PDA

View Full Version : Britney naked


CondiLicious
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:10 PM
I guess you could call her Stripped

http://images.thesun.co.uk/picture/0,,2003350335,00.jpg

http://images.thesun.co.uk/picture/0,,2003350332,00.jpg

apoet29
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:16 PM
I guess she's not that innocent anymore!

Nicoleke
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:18 PM
Britney Spears is really " good - looking " :) !!!!!

CondiLicious
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:22 PM
Why is she doing it though? Is there like a reason behind it? Otherwise she's just gonna be compared to Christina. And... I dunno... maybe she just likes taking her clothes off but to get attention and things Britney doesn't need to do that.

alexusjonesfan
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:32 PM
she thinks she's madonna :eek:

too bad she was a teeny-bopper first, I dunno how she's gonna shed that persona...without turning into a ChristiHOna clone

apoet29
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:32 PM
Why is she doing it though? Is there like a reason behind it? Otherwise she's just gonna be compared to Christina. And... I dunno... maybe she just likes taking her clothes off but to get attention and things Britney doesn't need to do that.

Actually, she probably does need to "strip" to get attention. Let's be honest here. Britney is a talented dancer, but singing is not necessarily her forte. For all of Christina's stripping, she does have one hell of a voice. That voice will be the saving grace of Christina's career. Britney's doesn't have that voice, so she has to get attention in other ways. I'm not knocking Brit; she has to do what will work for her career. But that's the reality of her situation.

CondiLicious
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:36 PM
Actually, she probably does need to "strip" to get attention. Let's be honest here. Britney is a talented dancer, but singing is not necessarily her forte. For all of Christina's stripping, she does have one hell of a voice. That voice will be the saving grace of Christina's career. Britney's doesn't have that voice, so she has to get attention in other ways. I'm not knocking Brit; she has to do what will work for her career. But that's the reality of her situation.

But no... I think she could still sell if she went with the good girl image. Unless she is a bad girl and is being herself.

Poe
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:38 PM
"if you've got it..." ;)

carot
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:43 PM
ugh @ her piercing and tattoo

why ruin a perfectly fine body? :drool:

Dava
Jul 31st, 2003, 05:53 PM
Rah :drool:

decemberlove
Jul 31st, 2003, 06:04 PM
But no... I think she could still sell if she went with the good girl image. Unless she is a bad girl and is being herself.

britney is played out. people tired quickly of that fake, good girl front she had up. she knows she got to re-do her image or shes done for. she doesnt have much to go on except for her looks/presentation.

ßcoene
Jul 31st, 2003, 06:39 PM
I like the first picture most.

DunkMachine
Jul 31st, 2003, 07:34 PM
Wait the tattoo and piercing are speaking to me.......... Shshshshsh What are they trying to say?.....

FREAK!!!!!

CondiLicious
Jul 31st, 2003, 08:15 PM
Look at her back... She's got cellulite.

decemberlove
Jul 31st, 2003, 08:21 PM
Look at her back... She's got cellulite.


thats not cellulite, thats just a bit of fat.

most girls have cellulite anyway

i swear, her legs and ass used to be thicker, the fuck happened?

Mr. Man
Jul 31st, 2003, 08:27 PM
Diva, Obviously you havn't seen cellulite. ;)

::responding to the thread:: :lick:

CondiLicious
Jul 31st, 2003, 08:30 PM
Diva, Obviously you havn't seen cellulite. ;)

::responding to the thread:: :lick:

Of course I have never seen cellulite. My body is of course perfect. But I imagine that thats what cellulite would look like. I apologize if I am wrong.

Malin
Jul 31st, 2003, 08:44 PM
It does remind me of Christina but Britney still looks a million times better than that dirty slut!!

Madhuri
Jul 31st, 2003, 09:37 PM
"i swear, her legs and ass used to be thicker, the fuck happened?"

It's called photo retouching. Britney's legs & thighs are much thicker than that from what I see in paparrazi photos of her taken on the streets. Women's magazines are notorius for "slimming" down female celebrities in their photo spreads.

Madhuri
Jul 31st, 2003, 09:42 PM
http://www.vision-gal.org/~ambition/ha.jpg


I wonder if Britney will get as much flack as Christina?

