PDA

View Full Version : Sorry TEEREXX, (and everyone else), But it looks like JUSTINE will win Roland Garros


Rtael
May 31st, 2003, 08:14 AM
I have spoken. So it shall be. Begone Teerexx! You and your hallucinagenics! :devil: :p :devil:

katrientje
May 31st, 2003, 08:17 AM
I hope you're right!

BasicTennis
May 31st, 2003, 08:22 AM
Everyone is entiltled to dream while Serena has the biggest chance to realize this dream for them for the second time in a row.:devil:

Rtael
May 31st, 2003, 08:28 AM
BT....that's really an opinion. When using an opinion you should not employ the term "chance" as chance is a mathematical term used to represent the percentage of probability of a situation and you have no mathematical proof that Serena has a greater chance to win this, so please don't use the term chance. Thank you.




BTW I'm just being pissy cause W/S fans are getting on my nerves cause there is just so damn many of them and certain ones can't shut their damn mouths....

BasicTennis
May 31st, 2003, 10:35 AM
BTW I'm just being pissy cause W/S fans are getting on my nerves cause there is just so damn many of them and certain ones can't shut their damn mouths....
LOL you bet our posts are effective to get into your nerves.:worship: that's the idea in the first place. :wavey:

This thread gives you the chance to employ your opinion.:kiss:

ns_Henin
May 31st, 2003, 10:43 AM
I think we better stay calm and wait match by match ;) or U will embarrased if ur b*tchin' opinion go wrong......
Dont be arrogant *sorry* :o

BasicTennis
May 31st, 2003, 10:47 AM
Only sore losers like you would be bothered with the results.;)

QUEENLINDSAY
May 31st, 2003, 12:15 PM
Rtael, what is your mathematical proof of Justine winning the french??? She was beateb by Momo last time they play on red clay.

Josh
May 31st, 2003, 12:17 PM
Last time Justine and Amélie played was in Berlin semis this year : 7-6(6) 6-4 to Justine. :p

And I agree with ns_henin

Dizzy Miss Lizzy
May 31st, 2003, 12:19 PM
Rtael, what is your mathematical proof of Justine winning the french??? She was beateb by Momo last time they play on red clay.

:confused: Last time they played on red clay was in the semis of berlin and Justine won :confused:

And besides, what has mathematics to do with tennis ?

K.F.C
May 31st, 2003, 12:23 PM
Rtael, what is your mathematical proof of Justine winning the french??? She was beateb by Momo last time they play on red clay.

Justine was the winner, not Amelie!!!

shap_half
May 31st, 2003, 01:00 PM
Justine has got to win this tournament and then go on to win Wimbledon!! Allez!

Rtael
May 31st, 2003, 08:25 PM
I never said I had mathematical proof...just that they didn't =D

hinquit
May 31st, 2003, 08:44 PM
I never head of a chocker win a grandslam.

Schalckske
May 31st, 2003, 08:45 PM
I never head of a chocker win a grandslam.

:rolleyes: Once it has to be the first time :p

hinquit
May 31st, 2003, 08:45 PM
I never head of a chocker win a grandslam.

Apologize for the spelling "heard"

Rtael
May 31st, 2003, 08:46 PM
I'd like to know what a chocker is! :angel:

o0O0o
May 31st, 2003, 08:46 PM
Wow hinquit, all I saw was "head" and "choking" somewhere in that "sentence". It's OK, I'm sure you'll get some practice to deal with that problem. ;)

hinquit
May 31st, 2003, 08:49 PM
I'd like to know what a chocker is! :angel:

1-5 serving for the match and ......what a chocker is""""""""""

6-2, 4-0 and..................what a chocker is@@@@@@@@@@@@

Rtael
May 31st, 2003, 08:50 PM
oh, oh, you mean choker? Maybe if you learned to spell I could understand you better. On second thought, nevermind, I'd rather not understand what your tyring to say. :angel:

Lien
May 31st, 2003, 08:58 PM
1-5 serving for the match and ......what a chocker is""""""""""

6-2, 4-0 and..................what a chocker is@@@@@@@@@@@@

You don't actually learn from your mistakes. Do you know what spelling is? If you still want to use chocker, you should give it another meaning cause two words with the same meaning that are very similar to each other, that would be a bit confusing I think.

Chokers can win grandslams, but you can't win a spelling contest.

hinquit
May 31st, 2003, 09:02 PM
You don't actually learn from your mistakes. Do you know what spelling is? If you still want to use chocker, you should give it another meaning cause two words with the same meaning that are very similar to each other, that would be a bit confusing I think.

Chokers can win grandslams, but you can't win a spelling contest.

Damit, you are talking to someone with an PhD my man.

harloo
May 31st, 2003, 09:03 PM
:rolleyes:

Rtael
May 31st, 2003, 09:05 PM
PhD=Phreaking huge Disorder?

hinquit
May 31st, 2003, 09:07 PM
Actually, sometimes we make fun on this board. But those two belgium
girls are doing very well. They get what it takes to win a grandslam
but only I am not sure of this year. Had not been the presence of
Venus and Serena, each would have a grandslam tittle by now.

Lien
May 31st, 2003, 09:07 PM
PhD=Phreaking huge Disorder?

Just love this one!

Rtael
May 31st, 2003, 09:10 PM
belgian, not belgium =P

Lien
May 31st, 2003, 09:12 PM
Oh and title not tittle.

Shuji Shuriken
May 31st, 2003, 09:28 PM
:rolleyes:
agreed