View Full Version : Michael Jackson dangles baby ... how do YOU feel about it?

Nov 21st, 2002, 08:39 AM
:rolleyes: Choose Your Destiny :rolleyes:

Nov 21st, 2002, 08:51 AM
How do *I* feel about it?

I really couldnt care less :p

Nov 21st, 2002, 08:54 AM
why aren't social services all over this??? everyone's talking about it, but no-one's doing anything. it's sickening. there should at least be an investigation.

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:14 AM
I think he's gone more gaga than before.

Imagine having him as your dad. Just imagine it! Dont have nightmares.


Nov 21st, 2002, 09:22 AM

he probably realised how dangerous it was to dangle the baby over the railing the moment he did so... [at least i hope so...]

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:25 AM
Originally posted by gorecki

he probably realised how dangerous it was to dangle the baby over the railing the moment he did so... [at least i hope so...]

He did. I saw it on TV. He wanted to show the baby to the crowd, lifted it over the railing, baby started moving a bit too much for comfort, Michael immediately realised it and took the baby back inside. I think the baby's dangled on the other side of the railing for about 1 second or so.

Still, it's crazy! There should be an investigation and into more than just this escapade.

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:31 AM
Is that you Tine? :o

Anyway, the baby's feet seemed to hit the railing and then he pulled the kid back. It did look a lil scary when the baby's feet hit the bar!

I want to know why the press are having such a sudden fascination with Michael Jackson lately? :confused:

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:33 AM
yup, it's me ;) I'm trying to discover my religious *cough* self ;)

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:34 AM
you have to actually dangle the baby out the porch before you realize it's dangerous??? if this was a "regular" guy the authorities would be involved long ago.

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:35 AM
I was surprised he was simply holding the baby by the neck, I would have supported it underneath its bum.

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:36 AM
puh-lease..aren't you all a lil overreacting?? It's because of this sick press who never give the celebrities privacy that these things happen.

I'm sure you will do things too, of which you think afterwards: I shouldn't have done that, it was too dangerous for the kids (for example). It looks scary..but it's his child!!! Do you really think he would bring the child in danger?????

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:37 AM
He DID bring the child in danger, K.

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:42 AM
I have made most of my pocket money in school babysitting. I've done it since I was 12. after school, full time during the summers... even at 12 I did not even come close to doing anything even remotely as stupid and careless as this. parents make mistakes, for sure, but dangling your child out the window??? who does that???

Nov 21st, 2002, 10:04 AM
I saw it on tv too..apparently he got "caught up in the moment" or sth. Ah yeah its alright to swing a baby over the railing then :rolleyes:

Nov 21st, 2002, 10:15 AM
everyone made a mistake but he is in the spotlight, he got carried away by the fans.

Nov 21st, 2002, 11:37 AM
Police and authorities here in Toronto say that the fact he's a celebrity, and lives elsewhere, wouldn't make a difference if he had done that here. There would have been AT LEAST AN INVESTIGATION of the possibility of child endangerment.

I guess they have lesser standards concerning children in Germany.

Nov 21st, 2002, 12:01 PM
Aren't u guys even borthered about the covering of the face??? The guy covers his kids faces with clothes even in the zoo so that no one will see them!!!!! That is real extreme to me. For Gods sake, is he the only celibrity with kids???? As a mother, i'm really enraged.

Nov 21st, 2002, 12:05 PM
that is so true. I first thought he only did it on that occasion, but if he does that every time they're in public... and on a second thought, if you don't want people to see them, why let them on the porch at all? keep them in the room, don't cover their faces.

Nov 21st, 2002, 12:12 PM
Yeah i have to say the towel on the kid's face was even more disturbing, not only he could have fallen over the railing but he was also suffocating *rolleyes smiley*

Nov 21st, 2002, 12:12 PM
i heard something like him making a reservation in a museum or something like that in the middle of the night for his kids. The keeper said the kids could barely stand cos they were so sleepy. Men something really needs to be done. Such abnormal upbringing.

Also, he wants to build a computer school in his netherland for the kids. That's like shutting them off from the world. I feel so sorry for those kids. Their mothers i think are entirely to blame for leaving them with the psycho.

Nov 21st, 2002, 12:37 PM
The fans below asked for it so he gave it to them. Anyway I saw it on TV on BBC and the baby was only over the rail for 1 second and he had a firm grip on it so people should just mind their own business. why is this on all the front pages :rolleyes:

must be a slow news week.

Nov 21st, 2002, 12:44 PM
If u've ever handled a baby, then u'll know how dangerous that act was. They are very slippery. U can never be 100% careful. A reckless split second is all it will take to kill a baby.

