PDA

View Full Version : 2001-2010 SEWTA Players That Would Have Been Ranked YE #1 In 2011


NA-GOAT
Oct 29th, 2011, 04:22 PM
Our Princess Karolina will be ranked #1 at the end of 2011 with 7485 ranking points from 16 tournaments :bowdown:

I saw a website online that has all of the SEWTA year end rankings since 1989 :eek:

http://tennis.quickfound.net/history/wta_top_20_1989-present.html

so decided to look back in time to see which players would have been ranked #1 in 2011 with their results in 2001-2010 :hug: the most surprising result was that Myskina 2004 and Pierce 2005 would have been year end #1 this year with their results from those years :lol: and also Serena in 2003 with 7 events played would have been #1 in 2011 :tape:

I think what this says is the general quality of play at the top of the SEWTA is going down :sad: I mean, 5 players from SEWTA 2005 and 4 players from SEWTA 2001 would have finished 2011 as Year End #1 ... and looking at the amazingly high point totals from Golden Flower JuJu in 2007, Golden Flower JuJu and Kim in 2003, Serena in 2002 :sobbing:

2010
1. Wozniacki 8035 (16 best)

2009
1. S Williams 9075 (16 best)
2. Safina 7800 (16 best)

2008
1. Jankovic 4710*2 = 9420 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
2. S Williams 3866*2 = 7732 (13 best)
3. Safina 3817*2 = 7634 (17 best - may or may not be higher than 7485 with 16 best)

2007
1. Henin 6155*2 = 12,310 (15 best)

2006
1. Henin 3998*2 = 7996 (13 best)

2005 (excluding quality points)
1. Davenport 4910*2 = 9820 (16 best)
2. Clijsters 4829*2 = 9658 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
3. Mauresmo 4030*2 = 8060 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
4. Sharapova 3958*2 = 7916 (15 best)
5. Pierce 3797*2 = 7594 (14 best)

2004 (excluding quality points)
1. Davenport 4760*2 = 9520 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
2. Mauresmo 4546*2 = 9092 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
3. Myskina 4012*2 = 8012 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)

2003 (excluding quality points)
1. Henin 6628*2 = 13256 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
2. Clijsters 6553*2= 13106 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
3. S Williams 3916*2 = 7832 (7 best) :eek:

2002 (excluding quality points)
1. S Williams 6080*2 = 12160 (13 best)
2. V Williams 5140*2 = 10280 (16 best)
3. Capriati 3796 * 2 = 7592 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)

2001 (excluding quality points)
1. Davenport 4902*2 = 9804 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
2. Capriati 4892*2 = 9784 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
3. V Williams 4128*2 = 8256 (12 best)
4. Hingis 3944*2 = 7888 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)

Wert.
Oct 29th, 2011, 04:30 PM
Our Princess Karolina will be ranked #1 at the end of 2011 with 7485 ranking points from 16 tournaments :bowdown:

I saw a website online that has all of the SEWTA year end rankings since 1989 :eek:

http://tennis.quickfound.net/history/wta_top_20_1989-present.html

so decided to look back in time to see which players would have been ranked #1 in 2011 with their results in 2001-2010 :hug: the most surprising result was that Myskina 2004 and Pierce 2005 would have been year end #1 this year with their results from those years :lol: and also Serena in 2003 with 7 events played would have been #1 in 2011 :tape:

I think what this says is the general quality of play at the top of the SEWTA is going down :sad: I mean, 5 players from SEWTA 2005 and 4 players from SEWTA 2001 would have finished 2011 as Year End #1 ... and looking at the amazingly high point totals from Golden Flower JuJu in 2007, Golden Flower JuJu and Kim in 2003, Serena in 2002 :sobbing:

2010
1. Wozniacki 8035 (16 best)

2009
1. S Williams 9075 (16 best)
2. Safina 7800 (16 best)