Bacardi
Jul 31st, 2003, 10:08 PM
Well, as for Britney... I'd still hit it :lol:

But XTina is just NASTY..... just SKANK :spit:

darren cahill
Jul 31st, 2003, 10:11 PM
arent these photos old? it seems like i saw them a long time ago

but they are still slamming...i love her.

Keith
Jul 31st, 2003, 10:14 PM
They need to airbrush Britney's pics more.

Mase
Jul 31st, 2003, 10:16 PM
They need to airbrush Britney's pics more.

:yeah: Right?

Rocketta
Jul 31st, 2003, 10:40 PM
Actually, she probably does need to "strip" to get attention. Let's be honest here. Britney is a talented dancer, but singing is not necessarily her forte. For all of Christina's stripping, she does have one hell of a voice. That voice will be the saving grace of Christina's career. Britney's doesn't have that voice, so she has to get attention in other ways. I'm not knocking Brit; she has to do what will work for her career. But that's the reality of her situation.

um Brittany can't dance that well either! :o

Maya, Pink, Janet, Madonna, Aaliyah (RIP :angel: ), TLC (RIP Left Eye :angel: ) can all dance her under the table. :sad: I think her body is her only saving grace. :o

Hendouble
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:11 PM
DivaMonicaSeles, daft though the sentiment may be, I must commend you on your superb anthem-cum-signature. An inspired adaptation along tennis lines!

CondiLicious
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:19 PM
DivaMonicaSeles, daft though the sentiment may be, I must commend you on your superb anthem-cum-signature. An inspired adaptation along tennis lines!

For Wimbledon it said:

Oh say can you see... Justine is golden light
What so proudly we hailed at the tennis Goddess gleaming?
Whose flat chest and bright eyes, would scare me in a fight,
O'er the milkyway we wanna watch, and her nice fans all screaming?
And the haters red glare, the water bombs bursting in air,
Gave proof they hate Justine but our love its still there.
O say, does that WE LOVE U JUSTINE banner yet wave
O'er the LAND of Wimbledon and the home of tennis?

Cybelle Darkholme
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:20 PM
Britany sucks. Her voice is crap.
Christina can at least sing. The girl has a voice on her.

and why do either of them have to be sluts? Are you privy to their sex life? I doubt it.

darren cahill
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:24 PM
so typical...aside from a few posters...everything on here is so nasty and so negative...

Martian KC
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:24 PM
Well, as for Britney... I'd still hit it :lol:

But XTina is just NASTY..... just SKANK :spit:

:lol: :lol: :lol: I agree!

AmErIcAn
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:40 PM
it dissapoints me that everything comes down to money.
She loves to sing/act but the only way she feels see can make money is buy sellling sex. why dosent the girl just get in the studio with decent producers work on a wicked album and show off her talent instead of her body.

Crazy Canuck
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:49 PM
it dissapoints me that everything comes down to money.
She loves to sing/act but the only way she feels see can make money is buy sellling sex. why dosent the girl just get in the studio with decent producers work on a wicked album and show off her talent instead of her body.
She's always used her looks to sell her product.. you expect her to all of a sudden stop that? :confused:

Crazy Canuck
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:51 PM
They need to airbrush Britney's pics more.
I agree. The last thing we need is the public lusting over real images of real people. We need to brush brush brush away those "flaws" so that we can all fall in love with impossible images that don't exist in nature.

Madhuri
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:52 PM
"She loves to sing/act but the only way she feels see can make money is buy sellling sex. why dosent the girl just get in the studio with decent producers work on a wicked album and show off her talent instead of her body."

As previously mentioned, she has no talent. She can't sing so she has to distract everyone from that fact by stripping and dancing like her life depended on it.

Christina Aguilera really doesn't have to take off her clothes. Her voice and music ( especially on "Stripped") are amazing. Her vocal talent gives her more options.

decemberlove
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:53 PM
"i swear, her legs and ass used to be thicker, the fuck happened?"

It's called photo retouching. Britney's legs & thighs are much thicker than that from what I see in paparrazi photos of her taken on the streets. Women's magazines are notorius for "slimming" down female celebrities in their photo spreads.


yes i know what its called, but these pictures barely looked touched. LOOK at them. if they did airbrush her body, they did a BAD job.

i dont like these pics at all. the W pics were way better. the background is boring and the pose as well. just blah.