Michael not withstanding, It's really amazing that u see nothing wrong with an adult(celebrity or not) covering a kids face with a towel whenever in public. The dangling out of the rail is a serious issue but that masking one is just real bizarre to me.

Nov 21st, 2002, 12:52 PM
"the fans were asking for it"? what, it's all the fans' fault now? please. the way he's conducting himself with his children is disturbing and should be looked into. the authorities are not exempt from doing their job when a really rich guy is involved.

Nov 21st, 2002, 01:00 PM
If he is happy to show off his baby... how come he had to cover the baby's face with a towel... that is weird... ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)

And the way he dangled the baby over the railing... its kinda disturbing... its like a joke to him.... :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:

And besides.... is he really the biological father of the baby... I guessed not ........

He is getting weirder and weirder everytime he comes out in public.....

;) ;) ;) ;) ;) :bounce: :angel: :angel: :angel: :angel: :angel: :wavey: :( :( :( :( :( :bounce: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool: :drool:

Nov 21st, 2002, 01:08 PM
Originally posted by JoeyWinson
Imagine having him as your dad. Just imagine it!

nooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!!!!!!!!! heeeeeeeeeeeeeelp!!!!!!!

no, honestly, poor children...

Nov 21st, 2002, 02:16 PM
I prefer to see him dangling babies than grabbing his crotch, quite frankly.

Nov 21st, 2002, 02:25 PM
I think he lost the plot years ago.
A complete loony

Helen Lawson
Nov 21st, 2002, 02:27 PM
If he drops it he can just buy another one.

Nov 21st, 2002, 02:28 PM
really lol @ Helen!

Nov 21st, 2002, 02:30 PM
Originally posted by anton
The fans below asked for it so he gave it to them. Anyway I saw it on TV on BBC and the baby was only over the rail for 1 second and he had a firm grip on it so people should just mind their own business. why is this on all the front pages :rolleyes:

must be a slow news week.

Firm grip? Have you ever held a baby? He should have at least supported the baby under the bum.

Nov 21st, 2002, 02:30 PM
Helen, LOL :o

Martian Martin
Nov 21st, 2002, 02:32 PM
Eggy said it exactly right

Nov 21st, 2002, 03:56 PM

Nov 21st, 2002, 04:05 PM
Originally posted by Helen Lawson
If he drops it he can just buy another one.


Helen Lawson
Nov 21st, 2002, 04:29 PM
That picture makes him look like a bad drag queen who cannot decide whether to do Diana Ross or Jackie Onassis.

Nov 21st, 2002, 04:31 PM
"michael jackson dangles baby"

doesn't that sound kind of... i dunno... perverted? ;)

Nov 21st, 2002, 04:58 PM
How in heaven can this insane guy be allowed to do this to kids and people complain about a religion were women are not supposed to be viewed in public.

Have mercy on those children Dear Lord.

Nov 21st, 2002, 05:22 PM
Personally I think they should dangle him over the balcony..... preferably at the end of a rope!

Nov 21st, 2002, 06:07 PM
Slow news week - ok, and there are way more important stories that need covering, I'll agree with you there.

But you don't do something that publicly assinine and get to whine about your privacy being invaded...

Nov 21st, 2002, 07:07 PM
Originally posted by TheBoiledEgg
I think he lost the plot years ago.
A complete loony
I agree, i read today - and yes i know not to believe everything i read - that his kids have barely met any other children and they sleep while monitored by cameras:eek: poor kids, and i also read that the mother does not want anything to do with them. :sad:

Nov 21st, 2002, 07:13 PM
The mother will probably get sued if she ever wants to see her kids. She's probably signed some contract and got loads of money in return.

Smally's right, those kids lead the life the women in Afghanistan used to lead.

Nov 21st, 2002, 08:02 PM
he has wet dreams about little boys...the guys a sicko

Nov 21st, 2002, 08:36 PM
free michael!! :)

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:09 PM
Originally posted by anton
free michael!! :)

yes free him

Hang him from a 100 Storey Building upside down from a rope and then FREE HIM.

Nov 21st, 2002, 09:28 PM
I vote for the completely lost it option but I can't vote it won't let me.

Nov 21st, 2002, 10:07 PM
What a SICK FREAK!!!

Nov 21st, 2002, 10:18 PM
Voted number 1

Nov 22nd, 2002, 01:02 AM
lol@eggy...yes free him, and fre ehte kids from his wrath!!

lol@ the deludanoids who voted 3 :P

Bright Red
Nov 22nd, 2002, 02:14 AM
Wow. I didn't realize Michael Jackson is so despised. He made a mistake in my opinion. That's all. You live and learn.