2008
1. Jankovic 4710*2 = 9420 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
2. S Williams 3866*2 = 7732 (13 best)
3. Safina 3817*2 = 7634 (17 best - may or may not be higher than 7485 with 16 best)

2007
1. Henin 6155*2 = 12,310 (15 best)

2006
1. Henin 3998*2 = 7996 (13 best)

2005 (excluding quality points)
1. Davenport 4910*2 = 9820 (16 best)
2. Clijsters 4829*2 = 9658 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
3. Mauresmo 4030*2 = 8060 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
4. Sharapova 3958*2 = 7916 (15 best)
5. Pierce 3797*2 = 7594 (14 best)

2004 (excluding quality points)
1. Davenport 4760*2 = 9520 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
2. Mauresmo 4546*2 = 9092 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
3. Myskina 4012*2 = 8012 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)

2003 (excluding quality points)
1. Henin 6628*2 = 13256 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
2. Clijsters 6553*2= 13106 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
3. S Williams 3916*2 = 7832 (7 best) :eek:

2002 (excluding quality points)
1. S Williams 6080*2 = 12160 (13 best)
2. V Williams 5140*2 = 10280 (16 best)
3. Capriati 3796 * 2 = 7592 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)

2001 (excluding quality points)
1. Davenport 4902*2 = 9804 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
2. Capriati 4892*2 = 9784 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)
3. V Williams 4128*2 = 8256 (12 best)
4. Hingis 3944*2 = 7888 (17 best but would still be higher than 7485 with 16 best)


:sobbing: :facepalm:

Miracle Worker
Oct 29th, 2011, 04:42 PM
So our Princess Caroline wouldn't be even in TOP3 or even in TOP5 in previous seasons with such amazing amount of points :spit:

Just amazing :haha:

goldenlox
Oct 29th, 2011, 04:56 PM
So none of those were YE #1 THREE years in a row?
Hmm... we'll see if the reigning Queen can do a 3peat

Matt01
Oct 29th, 2011, 05:09 PM
so decided to look back in time to see which players would have been ranked #1 in 2011 with their results in 2001-2010 :hug: the most surprising result was that Myskina 2004 and Pierce 2005 would have been year end #1 this year with their results from those years :lol: and also Serena in 2003 with 7 events played would have been #1 in 2011 :tape:



You know why these kinds of comparison don't work or does Matty have to explain this to you?

marineblue
Oct 29th, 2011, 05:13 PM
I see you can't get enough of celebrating that Woz has done a better job than your faves. It's really nice of you.
She doesn't get such a high number of threads even in her own forum:lol:

When will there be a slam winner stats comparing them to these players, though? That's when the real fun begins:oh:
Or are you too afraid?:lol:

dsanders06
Oct 29th, 2011, 05:19 PM
GOATniacki :bowdown:

NA-GOAT
Oct 29th, 2011, 05:21 PM
You know why these kinds of comparison don't work or does Matty have to explain this to you?

Matty please explain :bigwave:

NA-GOAT
Oct 29th, 2011, 05:33 PM
So our Princess Caroline wouldn't be even in TOP3 or even in TOP5 in previous seasons with such amazing amount of points :spit:

Just amazing :haha:

yes Caro would have finished 2005 as #6 :hug:

I see you can't get enough of celebrating that Woz has done a better job than your faves. It's really nice of you.
She doesn't get such a high number of threads even in her own forum:lol:

When will there be a slam winner stats comparing them to these players, though? That's when the real fun begins:oh:
Or are you too afraid?:lol:

thanks :bigwave:

what do you mean slam winner stats :shrug:

Mistress of Evil
Oct 29th, 2011, 05:53 PM
Actually, not that bad of a thread stats wise :yeah:
though, its intention to hate on poor little Princess Karolina is beyond evil, repulsive, in appropriate and a crime against humanity :o

NA-GOAT
Oct 29th, 2011, 06:34 PM
Actually, not that bad of a thread stats wise :yeah:
though, its intention to hate on poor little Princess Karolina is beyond evil, repulsive, in appropriate and a crime against humanity :o

the point of the thread is not about our Princess Karolina ... it is to show that not just her, but all of the top players in 2011 did not have that good of a year this year :facepalm:

the overall level of the SEWTA needs :help:

Mr.Sharapova
Oct 29th, 2011, 06:57 PM
The hate towards Caroline is getting ridiculous lately :oh:. Please NA-MUG stop doing that to our sunshine :sobbing:.