Dawn Marie
Jul 31st, 2003, 11:55 PM
Yes, the girl has such TALENT such adoring uniquness about her.

NEXT! If I wanted to look at plastic mannequins I would have stayed inside the mall.

AmErIcAn
Aug 1st, 2003, 12:01 AM
She hasnt got outstanding Christina talent no. But nobody cared about that when baby one more time became one of the biggests songs ever!
like i said good producers and she'll be fine.

unfortunately she cant go back now and all the mothers of the kids buying her music will be disgusted and the "adult" audience are only interested in whats shes putting on a plate anyway.

its downhill from here completely.

Barrie_Dude
Aug 1st, 2003, 12:55 AM
I'd do her! :drool:

Cybelle Darkholme
Aug 1st, 2003, 02:07 AM
You don't see michellle branch shaking her ass. You don't see alicia keys shaking her ass. You don't see brandy shaking her ass.


You also don't see justin timberlake shaking his ass.

so really if they had any self resepct britany and christina would put some fucking clothes on.

Malin
Aug 1st, 2003, 02:20 AM
None of the people you have mentioned have as many hits as Britney our have sold as many records. She may not be the best singer but obviously she's got something to be so big.

And you only seem to mention Britney and Christina not wearing much but what about Mariah, Mya, Lil Kim etc.

Rocketta
Aug 1st, 2003, 02:51 AM
None of the people you have mentioned have as many hits as Britney our have sold as many records. She may not be the best singer but obviously she's got something to be so big.

And you only seem to mention Britney and Christina not wearing much but what about Mariah, Mya, Lil Kim etc.

Well frankly when your speaking of white pre-pubescent teens numbers really don't matter in terms of a reflection on the quality of an artist. Think about this. Why do you think Enimen sells more albums than any rapper out there cause "he's the best". Yeah Right and I have some swamp land to sell you. When white teens as a group think an artist is cool they will sell way more than any other artist just based on the fact of sheer numbers in the US. It is not a reflection on who is "best" or "talented".

Fantastic
Aug 1st, 2003, 03:30 PM
It's all perception, but I think more people are influenced by what their friends or the media say than actually making up their own minds for themselves. Most of the time, the conclusion is met before even watching or listening to the artist perform. Some even deny ever watching or listening to a particular artist ever. So how do they come to their conclusions?

Anyway, I love Britney Spears. She's a charismatic performer, a good dancer and a more than adequate voice. The great thing about her is that when she's up on stage, you can't take your eyes away from her. None of the "better" voices can make the same claim. Mariah Carey tries to make us look, but the fact that she has to try, makes many turn away. Britney Spears has mystery and illusion in the same way Madonna does. It works for them.

caramel
Aug 1st, 2003, 04:40 PM
She´s not naked in the pics. :sad: They´re nice anyway. Oh well, I don´t know why I actually care about naked pics of Britney...:rolleyes:

Malin
Aug 2nd, 2003, 02:38 AM
Well frankly when your speaking of white pre-pubescent teens numbers really don't matter in terms of a reflection on the quality of an artist. Think about this. Why do you think Enimen sells more albums than any rapper out there cause "he's the best". Yeah Right and I have some swamp land to sell you. When white teens as a group think an artist is cool they will sell way more than any other artist just based on the fact of sheer numbers in the US. It is not a reflection on who is "best" or "talented".

I doubt only white teens are buying Britney and Eminem's albums, even with that Britney has still sold more so she she must be doing something right.

seldom83
Aug 2nd, 2003, 02:35 PM
man is she hot or what?

TheBoiledEgg
Aug 2nd, 2003, 02:40 PM
I'd do her! :drool:

nothing new there, you'd do a mosquito in a skirt too :lol: :lol:

Rocketta
Aug 2nd, 2003, 04:10 PM
I doubt only white teens are buying Britney and Eminem's albums, even with that Britney has still sold more so she she must be doing something right.

Where did I say only white teens have bought their albums? I said when white teens as a group think an artist is cool. That artist sales will be higher than other artists who may have a huge following of other groups just not White teens. That doesn't make (Britney or Em) any better cause they sold more albums. Now if they had an equal following amonst all groups of people then yes they are "the best" ala when Michael Jackson was the biggest. He was big in all groups.

Its a matter of population numbers.