertains to the Williams sisters and their futures in tennis.

Serena will be 22 next month and Venus is 23, so age shouldn't be an issue. But no one knows what impact knee surgery will have on Serena's tennis game. If her mobility is restricted by knee problems, she will become much more vulnerable.

Knee injuries often become career-defining obstacles for tennis players, as well as other athletes. Graf appeared to be virtually certain of breaking Margaret Court's record of 24 Grand Slam singles titles when she won the 1996 U.S. Open, her sixth consecutive title in Grand Slams in which she competed and 21st Grand Slam success overall. Of course, a series of knee injuries and surgeries the next three years limited Graf to just one more Grand Slam title.

Hopefully, Serena will be able to overcome surgery and be as good as new when 2004 starts.

Going into the U.S. Open with her younger sister sidelined, Venus Williams normally would be the player to beat. But Venus hasn't played in a tournament since losing to Serena in the Wimbledon final. Venus continues to withdraw from tournaments due to the abdominal injury she suffered at Wimbledon, and has fallen all the way to fifth in the world rankings.

The word from the WTA is that Venus reportedly has resumed practicing, although she doesn't have Serena to help her prepare for the U.S. Open.

great smash
Aug 18th, 2003, 01:48 PM
quite accurate article I'd say!

Cariaoke
Aug 18th, 2003, 01:50 PM
that's a fair article.

Hulet
Aug 18th, 2003, 01:51 PM
That's a correct assesment: The williams sisters are so much on a decline that an injured Venus is the favourite at the USO.

great smash
Aug 18th, 2003, 01:54 PM
That's a correct assesment: The williams sisters are so much on a decline that an injured Venus is the favourite at the USO.

Funny how you keep reading things that aren't even written...

Pureracket
Aug 18th, 2003, 01:57 PM
Decent article.

bandabou
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:16 PM
Good article....now itīs to be seen if the Belgians can keep this up and start dominating the slams with the sisters present and healthy. Remember this: the sisters always come back strong after an injury, so the Belgians better be ready for the rumble!

skanky~skanketta
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:22 PM
V & S are too good to not make a stellar comeback.

Kart
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:22 PM
Kim Clijsters and Justine Henin-Hardenne would be worthy beneficiaries of the decline of the Williams sisters, just as Steffi Graf benefited so greatly from Monica Seles' unfortunate stabbing 10 years ago.

Am I the only person that thinks the second half of that sentence was really unnecessary ?

lizchris
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:25 PM
Funny how you keep reading things that aren't even written...

If you check the USO website, they have an injured Venus as the second favorite to win the USO.

Cariaoke
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:26 PM
kart, you're not. wtf @ that...

Pureracket
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:31 PM
I thought that that comment was nice and catty. . .LOL

bandabou
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:41 PM
Am I the only person that thinks the second half of that sentence was really unnecessary ?

But isnīt it true?! ;)

great smash
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:44 PM
If you check the USO website, they have an injured Venus as the second favorite to win the USO.

Weren't we discussing this article instead of the one of the USO website...

skanky~skanketta
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:44 PM
lol@bandabou!

so true, but unneccesary.

DA FOREHAND
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:51 PM
Totally uneccesary. As IF STEFFI was a nobody who'd won nothing prior to that.


If Venus is entered she's def. the favorite to win the US Open title. If she's beaten by any player in the field including the Beligians, it will be considered an upset.

per4ever
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:58 PM
kart, I agree. I don't see why that part is in it... the writer is a selesfan I think ;)

lizchris
Aug 18th, 2003, 02:59 PM
Weren't we discussing this article instead of the one of the USO website...

That's not the point. It wouldn't matter to you what was written in any article, because you think Venus will lose anyway. I am trying to point out that regardless of what this article says, Venus is still a favorite. Reemember, she has proven she can actually win the tournament; Kim and Justine haven't, yet.

Kart
Aug 18th, 2003, 03:04 PM
But isnīt it true?! ;)

Actually it isn't.

Serena will be out for months and Venus might be back by next week.

Not quite the same as two years.

Not that that's the point anyway - it's the relevance, which I still fail to see :wazzup:.

Kart
Aug 18th, 2003, 03:05 PM
kart, I agree. I don't see why that part is in it... the writer is a selesfan I think ;)

LOL :). Probably.

great smash
Aug 18th, 2003, 03:07 PM
That's not the point. It wouldn't matter to you what was written in any article, because you think Venus will lose anyway. I am trying to point out that regardless of what this article says, Venus is still a favorite. Reemember, she has proven she can actually win the tournament; Kim and Justine haven't, yet.

That's where our discussion ends I guess, because I never said I expect Venus to lose. My only statements were that I like the content of this article (which leaves the question of Venus' chances an open question), and that another article should not be dragged along to discuss this one.

I also believe a completely healthy Venus is the favourite to win, but in contrast to Williams fans I'm not saying a Venus playing at 80% will still win without any doubt.

disposablehero
Aug 18th, 2003, 03:11 PM
Actually it isn't.

Serena will be out for months and Venus might be back by next week.

Not quite the same as two years.

Not that that's the point anyway - it's the relevance, which I still fail to see :wazzup:.

Not to mention that they injured themselves. Playing tennis. I'm not sure the motivation for that sentence, but I don't think any of the players mentioned would like the comparison.

lizchris
Aug 18th, 2003, 03:14 PM
That's where our discussion ends I guess, because I never said I expect Venus to lose. My only statements were that I like the content of this article (which leaves the question of Venus' chances an open question), and that another article should not be dragged along to discuss this one.

I also believe a completely healthy Venus is the favourite to win, but in contrast to Williams fans I'm not saying a Venus playing at 80% will still win without any doubt.

Venus was about 70% and she beat Kim at Wimbeldonn. We now know Serena wasn't 100% and she won Wimbeldon, so anything is possible. We don't know if Venus is still suffering from her injury, but I do know that she was injury free until up until the Thursday before the start of the Canadian Openn and as a precaution, she withdrew.

bwguy
Aug 18th, 2003, 03:23 PM
Am I the only person that thinks the second half of that sentence was really unnecessary ?

The only relevance is that in both cases other players have been able to capitalize on the number 1 player being injured, regardless of how the injuries were incurred. True enough, but a better comparison would probably be between players injured due to physical ailments from on-court play. As it is, it trivializes the Seles attack.

bandabou
Aug 18th, 2003, 03:48 PM
That's where our discussion ends I guess, because I never said I expect Venus to lose. My only statements were that I like the content of this article (which leaves the question of Venus' chances an open question), and that another article should not be dragged along to discuss this one.

I also believe a completely healthy Venus is the favourite to win, but in contrast to Williams fans I'm not saying a Venus playing at 80% will still win without any doubt.

As long as you know that! Healthy Venus= 99 % sure to win title.
80 % Venus= 90 % chance of winning it...but whoīs gonna beat her?!

Kim " I canīt close out close matches" Clijsters or
Justine" Iīm just starting to learn to play on hardcourts and I havenīt taken a set off Venus in a year." Henin?!

Pluuuzzzz!!