Matt01
Oct 29th, 2011, 07:08 PM
The hate towards Caroline is getting ridiculous lately :oh:. Please NA-MUG stop doing that to our sunshine :sobbing:.


Uh, we all know that you enjoy this thread :rolleyes: :p

@Na-Mug: It was a rhetorical question. I'm sure you can figure it out by yourself if you use your brain ;)

Mr.Sharapova
Oct 29th, 2011, 09:09 PM
Uh, we all know that you enjoy this thread :rolleyes: :p

@Na-Mug: It was a rhetorical question. I'm sure you can figure it out by yourself if you use your brain ;)

No I mean this is just pure comedy, opening threads like this just to bash on our real 1#.:p

Alejandrawrrr
Oct 29th, 2011, 09:34 PM
Interesting, but there's kindof a major flaw, and that's where Caro's points and the would-be YE#1s' points overlap. Like for example, Wozniacki's 2011 Indian Wells win is counted toward her 2011 YE ranking, so you can't really compare her to say, Kim who won it in 03 and 05 and would be a potential YE#1 based on that. After all, only one could win it. Though it was still interesting nonetheless, especially seeing Pierce as a potential YE#1.

NA-GOAT
Oct 30th, 2011, 12:17 AM
Interesting, but there's kindof a major flaw, and that's where Caro's points and the would-be YE#1s' points overlap. Like for example, Wozniacki's 2011 Indian Wells win is counted toward her 2011 YE ranking, so you can't really compare her to say, Kim who won it in 03 and 05 and would be a potential YE#1 based on that. After all, only one could win it. Though it was still interesting nonetheless, especially seeing Pierce as a potential YE#1.

yes you are right ... obviously only one player could have won each tournament ... but the point of the thread is that Caro garnered this many points in 2011 which was good enough to be #1 in 2011 but it wouldn't have been enough to be #1 any other year since 2001 ... and that the number of points other players garnered in other years were not enough to be #1 in those years but would have been good enough to be #1 in 2011

the conclusions are Caro's #1 2011 year would have been a top 5 finish in other years ... and other players like Myskina and Pierce never got to #1 in their careers but were unlucky to play in a time with other players earning so many points :sad:

moemoe
Oct 30th, 2011, 12:19 AM
Natalie Dechy

NA-GOAT
Oct 30th, 2011, 12:22 AM
Natalie Dechy

maybe :spit:

but you misunderstand the thread :lol:

moemoe
Oct 30th, 2011, 12:25 AM
maybe :spit:

but you misunderstand the thread :lol:

Oh yeah I just realized what this thread was.

bandabou
Oct 30th, 2011, 12:26 AM
Poor Caro..the hating's just too much. As the saying goes: no need to point out the obvious all the time.

NA-GOAT
Oct 30th, 2011, 01:53 AM
Oh yeah I just realized what this thread was.

:hug:

yeah but for the thread you were thinking, we may as well throw in Dechy, Cornet, Peer, Pennetta etc.

Poor Caro..the hating's just too much. As the saying goes: no need to point out the obvious all the time.

the stats in this thread are not obvious ... I don't think people realized that Pierce, Myskina could have been #1 in 2011 with their results :shrug:

anyway, this thread is not only about Caro ... it is about the medicore 2011 season by all players on the tour :angel:

DragonFlame
Oct 30th, 2011, 03:20 AM
This just shows players these days get far too many points for premier titles and that we´re still in a transition phase. We were spoiled with our old generation of players.